JKT Tanzania vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
JKT Tanzania vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JKT Tanzania played against Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on June 18, 2026. Venue: Al-Hilal Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
JKT Tanzania has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Tanzania Prisons has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
JKT Tanzania scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.08. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.69 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of JKT Tanzania's games and 31% of Tanzania Prisons's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 38%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JKT Tanzania has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 0.96 per game. JKT Tanzania takes 7.0 shots per game, while Tanzania Prisons takes 4.0.
First-half and second-half trends
JKT Tanzania leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Tanzania Prisons leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.31 after halftime.
When the teams score
JKT Tanzania's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Tanzania Prisons, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.15 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are hosts JKT Tanzania (6th): across the season they have 28 goals scored and 28 conceded, while Tanzania Prisons (14th) have scored 18 and conceded 36. At home JKT average 1.08 goals scored and 0.77 conceded per match, with average xG 1.33 and xG against 1.04; visitors on the road score only 0.58 goals per match and concede 1.58 (xG for 1.23, xG against 1.6). JKT is also more efficient in finishing and defensively — shot conversion 13% versus Prisons 8%, on average 3.69 shots on target vs 2.89 and 46% of home matches with a clean sheet compared to 8% clean sheets for away Prisons. In the last five matches JKT have 1 win and 4 draws (8 scored, 7 conceded, 1.4 points per game), while Prisons have 3 wins and 2 losses (7:9, 1.8 points per game), however Prisons failed to score in 67% of their away matches, which limits their potential. Given JKT’s defensive edge, superior efficiency and ball control, I expect the hosts to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics favor a No Goal (BTTS - No): JKT averages 0.79 goals per match, Tanzania Prisons 0.58, home-season BTTS rate is 36% and away 25%, with league BTTS at 36%. Additionally, hosts have 43% clean sheets, visitors only 8%, and the league overall records 78% of matches with a clean sheet, all strongly supporting the “no” scenario. Contrastingly, the hosts’ last 5 matches show BTTS 80% with an average 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, while the visitors’ last 5 show 1.4 scored and 1.8 conceded, indicating both sides can exchange goals when in form. The visitors generate many chances (7.89 shots, 2.89 on target and xG 1.23) but convert only 8% of shots seasonally and average 0.58 goals per game, so their real scoring ability is limited; for that reason I assign 60% to 'no' and 40% to 'yes' (BTTS - No 60% / BTTS - Yes 40%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects a total of approximately 2.47 goals: 1.30 for JKT Tanzania and 1.17 for Tanzania Prisons. The projection is the average of seasonal and last-5 xG — hosts have seasonal xG_for 0.79 and last-5 xG_for 1.4, while visitors have seasonal xG_for 1.23 and last-5 xG_for 0.94; defenses show xG_against 1.10 (hosts) and 1.60 (visitors). A Poisson distribution on that mean yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈71%, Over 2.5 ≈45% and Over 3.5 ≈24%. Match stats support this conclusion — visitors average 7.89 shots (2.89 on target) with an 8% conversion and xG_for 1.23, hosts 3.17 shots (1.17 on target) with 26% conversion and xG_for 0.79, and in the last 5 matches both teams combined averaged 3.0 goals (1.6 + 1.4). Consequently I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the optimal option: it has ~71% chance and a clearer numerical edge compared to the 2.5 line (~45%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is the most likely outcome: the hosts led at the break in 3 of 14 home matches (21%), drew at half-time in 7 (50%) and trailed in 4 (29%). Average first-half goals are 0.50 for JKT versus 0.27 for Tanzania Prisons, with hosts conceding 0.71 on average and visitors 0.73. Over the full match the hosts have the edge in points and defensively: they score 0.79 goals per game and concede 1.21, earn 1.14 points per game versus the visitors' 0.58, and have a 29% home win rate compared to the visitors' 17% away win rate. Although the visitors generate higher xG (1.23 vs 0.79), their shot conversion rate is only 8% versus the hosts’ 26%, translating to just 0.58 goals per game for the visitors and limited away effectiveness. There is, however, a second-half signal favoring JKT: in the last five matches the hosts have averaged 1.0 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, while the visitors averaged 0.5 and won 0% of second halves. For these reasons the most likely course is a half-time draw and a home win at full-time (X/1), and I assign the highest probability in the proposed distribution to this scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JKT Tanzania | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.51 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tanzania Prisons is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - JKT Tanzania · 1.8 pts / game - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JKT Tanzania is 57% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - JKT Tanzania · 0.69 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons
JKT Tanzania is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - JKT Tanzania · 1.38 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons
JKT Tanzania scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 meczów).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 42% of games (11 of 26 meczów), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JKT Tanzania
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JKT Tanzania
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| JKT Tanzania | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.15 | 2.15 | • 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 36% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 38% | 39% | • 38% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 39% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 60% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 62% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from JKT Tanzania's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Tanzania Prisons. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 0:1 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Tanzania Prisons?
JKT Tanzania score 1.08 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.69. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 46% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 31% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are JKT Tanzania and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Tanzania Prisons?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


