JäPS vs MP: match statistics
JäPS vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JäPS played against MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
JäPS has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. MP has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
JäPS scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.86. MP scores 0.57 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.35 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's games and 29% of MP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MP has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.04 per game. JäPS takes 8.0 shots per game, while MP takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
JäPS leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. MP leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
JäPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For MP, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.35 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). JäPS win 75% of home games, average 1.25 goals scored per home match and have scored 15 goals in the last 5 fixtures, winning 4 of 5. MP struggle away — 75% away defeats, concede 1.25 goals on average away and score only 0.5 goals on the road, with 50% of away matches goalless for them. Additionally, JäPS concede just 0.25 goals at home and record 75% clean sheets, while MP have only 25% clean sheets and conceded 12 goals in their last 5 games. Although MP have higher possession (51% vs 44%) and slightly higher away xG (1.27 vs 1.07), MP’s low shot conversion (5% vs 15% for JäPS) and poorer recent form (MP 1.2 pts vs JäPS 2.4 pts per game in the last 5) favor the home side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally JäPS has BTTS in 33% of matches, MP in 25%, but in the last 5 fixtures JäPS recorded BTTS in 40% and MP as high as 80%, which gives a strong short-term signal for both teams to score. In the last five matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded — MP regularly allows goals, and JäPS has recently been prolific in attack. xG values confirm this: the home side has xG 1.40 versus 1.32 conceded by MP (1.36 expected for JäPS on average), and MP has xG 1.27 versus 1.20 from the home side (1.24 on average for MP), translating to roughly 74% and 71% chances of scoring at least one goal. Seasonal clean sheet percentages are 33% for JäPS and 25% for MP, and average on-target shots 3.67 (JäPS) vs 4.25 (MP) suggest the visitors create slightly more chances and have a real opportunity to score. Considering MP’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the high xG for both teams (1.36 and 1.24) and recent goal averages 3.0 and 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 53% vs No at 47%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimated xG for this match is about 1.36 for JäPS (1.4 xG for, 1.32 xG conceded by MP) and 1.24 for MP (1.27 xG for, 1.20 xG conceded by JäPS), totaling ≈2.60 expected goals. In the last 5 matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded (3.6 goals per game), while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded (4.2 total), indicating recently open, higher-scoring games. Seasonally, however, JäPS only averages 0.67 goals per game with 67% of matches under 2.5, MP 0.50 goals with 75% under 2.5, and the league averages 2.35 goals per game, which limits the probability of very high scores. Additionally, JäPS averages 12.33 shots (3.67 on target), MP 10.0 (4.25 on target), but the conversion rate is only 5%, so not all chances become goals. Considering the combined xG ≈2.60 and the very high recent goal figures (last 5 matches: JäPS 3.6, MP 4.2 average goals per game), the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (recommended). I assess full-match probabilities as follows: Over 1.5 ≈86%, Over 2.5 ≈60% (in the last 5 matches proportion of games above 2.5: JäPS 40% and MP 80%), and Over 3.5 ≈30% due to seasonal unders and low shot efficiency.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side shows a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 67% of matches (2 instances) and score an average of 0.67 goals by Half-Time compared to 0.25 for MP. Over the full match JäPS averages 0.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while MP averages 0.5 scored and 1.25 conceded, indicating low efficiency from both teams but a slight offensive edge for the hosts. xG favors JäPS 1.4 to 1.27 and the hosts attempt more shots per match (12.33 vs 10.0), while in the last 5 fixtures JäPS won 4 of 5 (80%) and averaged 3.0 goals, whereas MP has only a 40% win rate in that period and conceded 2.4 goals on average. Considering the hosts frequently take a lead at the break (67%) and show markedly better recent form, the most likely scenario is maintenance of that lead through full-time (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JäPS | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.14 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JäPS is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - JäPS · 1.2 pts / game - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JäPS is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - JäPS · 0.57 goals / game - MP
JäPS is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.86 goals / game - JäPS · 1.29 goals / game - MP
JäPS scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 meczów).
MP scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JäPS
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - JäPS · 1.57 pts / game - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JäPS
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JäPS | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.86 | 2.35 | ▼ 1.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 41% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 41% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 71% | 35% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 65% | ▼ 43% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of JäPS vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs MP?
JäPS score 1.00 goals per game on average and MP 0.57. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 29% of MP's.
What form are JäPS and MP in?
Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and MP 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs MP?
The statistical background for JäPS vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


