South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju: match statistics

Jeonnam Dragons crest
Jeonnam Dragons
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Cheongju crest
Cheongju

Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jeonnam Dragons play Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Jeonnam Dragons: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jeonnam Dragons scores 1.12 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jeonnam Dragons 47%, Cheongju 76%. Over 2.5: Jeonnam Dragons 53%, Cheongju 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Jeonnam Dragons has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.41. Jeonnam Dragons: 11.9 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.2.

Match halves

Jeonnam Dragons: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.53. Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Jeonnam Dragons: 31-45+ (5 goals). Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Cheongju have drawn 5 of their last 5 matches and have 9 draws this season, while Jeonnam's last 5 show 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses (form dldld), indicating a strong points-sharing trend. Both teams have scored 11 goals this season, but Jeonnam have conceded 17 versus Cheongju's 15, and in the last 5 matches the home side conceded 7 goals versus 4 conceded by the visitors (17 vs 15 and 7 vs 4), pointing to a weaker Jeonnam defence. Chance-creation metrics favor Cheongju — away average xG is 1.28 against xG conceded 1.06, average shots 10.4 with 4.2 on target at 12% conversion and possession 54%, suggesting higher-quality chances. Nevertheless Cheongju have 0 wins this season and 40% of away matches without scoring, so they routinely convert advantages into draws, while Jeonnam have averaged 0.6 points per match in their last 5, limiting the hosts' potential for a full three points. Considering the higher xG and superior shooting stats for the visitors but the extreme draw tendency in both teams, I give the highest probability to a draw (50%), a 30% chance for the visitors to win and 20% for the hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
19Shots8
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
3Shots on target4
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
2xG1.2
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
13Corners1
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
83Dangerous attacks56
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
8Fouls7
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
2Cards0
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.12Goals scored / match1.18
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.82Goals conceded / match1.59
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
48%Average possession55%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
3.76Shots on target / match3.88
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.88Shots per match11.18
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
3.76Shots on target3.88
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
9.4%Shot conversion10.5%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
48%Possession55%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.46xG for1.41
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.57xG against1.3
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Shooting quality

Jeonnam Dragons: BalancedCheongju: Balanced
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cheongju is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Jeonnam Dragons · 1.4 pts / match - Cheongju

Jeonnam Dragons
LDDLW
Season result split
12% W35% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-9
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Cheongju
LWLDW
Season result split
12% W65% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-0
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cheongju is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Jeonnam Dragons · 1.18 goals / match - Cheongju

Cheongju is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Jeonnam Dragons · 1.59 goals / match - Cheongju

Jeonnam Dragons scoring profile: strong

Jeonnam Dragons scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Jeonnam Dragons keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

19Goals scored (season)20
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
31Goals conceded (season)27
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
2.94Average goals in match2.76
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal82%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
41%2 goals35%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
12%3 goals0%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
6%4 goals0%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
59%2 goals47%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
18%3 goals18%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
12%4 goals12%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time24%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
18%Scored in both halves24%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
40%BTTS - last 580%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cheongju is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Jeonnam Dragons · 1.29 pts / match - Cheongju

Jeonnam Dragons - half-time state
24% leading29% draw47% trailing
Cheongju - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.29
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.12
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
41%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
65%No goal before half-time47%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
29%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju
65%No goal after half-time47%
Jeonnam DragonsCheongju

Jeonnam Dragons - second-half results

29% W18% R53% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jeonnam Dragons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jeonnam Dragons
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jeonnam Dragons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Jeonnam DragonsLigaCheongju
Average goals in match 2.942.75 2.76
Both teams scored 47%61% 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 53%
Clean sheets 12%24% 24%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 82%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Jeonnam Dragons 2 - 1 - 0 Cheongju. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Cheongju FC
0 : 3
Jeonnam Dragons FC
Cheongju FC
2 : 2
Jeonnam Dragons FC
Jeonnam Dragons FC
4 : 1
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju?

The K League 2 match finished Jeonnam Dragons 2:2 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jeonnam Dragons and Cheongju?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jeonnam Dragons won 2, Cheongju won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju?

Jeonnam Dragons score 1.12 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Jeonnam Dragons's matches and 76% of Cheongju's.

What form are Jeonnam Dragons and Cheongju in?

Over the last 5 games Jeonnam Dragons have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cheongju 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jeonnam Dragons vs Cheongju: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.