JIPPO vs KäPa: match statistics
JIPPO vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JIPPO play KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 13 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KäPa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.13 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JIPPO 47%, KäPa 60%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 40%, KäPa 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
JIPPO has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.40. JIPPO: 13.6 shots per match, KäPa: 11.1.
Match halves
JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. KäPa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). KäPa: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 3-1-0. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 75%.
Match description
The numbers indicate a draw is the most likely outcome: JIPPO records 60% of home matches ending in shared points, while KäPa has 20% draws away, yielding an average draw probability of roughly 40%. JIPPO dominates chance creation — 14.2 shots per match, home xG 1.75 (opponents’ xG 0.88) and 57% possession — and possesses a solid defense (0.4 goals conceded per match and 60% clean sheets). The hosts’ issue is finishing: only 0.4 goals per home match with shot conversion of 3 and 60% of matches goalless, which significantly reduces their xG advantage. KäPa are efficient away (1.2 goals per match, xG 1.26, conversion 13 and only 20% of matches without a goal), but concede on average 1.2 goals away and have just 20% clean sheets, favoring a balanced contest. As a result I project a draw as the safest outcome, with an approximate probability distribution of 30% home win, 40% draw and 30% away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JIPPO is 175% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - JIPPO · 0.8 pts / match - KäPa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.13 goals / match - KäPa
JIPPO is 119% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.6 goals / match - KäPa
JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
KäPa scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JIPPO
Over / Under — KäPa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - JIPPO · 1.4 pts / match - KäPa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JIPPO
KäPa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 44% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): JIPPO 3 - 1 - 0 KäPa. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs KäPa?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 3:0 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and KäPa?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 3, KäPa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KäPa?
JIPPO score 1.47 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.13. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of JIPPO's matches and 60% of KäPa's.
What form are JIPPO and KäPa in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KäPa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KäPa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JIPPO vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.