JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene: match statistics
JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JFK Ventspils played Smiltene in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
JFK Ventspils: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Smiltene: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
JFK Ventspils scores 1.21 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Smiltene scores 1.14 and concedes 2.71. League average: 3.50 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JFK Ventspils 64%, Smiltene 50%. Over 2.5: JFK Ventspils 57%, Smiltene 57%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
JFK Ventspils has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.16. JFK Ventspils: 6.2 shots per match, Smiltene: 8.4.
Match halves
JFK Ventspils: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.57. Smiltene: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
JFK Ventspils: 16-30 (4 goals). Smiltene: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-0. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win. JFK Ventspils has a clear defensive advantage: at home they concede an average of 1.5 goals per game versus 3.0 conceded by Smiltene away, and xG against shows 1.45 vs 2.16 to the detriment of the visitors. Both teams’ attacks are weak – the hosts score 0.50 goals per game at home and still have no home wins (0% wins), while Smiltene scores 0.71 goals away despite having more shots (7.0 vs 5.83). In the last 5 matches Ventspils scored 6 and conceded 7, averaging 1.0 point per game, whereas Smiltene scored 8 but conceded 15 and has only 0.6 points per game. Considering the better xG for the hosts (1.11 vs 0.92), lower average goals conceded and the visitors’ worse away record (-16 vs -6), a home victory appears most likely with a moderate chance of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) because recent indicators strongly favor goals: seasonal BTTS is 57% for JFK Ventspils and 43% for Smiltene, but in the last 5 matches the home side shows 60% BTTS while the visitors have 80%. Smiltene have kept 0% clean sheets and concede an average of 3.0 goals per match in the season and 3.0 in the last 5 (15 conceded), which creates a high probability of a goal for the hosts, who average 1.57 goals and 5.0 shots on target per match. Conversely, JFK Ventspils are also vulnerable to goals (2.43 conceded per match in the season, 1.4 in the last 5) and their xG against is 1.98, while Smiltene’s last 5 xG for is 1.38 and they scored 8 goals in those five games (1.6 per match), so the visitors can score as well. Additionally, the league context reinforces the BTTS scenario: the league has a seasonal BTTS rate of 61% and an average of 3.49 goals per match, with over 2.5 occurring in 57% of games; therefore, considering Smiltene’s 0% clean sheets, 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches and defensive weaknesses on both sides, I assess the probability of BTTS at 75% versus 25% for No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and current form I estimate about 1.78 goals for JFK Ventspils (xG_for 1.40, xG against away 2.16) and 1.45 for Smiltene (xG_for 0.92, xG against home 1.98), totaling ~3.23 goals. Seasonal indicators show Over 1.5 occurred in 71% of JFK’s matches and 86% of Smiltene’s, while Over 2.5 appeared in 57%/57% of their games; the league average is 3.49 goals per match, which supports a minimum-two-goal scenario. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 6 and conceded 7 (avg 1.2 scored, 1.4 conceded), the visitors scored 8 and conceded 15 (avg 1.6/3.0), and both teams scored in 60% and 80% of those runs respectively, increasing the likelihood of goals from both ends. A Poisson model for total λ=3.23 yields ~83% probability for Over 1.5, 63% for Over 2.5 and 40% for Over 3.5; therefore I recommend playing Over on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JFK Ventspils has a clearly superior attack: on average 1.57 goals and xG 1.40 per match versus Smiltene’s 0.71 goals and xG 0.92, and 5.0 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 2.71. However, both teams do not score highly by half-time — the hosts average 0.43 goals, the visitors 0.14, and both record a 29% rate of draws at the break, so a draw at half-time appears likely. After the break Ventspils’ advantage increases: the hosts score an average of 1.14 goals in the second half, while the visitors concede an average of 1.71 goals in that period and have 100% of matches with at least one second-half goal, indicating a turnaround in favor of the hosts. Additionally Smiltene have yet to win away this season (winPercentage_away 0.0) and suffer 71% losses, so the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time result of draw at the break and home win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JFK Ventspils | Smiltene | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JFK Ventspils is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - JFK Ventspils · 0.6 pts / match - Smiltene
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JFK Ventspils is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - JFK Ventspils · 1.14 goals / match - Smiltene
JFK Ventspils is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - JFK Ventspils · 2.71 goals / match - Smiltene
JFK Ventspils scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Smiltene scores in 57% of matches (8 of 14 matches), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JFK Ventspils
Over / Under — Smiltene
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JFK Ventspils is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - JFK Ventspils · 0.71 pts / match - Smiltene
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Smiltene - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JFK Ventspils
Smiltene
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JFK Ventspils | Liga | Smiltene | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.93 | 3.50 | ▲ 3.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 70% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JFK VentspilsGoalValters Liepājnieks
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): JFK Ventspils 1 - 2 - 0 Smiltene. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene?
The 1. Liga match finished JFK Ventspils 1:2 Smiltene. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JFK Ventspils and Smiltene?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches JFK Ventspils won 1, Smiltene won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene?
JFK Ventspils score 1.21 goals per game on average and Smiltene 1.14. The 1. Liga average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 64% of JFK Ventspils's matches and 50% of Smiltene's.
What form are JFK Ventspils and Smiltene in?
Over the last 5 games JFK Ventspils have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Smiltene 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene?
The statistical background for JFK Ventspils vs Smiltene — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


