Finland - YkkösliigaJoensuun KeskuskenttäData current as of October 15, 2026

JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
0 : 1half-time 0:0
SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia

JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JIPPO played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

JIPPO has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

JIPPO scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.83. SJK Akatemia scores 0.44 and allows 1.39. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of JIPPO's games and 28% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 28%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.25 per game. JIPPO takes 13.0 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 10.3.

First-half and second-half trends

JIPPO leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JIPPO sit 4th, while SJK Akatemia are 10th, and the overall season record clearly favors the hosts: 8 wins and just 3 defeats compared with the visitors’ 1 win and 11 losses. At home, JIPPO concede an average of only 0.44 goals per match, keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, and limit opponents to an xG of 0.85. Away from home, SJK Akatemia score just 0.67 goals per match, fail to score in 56% of their outings, and have kept no clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.67 goals. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.79 compared with the visitors’ 1.28, while also registering 5.33 shots on target per match versus 2.56 for their opponents. The current form also favors JIPPO, who have collected 10 points from their last 5 matches, while SJK Akatemia have picked up only 3 points over the same period.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal is BTTS - No, as JIPPO recorded BTTS in just 11% of their matches this season, while failing to score in 78% of games. SJK Akatemia are also inconsistent in attack: they average 0.67 goals, failed to score in 56% of matches, and have a shot conversion rate of just 6%. The hosts have improved in their last five matches, averaging 1.4 goals with an xG of 1.40, while SJK Akatemia conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period, making a JIPPO goal a realistic scenario. At the same time, JIPPO’s defense allowed opponents an xG of 1.01 and conceded just 1.0 goal per game across their last five appearances, limiting the visitors’ chances of a response. Recent form raises the probability of both teams scoring to 43%, but the season-long struggles of both sides in front of goal still point more strongly towards at least one team failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profile clearly favors a lower-scoring outcome: JIPPO matches finished with under 2.5 goals in 89% of cases and under 3.5 goals in 100%, while for SJK Akatemia, these figures stand at 56% and 78%, respectively. The home side averaged just 0.22 goals, while the visitors averaged 0.67, with only 2.67 and 2.56 shots on target per match, respectively. Recent form has been more attacking, as JIPPO scored 7 goals in five matches and SJK Akatemia conceded 8; however, only 40% and 60% of those matches went over the 2.5-goal line. xG figures of 1.23 and 1.28 per match suggest some goal-scoring potential, but the home side’s very low shot conversion rate of 2% limits the risk of a high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line therefore has the strongest support, both from seasonal trends and from the limited finishing quality of both teams.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a JIPPO win at the final whistle, as both teams were level at the break in 56% of their matches this season, while SJK Akatemia recorded this outcome in as many as 80% of their last five games. First halves are typically very cautious: JIPPO average 0.11 goals scored before the break, SJK Akatemia record the same figure, and the hosts kept a clean sheet in the first half in 67% of their appearances. After the interval, the form advantage shifts to JIPPO, who averaged 0.8 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded in their last five matches, while the visitors conceded 1.0 goal in second halves. Across their last five fixtures, JIPPO won 60% of matches, scoring 1.4 goals per game and conceding 1.0, whereas SJK Akatemia failed to win any match, scoring 0.8 goals and conceding 1.6. In addition, the hosts have higher attacking xG averages than their goal-scoring efficiency suggests, while the visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.69 xG, supporting a JIPPO turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
23Shots5
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
10Shots on target3
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
2.8xG0.89
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
14Corners3
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
93Dangerous attacks49
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
8Fouls15
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0Cards4
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game0.44
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0.83Goals allowed / game1.39
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
53%Average possession50%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
4.67Shots on target / game2.61
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game10.28
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
4.67Shots on target2.61
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
10.3%Shot conversion4.3%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
53%Possession50%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
1.58xG for1.25
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
1.1xG against1.76
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

Shooting quality

JIPPO: BalancedSJK Akatemia: Balanced
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
Accuracy (shots on target)36%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JIPPO is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - JIPPO · 0.6 pts / game - SJK Akatemia

JIPPO
WWDWL
Season result split
44% W39% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-3
1.72 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK Akatemia
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
6% W33% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-6-11
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 202% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - JIPPO · 0.44 goals / game - SJK Akatemia

JIPPO is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.83 goals / game - JIPPO · 1.39 goals / game - SJK Akatemia

JIPPO scoring profile: very strong

JIPPO scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 games).

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: more difficult

SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of games (6 of 18 games), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 games).

24Goals scored (season)8
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
15Goals conceded (season)25
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
2.17Average goals per game1.83
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
7Goals scored (last 5)4
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal33%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
39%2 goals11%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
22%3 goals0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal83%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
17%2 goals44%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
11%3 goals11%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
6%BTTS in both halves0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
11%Scored in both halves0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
40%BTTS - last 560%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JIPPO is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - JIPPO · 0.72 pts / game - SJK Akatemia

JIPPO - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
SJK Akatemia - half-time state
6% leading56% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)0.72
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.11
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
1.06Average goals (1st half)0.72
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
72%Clean sheet before half-time56%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
61%No goal before half-time89%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)0.61
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.11
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia
56%No goal after half-time78%
JIPPOSJK Akatemia

JIPPO - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
26
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

6% W44% D50% L
13
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.72
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 6%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JIPPO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
SJK Akatemia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.60
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
2
8
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.99
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaSJK Akatemia
Average goals per game▼ 2.172.47▼ 1.83
Both teams scored• 44%44%▼ 28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 39%45%▼ 28%
Clean sheets▲ 44%31%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 61%64%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 61%71%• 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJK AkatemiaYellow cardCauet Werner Espíndola
  2. SJK AkatemiaYellow cardAlkhaly Momo Cissé
  3. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Terrence SmithOff: Nuutti Tykkyläinen
  4. SJK AkatemiaGoalOskar Pihlaja
  5. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Prosper PaderaOff: Nikola Vuksanović
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Aleksi TarvonenOff: Jyri Kiuru
  7. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Ilyes BerjaliOff: Oskar Pihlaja
  8. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Olavi KeturiOff: Eemeli Honkola
  9. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Oskari RaiskiOff: Cauet Werner Espíndola
  10. SJK AkatemiaYellow cardEerik Salmivuori
  11. SJK AkatemiaYellow cardHaralds Silagailis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from JIPPO's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against SJK Akatemia. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

SJK Akatemia
0 : 0
JIPPO
JIPPO
1 : 0
SJK Akatemia
Kerho 07 SJK II
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu
JIPPO Joensuu
3 : 1
Kerho 07 SJK II
Kerho 07 SJK II
3 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:1 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and SJK Akatemia?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 2, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?

JIPPO score 1.33 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.44. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 44% of JIPPO's matches and 28% of SJK Akatemia's.

What form are JIPPO and SJK Akatemia in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.