Latvia - 1. LigaRīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekssData current as of September 06, 2026

JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II: match statistics

JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JDFS Alberts played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 25, 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

JDFS Alberts has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Super Nova II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

JDFS Alberts scores 2.15 goals per game and allows 1.62. Super Nova II scores 1.54 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 3.48 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 77% of JDFS Alberts's games and 69% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 77% and 46%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.19 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 14.4 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 7.9.

First-half and second-half trends

JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.38 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.48 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JDFS Alberts has a clear edge in key home metrics: they average 2.33 goals per home game with xG 2.15 and register 16.33 shots (8.83 on target), while Super Nova II away averages 1.5 goals with xG 1.21 and only 8.5 shots (4.5 on target). The hosts' defense also performs better — JDFS concedes 1.17 goals at home on average (xG against 1.43), whereas the visitors concede 2.0 goals away on average (xG against 1.96), indicating greater vulnerability at the back for Super Nova II. In the last 5 matches the hosts are 2-1-2 with 7 goals scored and 8 conceded and 1.4 points per game, while Super Nova II are 1-2-2 with 8 scored and 11 conceded and 1.0 point per game; this suggests superior short-term efficiency for the hosts. Additionally, the hosts win 67% of home fixtures versus the visitors' 17% away win rate, and the fact that Super Nova II have 0% clean sheets away (FTS 0%) increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. On that basis I tip a JDFS Alberts win, while noting that the visitors' shooting efficiency (conversion 18% vs. the hosts' 14%) can keep the result close to a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The statistical profile favors BTTS: season rates are 57% for JDFS Alberts and 83% for Super Nova II, with the league average BTTS at 60%. In the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS in 40% while the visitors in 80%, so the visitors’ recent form strongly supports Goal/Goal. Both teams have similar attacking xG (1.18 vs 1.21), and their season goals scored averages are 1.57 and 1.50 (total 3.07), with the visitors conceding 2.0 goals on average this season and 2.2 in the last 5. Shot stats show the visitors produce more shots on target (4.5 vs 3.5) and have higher conversion (18% vs 15%), while their clean sheet percentage is only 17% (home 29%), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on this, I select BTTS = Yes with an estimated 70% vs 30% for BTTS = No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match projects as offensive — JDFS Alberts scores an average of 1.57 goals per home match, while Super Nova II records 1.50 as visitors, yielding a combined average of 3.07 goals; in the last 5 matches JDFS scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), and Super Nova II 8 goals (1.6 avg). xG confirms a similar picture: JDFS offensive xG is 1.18 versus xG conceded by Super Nova II 1.96, implying about 1.57 expected goals for the hosts; meanwhile the visitors’ offensive xG 1.21 against the hosts’ defensive xG 1.52 suggests about 1.37 goals for the visitors, together ~2.94 xG. Additionally Super Nova II concedes on average 2.0 goals per match, and BTTS occurs in 57% of hosts’ matches and 83% of guests’ matches, increasing the chance of at least two goals; the league also has a high rate of matches over 2.5 goals (68%). A simple Poisson model for total xG ≈2.94 gives approximate probabilities: ~79% for Over 1.5, ~56% for Over 2.5 and ~34% for Over 3.5. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal — the total goals average, high BTTS (57%/83%) and the visitors’ weaker defense (2.0 conceded) all favor the Over side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JDFS Alberts led at the break in 4 appearances (57%), while Super Nova II led only once (17%), indicating a clear home advantage at Half-Time. The home side averages 1.0 goals in the first half versus 0.33 for the visitors and concedes only 0.29 goals before the break, whereas the visitors concede 1.17 goals on average before the break, so a home lead after 45 minutes is the most likely outcome. Over the full match, JDFS has a 57% win rate and averages 1.57 goals per match, while Super Nova II has a 17% win rate and concedes 2.0 goals per match, supporting a Full-Time victory for the hosts. However, the away team are more active after the break (1.17 goals on average in the second half and 83% of matches with a second-half goal), so turnaround scenarios (1/X or X/X) are possible, but the strongest signal remains 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
14Shots5
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
4Shots on target4
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.85xG0.78
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
7Corners2
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
96Dangerous attacks24
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
14Fouls8
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
0Cards0
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
2.15Goals scored / game1.54
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.62Goals allowed / game1.46
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
54%Average possession43%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
6.46Shots on target / game3.62
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.38Shots per game7.92
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
6.46Shots on target3.62
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
15%Shot conversion19.4%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
54%Possession43%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.9xG for1.19
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.22xG against1.74
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

Shooting quality

JDFS Alberts: AttackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)45%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JDFS Alberts is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1 pts / game - Super Nova II

JDFS Alberts
WDWLW
Season result split
54% W15% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.21Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Super Nova II
DLWDL
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-4
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

2.15 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.54 goals / game - Super Nova II

Super Nova II is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.62 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.46 goals / game - Super Nova II

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 meczów), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)20
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
21Goals conceded (season)19
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
3.77Average goals per game3
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
13Goals scored (last 5)8
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal85%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
54%2 goals46%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
38%3 goals23%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
23%4 goals0%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal77%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
46%2 goals23%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
15%3 goals15%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
15%4 goals8%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time15%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
8%BTTS in both halves0%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
23%Scored in both halves23%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
60%BTTS - last 580%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
77%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.62 pts / game - Super Nova II

JDFS Alberts - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per game (1st half)1.62
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.69
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.38
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
54%Clean sheet before half-time77%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
62%No goal before half-time46%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.77Points per game (2nd half)1.23
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
1.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
2.23Average goals (2nd half)1.62
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
23%Clean sheet after half-time31%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II
31%No goal after half-time46%
JDFS AlbertsSuper Nova II

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

46% W38% R15% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Super Nova II - second-half results

23% W54% R23% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JDFS Alberts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.81.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.42.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Super Nova II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.40.8
Average goals per game2.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
8
5
61-75
8
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

JDFS AlbertsLigaSuper Nova II
Average goals per game 3.773.48 3.00
Both teams scored 77%61% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%68% 46%
Clean sheets 15%22% 23%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.48
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.64
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Rihards Ozoliņš⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super Nova IIAssistAram Baghdasaryan
  2. JDFS AlbertsGoalRihards Ozoliņš

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Super Nova II. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II?

JDFS Alberts score 2.15 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 77% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 69% of Super Nova II's.

What form are JDFS Alberts and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II?

The statistical background for JDFS Alberts vs Super Nova II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.