Finland - YkkösliigaJärvenpään keskuskenttäData current as of September 06, 2026

JäPS vs MP: match statistics

JäPS crest
JäPS
0 : 2half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

JäPS vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JäPS played against MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

JäPS has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. MP has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

JäPS scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.86. MP scores 0.57 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.35 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's games and 29% of MP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

MP has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.04 per game. JäPS takes 8.0 shots per game, while MP takes 11.0.

First-half and second-half trends

JäPS leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. MP leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.14 after halftime.

When the teams score

JäPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For MP, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.35 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). JäPS win 75% of home games, average 1.25 goals scored per home match and have scored 15 goals in the last 5 fixtures, winning 4 of 5. MP struggle away — 75% away defeats, concede 1.25 goals on average away and score only 0.5 goals on the road, with 50% of away matches goalless for them. Additionally, JäPS concede just 0.25 goals at home and record 75% clean sheets, while MP have only 25% clean sheets and conceded 12 goals in their last 5 games. Although MP have higher possession (51% vs 44%) and slightly higher away xG (1.27 vs 1.07), MP’s low shot conversion (5% vs 15% for JäPS) and poorer recent form (MP 1.2 pts vs JäPS 2.4 pts per game in the last 5) favor the home side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonally JäPS has BTTS in 33% of matches, MP in 25%, but in the last 5 fixtures JäPS recorded BTTS in 40% and MP as high as 80%, which gives a strong short-term signal for both teams to score. In the last five matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded — MP regularly allows goals, and JäPS has recently been prolific in attack. xG values confirm this: the home side has xG 1.40 versus 1.32 conceded by MP (1.36 expected for JäPS on average), and MP has xG 1.27 versus 1.20 from the home side (1.24 on average for MP), translating to roughly 74% and 71% chances of scoring at least one goal. Seasonal clean sheet percentages are 33% for JäPS and 25% for MP, and average on-target shots 3.67 (JäPS) vs 4.25 (MP) suggest the visitors create slightly more chances and have a real opportunity to score. Considering MP’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the high xG for both teams (1.36 and 1.24) and recent goal averages 3.0 and 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 53% vs No at 47%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG for this match is about 1.36 for JäPS (1.4 xG for, 1.32 xG conceded by MP) and 1.24 for MP (1.27 xG for, 1.20 xG conceded by JäPS), totaling ≈2.60 expected goals. In the last 5 matches JäPS averaged 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded (3.6 goals per game), while MP averaged 1.8 scored and 2.4 conceded (4.2 total), indicating recently open, higher-scoring games. Seasonally, however, JäPS only averages 0.67 goals per game with 67% of matches under 2.5, MP 0.50 goals with 75% under 2.5, and the league averages 2.35 goals per game, which limits the probability of very high scores. Additionally, JäPS averages 12.33 shots (3.67 on target), MP 10.0 (4.25 on target), but the conversion rate is only 5%, so not all chances become goals. Considering the combined xG ≈2.60 and the very high recent goal figures (last 5 matches: JäPS 3.6, MP 4.2 average goals per game), the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (recommended). I assess full-match probabilities as follows: Over 1.5 ≈86%, Over 2.5 ≈60% (in the last 5 matches proportion of games above 2.5: JäPS 40% and MP 80%), and Over 3.5 ≈30% due to seasonal unders and low shot efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The home side shows a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 67% of matches (2 instances) and score an average of 0.67 goals by Half-Time compared to 0.25 for MP. Over the full match JäPS averages 0.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while MP averages 0.5 scored and 1.25 conceded, indicating low efficiency from both teams but a slight offensive edge for the hosts. xG favors JäPS 1.4 to 1.27 and the hosts attempt more shots per match (12.33 vs 10.0), while in the last 5 fixtures JäPS won 4 of 5 (80%) and averaged 3.0 goals, whereas MP has only a 40% win rate in that period and conceded 2.4 goals on average. Considering the hosts frequently take a lead at the break (67%) and show markedly better recent form, the most likely scenario is maintenance of that lead through full-time (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
JäPSMP
11Shots14
JäPSMP
5Shots on target7
JäPSMP
1.55xG1.73
JäPSMP
7Corners5
JäPSMP
70Dangerous attacks49
JäPSMP
9Fouls8
JäPSMP
2Cards0
JäPSMP

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game0.57
JäPSMP
0.86Goals allowed / game1.29
JäPSMP
42%Average possession52%
JäPSMP
3.57Shots on target / game4
JäPSMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8Shots per game11
JäPSMP
3.57Shots on target4
JäPSMP
12.5%Shot conversion5.2%
JäPSMP
42%Possession52%
JäPSMP
1.04xG for1.33
JäPSMP
1.56xG against1.27
JäPSMP

Shooting quality

JäPS: Counter-attackingMP: Balanced
JäPSMP
Accuracy (shots on target)45%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JäPS is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - JäPS · 1.2 pts / game - MP

JäPS
LWWWL
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
MP
LWWLL
Season result split
29% W0% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-5
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JäPS is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - JäPS · 0.57 goals / game - MP

JäPS is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.86 goals / game - JäPS · 1.29 goals / game - MP

JäPS scoring profile: strong

JäPS scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 meczów).

MP scoring profile: more difficult

MP scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)4
JäPSMP
6Goals conceded (season)9
JäPSMP
1.86Average goals per game1.86
JäPSMP
6Goals scored (last 5)4
JäPSMP
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
JäPSMP

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal57%
JäPSMP
29%2 goals0%
JäPSMP
14%3 goals0%
JäPSMP
0%4 goals0%
JäPSMP

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal71%
JäPSMP
14%2 goals29%
JäPSMP
14%3 goals29%
JäPSMP
14%4 goals0%
JäPSMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
JäPSMP
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JäPSMP
14%Scored in both halves0%
JäPSMP

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
JäPSMP
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JäPSMP
0%BTTS - last 540%
JäPSMP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
JäPSMP
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
JäPSMP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JäPSMP

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time43%
JäPSMP
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
JäPSMP
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
JäPSMP

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / game - JäPS · 1.57 pts / game - MP

JäPS - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
MP - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per game (1st half)1.57
JäPSMP
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.43
JäPSMP
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
JäPSMP
0.71Average goals (1st half)0.71
JäPSMP
86%Clean sheet before half-time71%
JäPSMP
57%No goal before half-time57%
JäPSMP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per game (2nd half)0.57
JäPSMP
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
JäPSMP
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1
JäPSMP
1.14Average goals (2nd half)1.14
JäPSMP
71%Clean sheet after half-time57%
JäPSMP
71%No goal after half-time86%
JäPSMP

JäPS - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

MP - second-half results

0% W57% R43% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JäPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
MP - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.60
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
4
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.86
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
15%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.76
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JäPSLigaMP
Average goals per game 1.862.35 1.86
Both teams scored 0%41% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%41% 29%
Clean sheets 71%35% 29%
Goal before half-time 57%56% 71%
Goal after half-time 57%65% 43%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Aleksi SainioOff: Jesse Nikki
  2. MPSubstitutionOn: Eero YlönenOff: Santeri Stenius
  3. MPSubstitutionOn: Veikko KarttunenOff: Serge Atakayi
  4. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Charles KatashiraOff: Maliki Salomon
  5. JäPSYellow cardAleksi Sainio
  6. JäPSYellow cardRiku Selander
  7. MPSubstitutionOn: Santtu SeppänenOff: Akseli Tervaniemi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of JäPS vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs MP?

JäPS score 1.00 goals per game on average and MP 0.57. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 29% of MP's.

What form are JäPS and MP in?

Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and MP 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs MP?

The statistical background for JäPS vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.