Juárez vs Pumas UNAM: match statistics
Juárez vs Pumas UNAM: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Juárez played against Pumas UNAM in Liga MX (Mexico). The game was played on August 1, 2026. Venue: Estadio Olímpico Benito Juárez. Final score: 1:5.
Recent form
Juárez has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Pumas UNAM has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Juárez scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Pumas UNAM scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Juárez's games and 50% of Pumas UNAM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 100%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pumas UNAM has the higher season xG average, 0.97 to 0.94 per game. Juárez takes 9.5 shots per game, while Pumas UNAM takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Juárez leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Pumas UNAM leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Juárez's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Pumas UNAM, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga MX games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect an away win (Pumas UNAM): Juárez at home have 0 wins and a 100% loss rate, scoring an average of 0.0 goals per home match and failing to score in 100% of home games, while Pumas average 2.0 goals per away match and have scored at least once in all away fixtures. The hosts dominate possession (65% vs 34%) and attempt more shots (13 vs 8), but register only 1 on-target shot per game and have a conversion rate of 0%, explaining the lack of goals. The visitors average 3 on-target shots per match and convert 25% of attempts, resulting in more goals than their xG suggests (away xG 0.87 vs home xG 1.31), indicating high finishing efficiency. Additionally, Juárez have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches and average 0.6 points per game in that period, while Pumas conceded 6 goals in the last 5 and average 1.4 points per game, showing better points form for the visitors. Considering these figures (0.0 vs 2.0 avg goals, 1 vs 3 on-target shots per game, 100% home matches without a goal vs 0% for the visitors), I assign a 70% chance to a Pumas win, 20% to a draw and 10% to a Juárez win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) because the league has a high BTTS share at 61% and Pumas shows a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, strongly favoring the visitors scoring. Juárez conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per match) and has a seasonal goals conceded average of 3.0, while Pumas conceded 6 goals in the last 5 (1.2 per match) and 1.0 on the season, indicating vulnerability in both defenses. Offensively Juárez has an xG of 1.06 and averages 1.0 goal in the last 5, while Pumas has xG 0.87 and 0.8 goals in the last 5; Pumas registers 3.0 shots on target per match with a 25% conversion, whereas Juárez has 1.0 shot on target and 0% conversion on the season, so the higher likelihood of scoring lies with Pumas. Although Juárez’s seasonal BTTS is 0%, their last 5 matches show 60% BTTS, and the 60% vs 40% comparison in the last 5 plus the league 61% supports the assessment that a both-teams-to-score scenario is more likely. Therefore I assign a 70% probability to BTTS 'Yes' and 30% to 'No' — the main arguments being the 61% league BTTS share, Pumas’ 100% seasonal BTTS, Juárez’s high goals conceded average (2.0–3.0 per match) and Pumas’ advantage in shots on target and conversion (3.0 and 25% vs 1.0 and 0%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects total expected goals of 2.71: Juárez 1.45 (xG_for 1.06 vs opponent xG_against 1.84 yields 1.45) and Pumas 1.26 (xG_for 0.87 vs home xG_against 1.64 yields 1.26). Seasonally both teams have seasonOver25Percentage=100%, and the league average is 2.78 goals per game, which supports an Over 2.5 goals scenario. In the last 5 matches the over 2.5 rate is 60% for both sides, and Juárez conceded 10 goals in their last five fixtures (2.0 per game on average), increasing the likelihood of goals. Pumas average 3.0 shots on target per match versus Juárez’s 1.0 and have a 25% conversion rate; with 8 shots this suggests ~2.0 goals potentially generated by the visitors; these figures together reinforce Over 2.5 as the strongest signal. Over 3.5 is assessed as unlikely (seasonOver35=0% and expected 2.71 < 3.5), hence the recommendation: back Over on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data favor Pumas: the visitors average 2.0 goals per match versus 0.0 for Juárez and concede 1.0 on average compared to 3.0 conceded by the hosts, with the visitors’ win rate at 100.0% versus 0.0% for Juárez. Although Juárez have a higher xG (1.06 vs 0.87), their shot conversion rate is 0.0% versus 25.0% for Pumas, indicating they do not convert created xG into goals. Pumas, however, show low shooting activity in the first half (0 goals in the 0–45 min split in the data), while Juárez on average concede 2.0 goals by the break, so I expect a draw at 45 minutes. After the break the visitors’ advantage is clear: Pumas’ average second-half goals are 2.0 versus 0.0 for Juárez, and the visitors win 100.0% of second halves versus 0.0% for the hosts. Additionally Pumas average 3.0 shots on target versus 1.0 for Juárez, so the most likely final scenario is X/2 (draw at Half-Time, visitors win Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Juárez | Pumas UNAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 5% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Juárez is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Juárez · 2 goals / game - Pumas UNAM
Juárez scores in 0% of games (0 of 2 games), while Pumas UNAM keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
Pumas UNAM scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Juárez keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Juárez
Over / Under - Pumas UNAM
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Juárez - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pumas UNAM - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Juárez
Pumas UNAM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga MX).
Teams vs league
| Juárez | Liga | Pumas UNAM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.00 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 58% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 18% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 95% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Juárez's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Pumas UNAM. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Juárez vs Pumas UNAM?
The Liga MX match finished Juárez 1:5 Pumas UNAM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Juárez and Pumas UNAM?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Juárez won 1, Pumas UNAM won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Juárez vs Pumas UNAM?
Juárez score 0.00 goals per game on average and Pumas UNAM 1.00. The Liga MX average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Juárez's matches and 50% of Pumas UNAM's.
What form are Juárez and Pumas UNAM in?
Over the last 5 games Juárez have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Pumas UNAM 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Juárez vs Pumas UNAM?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


