JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: match statistics
JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JDFS Alberts played against Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
JDFS Alberts has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Riga FC II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
JDFS Alberts scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.53. Riga FC II scores 1.53 and allows 1.87. Games in this league average 3.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of JDFS Alberts's games and 60% of Riga FC II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 73%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.86 to 1.30 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 13.9 shots per game, while Riga FC II takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.27 goals per game after halftime. Riga FC II leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Riga FC II, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.49 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JDFS Alberts have a clear home advantage: they win 57% of their home matches, while Riga FC II win just 14% of their away games and lose as many as 71%. The hosts score an average of 2.14 goals at home with an xG of 2.10, whereas the visitors manage only 1.14 goals away and fail to score in 43% of such matches. The difference in chance creation is significant, with Alberts averaging 16 shots and 8.14 shots on target per game, compared with 8.2 shots and 3.6 on target for Riga FC II. The visitors’ defense also looks weak: they concede an average of 2.14 goals away from home, have an xG against of 1.85, and have kept no clean sheets. Although Riga FC II have won 3 of their last 5 matches overall, their poor away record and Alberts’ attacking potential point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear: BTTS occurred in 63% of JDFS Alberts’ matches and 57% of Riga FC II’s fixtures, against a league average of 63%. In the hosts’ last five appearances, both teams scored in as many as 80% of matches, while the visitors recorded this scenario in 60% of their games. JDFS Alberts score an average of 1.88 goals, while Riga FC II concede 2.14, strongly supporting a goal for the hosts. In turn, the JDFS Alberts defense allows opponents 1.63 goals per match, while Riga FC II score 1.14 on average; additionally, the visitors have kept no clean sheets this season. The high percentages of matches featuring over 2.5 goals—75% and 71%—along with both teams’ recent average of 1.8 goals scored, further strengthen the BTTS - Yes selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their league matches, providing an exceptionally strong signal for at least two goals. JDFS Alberts score an average of 1.88 goals per match, while Riga FC II concede as many as 2.14, with the hosts recording 6.25 shots on target per game compared to 3.60 for the visitors. Riga FC II average 1.14 goals scored, but Alberts’ defense concedes 1.63 goals on average, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario as well. In their last five matches, both teams scored 9 goals, while matches involving the visitors finished Over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases. The projected total of 3.15 goals also supports Over 2.5, although Over 1.5 has the highest probability and is the safest selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JDFS Alberts have a clear advantage in the full-season data: they won 63% of their matches and averaged 2.0 points per game, while Riga FC II won only 14% and lost 71%. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts held a lead at the break in 63% of their appearances, scoring an average of 1.25 goals, whereas the visitors were behind at half-time in 57% of matches and scored just 0.43 goals. Alberts also average 6.25 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.6, have the higher xG at 1.42 versus 1.13, and Riga FC II concede an average of 2.14 goals per match. The visitors’ form over their last five matches is better, with three wins and an average of 2.0 points, but this advantage does not offset the gap in away results and first-half performances. An Alberts lead at half-time followed by a win is therefore the most likely scenario, although the high average of 3.5 goals in the hosts’ matches increases the risk of a turnaround after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Riga FC II is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 2 pts / game - Riga FC II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JDFS Alberts is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.53 goals / game - Riga FC II
JDFS Alberts is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.53 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.87 goals / game - Riga FC II
JDFS Alberts scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 games), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 games).
Riga FC II scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 games), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Riga FC II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga FC II is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.53 pts / game - Riga FC II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JDFS Alberts
Riga FC II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.53 | 3.49 | • 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 85% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JDFS AlbertsGoalDāvis Indrāns
- JDFS AlbertsGoalDāvis Indrāns
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Riga FC II. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II?
The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 2:0 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JDFS Alberts and Riga FC II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches JDFS Alberts won 2, Riga FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II?
JDFS Alberts score 2.00 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.53. The 1. Liga average is 3.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 80% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 60% of Riga FC II's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Riga FC II in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Riga FC II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JDFS Alberts vs Riga FC II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


