JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: match statistics
JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JDFS Alberts played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
JDFS Alberts has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
JDFS Alberts scores 2.05 goals per game and allows 1.40. Metta - LU scores 4.30 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 3.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's games and 50% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 85%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.02 to 1.81 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 13.5 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 19.9.
First-half and second-half trends
JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 75% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (21 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.75 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU lead the table and have a clearly superior overall season record: 16 wins, 3 draws and just 1 defeat, with 86 goals scored and 16 conceded. Away from home, the visitors average 2.8 goals per match, create chances worth 2.41 xG and register 8.14 shots on target, while JDFS Alberts allow opponents 1.34 xG at home. Metta’s defense looks more solid, as they concede just 0.8 goals per away game, keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and have not lost any away fixture. However, the hosts are in good form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, and score an average of 2.1 goals at home with 1.95 xG, so they should pose a genuine threat to the favorites. Nevertheless, the visitors’ advantage in chance creation, possession at 61% compared with 53%, and defensive quality points to a slightly higher probability of an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is strong, as the hosts average 5.8 goals and the visitors 2.8, while neither team has finished a league match without scoring. Their attacking potential is supported by xG: JDFS Alberts create an average of 3.45 xG, while Metta - LU produce 2.41, with their respective opponents allowing 0.62 and 0.93 xG. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 2.2 goals and conceded 1.0, whereas the visitors scored as many as 3.6 goals while conceding 1.2, which favors an exchange of goals. The risk to the pick comes from both teams’ 50% clean-sheet rates and a season BTTS rate of 50%, but the high current attacking output gives the edge to the scenario in which each side scores at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of this match clearly favors goals: at least 2 goals were scored in 100% of JDFS Alberts’ matches and in 90% of Metta - LU’s fixtures. The 2.5 line also has strong support, having been surpassed in 90% and 80% of these teams’ matches respectively, compared with the league average of 71%. The hosts generate an average of 3.45 xG, while the visitors produce 2.41 xG; meanwhile, Metta have averaged as many as 3.6 goals per game across their last five appearances. Current form also confirms the attacking outlook, with JDFS’ last five matches producing 16 goals in total, compared with 24 goals for Metta. The safest edge lies with Over 1.5, as even with more conservative finishing, the data from both teams significantly reduces the risk of a match featuring no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JDFS Alberts were leading at the break in 9 of their last 10 matches, scoring an average of 3.5 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.1, which provides a very strong argument for the hosts holding the advantage in the first half. Metta - LU are also effective, but they average 1.0 goal before half-time away from home, while the hosts have kept a clean sheet at the break in 90% of their matches. Across the season, JDFS Alberts win 90% of their matches, score an average of 5.8 goals, and record an xG of 3.45 compared with 2.41 for the visitors. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation: they average 27 shots and 16 on target, while Metta record 18.71 and 8.14 respectively. The last five matches have been more evenly balanced, with the hosts leading at half-time in 60% of them and the visitors drawing at the break in 60%; therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a JDFS Alberts win remains a significant alternative, but 1/1 is the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 110% better for: goals scored per game.
2.05 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 4.3 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 0.8 goals / game - Metta - LU
JDFS Alberts scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 games), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 games).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (20 of 20 games), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 2.45 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +12 | +14 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (21 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.45 | 3.75 | ▲ 5.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 19% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JDFS AlbertsAssistKārlis Pirktiņš
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Metta - LU. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 1:3 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
JDFS Alberts score 2.05 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.30. The 1. Liga average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


