Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of September 20, 2026

KA vs FH: match statistics

KA crest
KA
0 : 1half-time 0:0
FH crest
FH

KA vs FH: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KA played against FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on August 9, 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

KA has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FH has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

KA scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 2.06. FH scores 1.24 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.87 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of KA's games and 65% of FH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 53%, compared with league averages of 70% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FH has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.64 per game. KA takes 14.5 shots per game, while FH takes 13.6.

First-half and second-half trends

KA leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. FH leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.47 after halftime.

When the teams score

KA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For FH, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 3.87 goals. Both teams score in 70% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KA have slightly stronger arguments at home: they average 1.38 goals scored with an xG of 1.58, while FH allow opponents an xG of 2.20 away from home and concede as many as 2.50 goals per match. The hosts also register more shots, averaging 14.63 compared with 11.88, and hit the target more accurately, with 5 shots on target per game versus FH’s 4.13. However, KA’s home advantage is weakened by their form over the last five matches, during which they scored just 8 goals and won only once, while FH remain unbeaten in that period with 1 win and 4 draws. The visitors have also clearly improved their defensive organization, conceding just 3 goals in their last five outings, making a draw a realistic scenario. Nevertheless, FH’s poor finishing over the season as a whole, with 20 goals in 16 matches, and their 13% away win rate marginally favor KA.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded an identical share of matches with goals scored by both sides this season, at 63%, while the league average is even higher at 72%. KA creates plenty of chances at home, with an average xG of 2.00, along with 15.5 shots and 5.75 shots on target per match, whereas FH concedes as many as 2.50 goals per away game on average. The visitors also have attacking arguments, as their current xG from the last five matches stands at 2.05, while KA’s defense allowed opponents 2.13 xG and conceded an average of 2.0 goals over the same period. The main risk to the tip is FH’s defensive improvement: they have conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches. However, their season-long clean-sheet rate of just 13% still suggests that KA should find a way to score. A scenario in which both teams score is therefore marginally more likely, although the visitors’ defensive form reduces confidence in BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

KA averages 2.00 xG per match, while FH allows opponents 2.20 xG and concedes an average of 2.50 goals, clearly favoring goals for the home side. Both teams went over 1.5 total goals in 75% and 88% of their matches, respectively, while the league average is as high as 3.94 goals. In KA’s last five matches, games averaged 3.60 goals, as they scored 8 and conceded 10. FH has been more solid defensively recently, conceding only 3 goals in five appearances, but still generates 2.05 xG, while KA allows opponents 2.13 xG. Over 1.5 goals is the safest choice, as the 3.40-goal projection provides by far the largest margin over the line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KA have a clear first-half advantage: they were leading at the break in 50% of matches, while FH were trailing after 45 minutes in 63% of games. The hosts score an average of 1.00 goals before half-time and concede only 0.38, whereas FH score 0.63 goals during this period while conceding as many as 1.63, strongly supporting the scenario of a KA lead at the break. After the interval, however, the picture is less favourable for the hosts, who score just 0.25 goals per match and lose the second half in 63% of cases. FH have recently been difficult to beat, recording four draws in their last five matches without suffering a defeat, while also conceding only 0.6 goals per game during this period. The most likely outcome is therefore a scenario in which KA exploit their opponents' early weakness, but FH complete a turnaround and force a draw at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
KAFH
18Shots17
KAFH
5Shots on target3
KAFH
1.85xG1.66
KAFH
7Corners8
KAFH
51Dangerous attacks53
KAFH
13Fouls17
KAFH
4Cards5
KAFH

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.41Goals scored / game1.24
KAFH
2.06Goals allowed / game1.88
KAFH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.53Shots per game13.59
KAFH
4.82Shots on target4.88
KAFH
9.7%Shot conversion9.1%
KAFH
47%Possession44%
KAFH
1.64xG for1.68
KAFH
1.93xG against2.03
KAFH

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingFH: Balanced
KAFH
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FH is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - KA · 1.4 pts / game - FH

KA
LWDDL
Season result split
24% W18% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-10
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
FH
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
12% W47% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-8-7
0.82 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KA is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

1.41 goals / game - KA · 1.24 goals / game - FH

FH is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.06 goals / game - KA · 1.88 goals / game - FH

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 games), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).

24Goals scored (season)21
KAFH
35Goals conceded (season)32
KAFH
3.47Average goals per game3.12
KAFH
7Goals scored (last 5)5
KAFH
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
KAFH

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
KAFH
47%2 goals41%
KAFH
18%3 goals12%
KAFH
0%4 goals0%
KAFH

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal82%
KAFH
65%2 goals47%
KAFH
41%3 goals35%
KAFH
12%4 goals18%
KAFH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
KAFH
12%BTTS in both halves6%
KAFH
24%Scored in both halves6%
KAFH

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
KAFH
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
KAFH
60%BTTS - last 540%
KAFH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
KAFH
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
KAFH
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
KAFH

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
KAFH
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
KAFH
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
KAFH

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FH is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / game - KA · 1.24 pts / game - FH

KA - half-time state
18% leading29% draw53% trailing
FH - half-time state
29% leading35% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per game (1st half)1.24
KAFH
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.76
KAFH
1.12Goals conceded (1st half)1
KAFH
1.59Average goals (1st half)1.76
KAFH
35%Clean sheet before half-time47%
KAFH
65%No goal before half-time53%
KAFH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1
KAFH
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
KAFH
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
KAFH
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.35
KAFH
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
KAFH
35%No goal after half-time71%
KAFH

KA - second-half results

35% W35% D29% L
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FH - second-half results

24% W29% D47% L
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 12%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
FH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.00.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KA
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
10
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

FH
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaFH
Average goals per game 3.473.87 3.12
Both teams scored 65%70% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%70% 53%
Clean sheets 18%17% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%81% 76%
Goal after half-time 82%86% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.87
Average goals per game
70%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
2.16
Home goals / game
1.70
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KA's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against FH. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FH
1 : 2
KA
FH Hafnarfjördur
5 : 0
KA Akureyri
KA Akureyri
3 : 2
FH Hafnarfjördur

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs FH?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 0:1 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and FH?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KA won 2, FH won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs FH?

KA score 1.41 goals per game on average and FH 1.24. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 65% of KA's matches and 65% of FH's.

What form are KA and FH in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs FH?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.