Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics
Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Super Nova II played against JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Super Nova II has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. JFK Ventspils has 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 0.67 points per game.
Scoring records
Super Nova II scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. JFK Ventspils scores 1.67 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova II's games and 67% of JFK Ventspils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 76% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JFK Ventspils has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 0.95 per game. Super Nova II takes 6.5 shots per game, while JFK Ventspils takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Super Nova II leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. JFK Ventspils leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Super Nova II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For JFK Ventspils, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.59 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 76% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Super Nova II have a 1-1-0 (3:2) record this season and in their last 5 matches recorded 1 win and 1 draw, averaging 2.0 points per game; at home they score 2.0 and concede 1.0 on average, registering 5 shots (2 on target) with a conversion rate of 40% and xG for 0.84 versus xG against 1.62. JFK Ventspils have a 0-2-1 (5:6) record and in their last 5 matches 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, averaging 1.0 point per game; away they score 3.0 and concede 3.0 on average, registering 13 shots (7 on target) with xG for 1.96 and xG against 1.77. The hosts’ main advantage is a lower goals conceded rate at home — 1.0 versus the visitors’ 3.0 conceded away — and a superior points per game average (2.0 vs 1.0). The visitors, however, create substantially more chances (13 shots and 7 on target versus 5/2 for the hosts) and have a higher xG, which increases their scoring probability; additionally, the share of matches without a goal is 0% for both teams, so both sides typically score. Considering the hosts’ defensive resilience and their high efficiency from fewer chances, I give Super Nova II a narrow edge and tip them to win (50% probability for the home side, 30% for a draw, 20% for the visitors).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly favor BTTS: JFK Ventspils has a seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring at 100% versus Super Nova II's 50%, while league-wide BTTS occurs in 64% of matches. Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, meaning neither Super Nova II nor JFK have kept a match without conceding (0.0% vs 0.0%). xG analysis shows the away side creates 1.96 xG per match versus the home 1.21 xG, and xG against is 1.77 for JFK and 1.31 for Super Nova II, indicating both sides both score and are exposed to conceding. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Super Nova II has BTTS 100% with average goals for and against 1.5 and 1.0, while JFK has BTTS 60% with averages 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded; the away advantage in shots and shots on target (13 vs 6 and 7 vs 3) increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. On this basis I assess BTTS as clearly more probable and recommend a "yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.49 goals for Super Nova II and 1.63 for JFK Ventspils, totaling 3.12 goals. JFK Ventspils scores on average 3.0 goals per match, records 7.0 shots on target and a 23% conversion rate, and 100% of their season’s matches finished Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 goals. Super Nova II averages 1.0 goals scored and concedes 1.5, with their matches exceeding 2.5 in 50% of cases, so combining both profiles increases the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Additionally the league averages 3.64 goals per match and 71% of fixtures >2.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5 and that is the side I recommend.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data clearly indicate an away advantage at half-time: the away side led at the break in 100% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0), while the home side was never leading at half-time (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 0.0). Offensively, the away team averages 3.0 goals per match versus 1.0 for the home team (seasonScoredAVG_away = 3.0 vs seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.0), and their xG is 1.96 compared to the home side’s 1.21, confirming a qualitative offensive edge. Shot statistics show 13.0 attempts and 7.0 on target for the away team versus 6.0/3.0 for the home team (shotsAVG_away = 13.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_away = 7.0 vs shotsAVG_home = 6.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 3.0), indicating greater goal threat from the visitors. The home team concedes an average of 1.5 goals before half-time (concededAVGHT_home = 1.5), while the away team has 100% clean sheets at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_away = 100.0); therefore the most likely scenario is the away team leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova II | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.75 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Super Nova II is 199% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Super Nova II · 0.67 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JFK Ventspils is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Super Nova II · 1.67 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
Super Nova II is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Super Nova II · 2 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
Super Nova II scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
JFK Ventspils scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Super Nova II
Over / Under - JFK Ventspils
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Super Nova II · 1 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Super Nova II
JFK Ventspils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova II | Liga | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 3.59 | • 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 18% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 0:0 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
Super Nova II score 1.50 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.67. The 1. Liga average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 76% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Super Nova II's matches and 67% of JFK Ventspils's.
What form are Super Nova II and JFK Ventspils in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova II vs JFK Ventspils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.