JäPS vs MP: match statistics
JäPS vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JäPS play MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. MP scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JäPS 27%, MP 47%. Over 2.5: JäPS 47%, MP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
MP has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.21. JäPS: 9.5 shots per match, MP: 9.9.
Match halves
JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40. MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back the home win (1). JäPS win 75% of home games, average 1.25 goals scored per home match and have scored 15 goals in the last 5 fixtures, winning 4 of 5. MP struggle away — 75% away defeats, concede 1.25 goals on average away and score only 0.5 goals on the road, with 50% of away matches goalless for them. Additionally, JäPS concede just 0.25 goals at home and record 75% clean sheets, while MP have only 25% clean sheets and conceded 12 goals in their last 5 games. Although MP have higher possession (51% vs 44%) and slightly higher away xG (1.27 vs 1.07), MP’s low shot conversion (5% vs 15% for JäPS) and poorer recent form (MP 1.2 pts vs JäPS 2.4 pts per game in the last 5) favor the home side.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JäPS | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JäPS is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - JäPS · 1 pts / match - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MP is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - JäPS · 1.27 goals / match - MP
JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JäPS
Over / Under — MP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JäPS
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JäPS | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.47 | 2.47 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of JäPS vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:2 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs MP?
JäPS score 0.93 goals per game on average and MP 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of JäPS's matches and 47% of MP's.
What form are JäPS and MP in?
Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and MP 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs MP?
The statistical background for JäPS vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.