South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Jeju United vs Anyang: match statistics

Jeju United crest
Jeju United
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Anyang crest
Anyang

Jeju United vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jeju United play Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Jeju United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Anyang: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jeju United scores 0.89 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.37 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jeju United 53%, Anyang 74%. Over 2.5: Jeju United 32%, Anyang 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Jeju United has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.27. Jeju United: 11.5 shots per match, Anyang: 9.7.

Match halves

Jeju United: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53. Anyang: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Jeju United: 16-30 (5 goals). Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 1-0-4. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 80%.

Match description

Anyang holds a clear advantage in offensive efficiency: the visitors scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches versus Jeju’s 4, and away they average 1.43 goals per match with a 15% conversion, while Jeju at home manages only 0.71 goals per match and a 6% conversion. Jeju generates more chances (on average 12.14 shots and 4.86 on target per match) and posts a higher home xG (1.46 vs Anyang’s 1.31 on the road), but this does not translate into goals — the hosts fail to score in 43% of home matches, while the visitors are shut out in only 14% of away games. Defensively both teams are fairly even in actual goals conceded (Jeju 1.14 at home vs Anyang 1.00 away), yet Anyang has a higher xG against on the road (1.75), indicating they allow higher-quality opponent chances. The goal differential confirms the visitors’ edge: Jeju at home has GD -3, Anyang away +3, with a substantially higher home loss rate for Jeju (43% vs 14%). Considering Anyang’s superior shooting efficiency and their goal-scoring form, I predict an away victory, although a draw is possible given both teams have averaged a comparable 1.2 points in the last 5 matches.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Jeju UnitedAnyang
26Shots11
Jeju UnitedAnyang
7Shots on target3
Jeju UnitedAnyang
2.73xG1.33
Jeju UnitedAnyang
5Corners2
Jeju UnitedAnyang
85Dangerous attacks57
Jeju UnitedAnyang
11Fouls9
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1Cards3
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.89Goals scored / match1.37
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1Goals conceded / match1.16
Jeju UnitedAnyang
45%Average possession43%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
4.16Shots on target / match3.95
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.47Shots per match9.74
Jeju UnitedAnyang
4.16Shots on target3.95
Jeju UnitedAnyang
7.8%Shot conversion14.1%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
45%Possession43%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1.41xG for1.27
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1.4xG against1.72
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Shooting quality

Jeju United: BalancedAnyang: Counter-attacking
Jeju UnitedAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)36%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Anyang is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Jeju United · 2 pts / match - Anyang

Jeju United
LDDWD
Season result split
32% W32% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-7
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Anyang
WLWDW
Season result split
32% W47% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-4
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Jeju United · 1.37 goals / match - Anyang

Jeju United is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Jeju United · 1.16 goals / match - Anyang

Jeju United scoring profile: very strong

Jeju United scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

17Goals scored (season)26
Jeju UnitedAnyang
19Goals conceded (season)22
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1.89Average goals in match2.53
Jeju UnitedAnyang
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Jeju UnitedAnyang
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Jeju UnitedAnyang

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal84%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
16%2 goals32%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%3 goals11%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%4 goals5%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal84%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
32%2 goals26%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%3 goals5%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%4 goals0%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time21%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
5%Scored in both halves26%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
80%BTTS - last 580%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Jeju United · 1.47 pts / match - Anyang

Jeju United - half-time state
26% leading47% draw26% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
26% leading68% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.47
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0.74Average goals (1st half)0.84
Jeju UnitedAnyang
68%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
68%No goal before half-time53%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Jeju UnitedAnyang
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Jeju UnitedAnyang
1.16Average goals (2nd half)1.68
Jeju UnitedAnyang
53%Clean sheet after half-time26%
Jeju UnitedAnyang
53%No goal after half-time37%
Jeju UnitedAnyang

Jeju United - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Anyang - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jeju United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Anyang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jeju United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jeju United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Jeju UnitedLigaAnyang
Average goals in match 1.892.31 2.53
Both teams scored 53%51% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 37%
Clean sheets 32%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 58%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 68%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Jeju United 1 - 0 - 4 Anyang. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Anyang
2 : 1
Jeju United
Jeju United FC
1 : 2
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
2 : 1
Jeju United FC
Jeju United FC
2 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
2 : 1
Jeju United FC

FAQ

What was the result of Jeju United vs Anyang?

The K League 1 match finished Jeju United 1:2 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jeju United and Anyang?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Jeju United won 1, Anyang won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jeju United vs Anyang?

Jeju United score 0.89 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.37. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Jeju United's matches and 74% of Anyang's.

What form are Jeju United and Anyang in?

Over the last 5 games Jeju United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Anyang 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jeju United vs Anyang?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jeju United vs Anyang: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.