JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JDFS Alberts plays Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game is scheduled for September 19, 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss.
Recent form
JDFS Alberts has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
JDFS Alberts scores 2.05 goals per game and allows 1.40. Metta - LU scores 4.30 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 3.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's games and 50% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 85%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.02 to 1.81 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 13.5 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 19.9.
First-half and second-half trends
JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 75% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (21 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.73 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 110% better for: goals scored per game.
2.05 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 4.3 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 0.8 goals / game - Metta - LU
JDFS Alberts scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 games), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 games).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (20 of 20 games), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 2.45 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +12 | +14 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (21 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.45 | 3.73 | ▲ 5.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 19% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Metta - LU. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
When do JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU play?
JDFS Alberts face Metta - LU on September 19, 2026 in 1. Liga at Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
JDFS Alberts score 2.05 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.30. The 1. Liga average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.