Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 20, 2026

JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II: match statistics

JFK Ventspils crest
JFK Ventspils
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JFK Ventspils played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

JFK Ventspils has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Super Nova II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

JFK Ventspils scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.73. Super Nova II scores 1.40 and allows 1.53. Games in this league average 3.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of JFK Ventspils's games and 67% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 47%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JFK Ventspils has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.11 per game. JFK Ventspils takes 6.3 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 7.3.

First-half and second-half trends

JFK Ventspils leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.73 after halftime.

When the teams score

JFK Ventspils's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.49 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Super Nova II sit 7th, while JFK Ventspils are 12th, and over the course of the season the visitors have collected 20 points compared with the hosts’ 11. However, the away side create significantly more danger on the road: they average 8 shots and 4.43 shots on target per match, compared with 6 and 2.57 for JFK, while also scoring 1.43 goals per game against the hosts’ 0.57. The Ventspils side have a serious problem with consistency in front of goal, having failed to score in 57% of their home matches and won none of them, losing 71%. The visitors are not entirely reliable defensively either, conceding an average of 1.86 goals away from home with an xG against of 1.94, giving the hosts an opportunity to convert their own xG of 1.14. Both teams have collected 5 points from their last five matches, while as many as 57% of Super Nova II’s away fixtures have ended in draws, making a stalemate the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by current form, as both teams produced this outcome in 80% of their last 5 matches. During this period, JFK Ventspils averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Super Nova II scored 1.2 and conceded 1.6 goals per match. The visitors have not kept a clean sheet once this season, while their average of 1.86 goals conceded and 1.94 xG against clearly increase the hosts’ chances of scoring. At the same time, Super Nova II have a season BTTS rate as high as 86%, compared with 50% for JFK Ventspils, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.47. Despite the visitors’ lower attacking xG over their last five appearances, at 0.69, their season average of 4.43 shots on target and the defensive weakness of both sides point slightly more strongly towards a goal for each team.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 63% of JFK Ventspils matches and in all Super Nova II fixtures. The hosts average 1.38 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.43, with Super Nova II conceding as many as 1.86 goals per game. The chance-quality model projects 1.42 expected goals for the hosts and 1.25 for the visitors, for a combined total of 2.67. In their last 5 matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, while both sides scored in 80% of each team’s matches. At the same time, Under 3.5 goals remains relatively likely, having occurred in 62% of JFK Ventspils matches and 86% of Super Nova II fixtures; however, the 1.5 line offers a clearly stronger safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JFK Ventspils have a clearly stronger first-half profile: they have led at the break in 50% of matches, while Super Nova II have been trailing after 45 minutes in 29%. The hosts average 0.88 goals scored before half-time and concede only 0.38, whereas the visitors score just 0.43 goals during this period while conceding 1.00. In their last five matches, Ventspils have led at the break in 60% of cases and have not been trailing in any of them, strengthening the scenario of an early home advantage. Over the full 90 minutes, the hosts win 50% of their matches, compared with just 14% victories for Super Nova II, whose defense concedes an average of 1.86 goals and 1.94 xG. The risk of a second-half equaliser remains significant, as the visitors draw as many as 57% of their matches, but the most likely individual HT/FT outcome remains Ventspils leading at half-time and securing the full-time win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
8Shots11
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
4Shots on target4
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.45xG1.41
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
6Corners2
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
93Dangerous attacks60
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
8Fouls15
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0Cards0
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.2Goals scored / game1.4
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.73Goals allowed / game1.53
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
42%Average possession44%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
2.8Shots on target / game3.47
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.27Shots per game7.33
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
2.8Shots on target3.47
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
19.1%Shot conversion19.1%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
42%Possession44%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.24xG for1.11
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.57xG against1.71
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

Shooting quality

JFK Ventspils: Counter-attackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)45%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JFK Ventspils
DWLDL
Season result split
13% W33% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-8
0.73 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova II
WDLDL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-5
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.69Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova II is 17% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - JFK Ventspils · 1.4 goals / game - Super Nova II

Super Nova II is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.73 goals / game - JFK Ventspils · 1.53 goals / game - Super Nova II

JFK Ventspils scoring profile: very strong

JFK Ventspils scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 games), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 games).

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 games), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 games).

18Goals scored (season)21
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
26Goals conceded (season)23
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
2.93Average goals per game2.93
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
7Goals scored (last 5)6
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal80%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
33%2 goals40%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
13%3 goals20%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0%4 goals0%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal80%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
53%2 goals27%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
27%3 goals20%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
7%4 goals7%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
20%Scored in both halves20%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
80%BTTS - last 580%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - JFK Ventspils · 1.6 pts / game - Super Nova II

JFK Ventspils - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1.6
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
53%Clean sheet before half-time73%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
47%No goal before half-time47%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per game (2nd half)1.07
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.6
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
40%Clean sheet after half-time27%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II
60%No goal after half-time53%
JFK VentspilsSuper Nova II

JFK Ventspils - second-half results

20% W27% D53% L
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding39%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova II - second-half results

20% W47% D33% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JFK Ventspils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.20
Goals scored / game1.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+5-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Super Nova II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JFK Ventspils
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JFK Ventspils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

JFK VentspilsLigaSuper Nova II
Average goals per game 2.933.49 2.93
Both teams scored 67%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%69% 47%
Clean sheets 13%21% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%74% 67%
Goal after half-time 73%85% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.49
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / game
1.59
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from JFK Ventspils's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Super Nova II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished JFK Ventspils 0:2 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II?

JFK Ventspils score 1.20 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.40. The 1. Liga average is 3.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 67% of JFK Ventspils's matches and 67% of Super Nova II's.

What form are JFK Ventspils and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games JFK Ventspils have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II?

The statistical background for JFK Ventspils vs Super Nova II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.