JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JIPPO played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
JIPPO has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
JIPPO scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.83. SJK Akatemia scores 0.44 and allows 1.39. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of JIPPO's games and 28% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 28%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.25 per game. JIPPO takes 13.0 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
JIPPO leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JIPPO sit 4th, while SJK Akatemia are 10th, and the overall season record clearly favors the hosts: 8 wins and just 3 defeats compared with the visitors’ 1 win and 11 losses. At home, JIPPO concede an average of only 0.44 goals per match, keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, and limit opponents to an xG of 0.85. Away from home, SJK Akatemia score just 0.67 goals per match, fail to score in 56% of their outings, and have kept no clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.67 goals. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.79 compared with the visitors’ 1.28, while also registering 5.33 shots on target per match versus 2.56 for their opponents. The current form also favors JIPPO, who have collected 10 points from their last 5 matches, while SJK Akatemia have picked up only 3 points over the same period.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal is BTTS - No, as JIPPO recorded BTTS in just 11% of their matches this season, while failing to score in 78% of games. SJK Akatemia are also inconsistent in attack: they average 0.67 goals, failed to score in 56% of matches, and have a shot conversion rate of just 6%. The hosts have improved in their last five matches, averaging 1.4 goals with an xG of 1.40, while SJK Akatemia conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period, making a JIPPO goal a realistic scenario. At the same time, JIPPO’s defense allowed opponents an xG of 1.01 and conceded just 1.0 goal per game across their last five appearances, limiting the visitors’ chances of a response. Recent form raises the probability of both teams scoring to 43%, but the season-long struggles of both sides in front of goal still point more strongly towards at least one team failing to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The season profile clearly favors a lower-scoring outcome: JIPPO matches finished with under 2.5 goals in 89% of cases and under 3.5 goals in 100%, while for SJK Akatemia, these figures stand at 56% and 78%, respectively. The home side averaged just 0.22 goals, while the visitors averaged 0.67, with only 2.67 and 2.56 shots on target per match, respectively. Recent form has been more attacking, as JIPPO scored 7 goals in five matches and SJK Akatemia conceded 8; however, only 40% and 60% of those matches went over the 2.5-goal line. xG figures of 1.23 and 1.28 per match suggest some goal-scoring potential, but the home side’s very low shot conversion rate of 2% limits the risk of a high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line therefore has the strongest support, both from seasonal trends and from the limited finishing quality of both teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a JIPPO win at the final whistle, as both teams were level at the break in 56% of their matches this season, while SJK Akatemia recorded this outcome in as many as 80% of their last five games. First halves are typically very cautious: JIPPO average 0.11 goals scored before the break, SJK Akatemia record the same figure, and the hosts kept a clean sheet in the first half in 67% of their appearances. After the interval, the form advantage shifts to JIPPO, who averaged 0.8 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded in their last five matches, while the visitors conceded 1.0 goal in second halves. Across their last five fixtures, JIPPO won 60% of matches, scoring 1.4 goals per game and conceding 1.0, whereas SJK Akatemia failed to win any match, scoring 0.8 goals and conceding 1.6. In addition, the hosts have higher attacking xG averages than their goal-scoring efficiency suggests, while the visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.69 xG, supporting a JIPPO turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JIPPO is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - JIPPO · 0.6 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 202% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - JIPPO · 0.44 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
JIPPO is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - JIPPO · 1.39 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
JIPPO scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 games).
SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of games (6 of 18 games), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JIPPO
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / game - JIPPO · 0.72 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 6%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JIPPO
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.17 | 2.47 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | • 44% | 44% | ▼ 28% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 45% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 71% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JIPPO's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against SJK Akatemia. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:1 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and SJK Akatemia?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 2, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
JIPPO score 1.33 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.44. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 44% of JIPPO's matches and 28% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are JIPPO and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


