KA vs FH: match statistics
KA vs FH: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KA played against FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on August 9, 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
KA has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FH has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KA scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 2.06. FH scores 1.24 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of KA's games and 65% of FH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 53%, compared with league averages of 70% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FH has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.64 per game. KA takes 14.5 shots per game, while FH takes 13.6.
First-half and second-half trends
KA leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. FH leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.47 after halftime.
When the teams score
KA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For FH, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.87 goals. Both teams score in 70% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KA have slightly stronger arguments at home: they average 1.38 goals scored with an xG of 1.58, while FH allow opponents an xG of 2.20 away from home and concede as many as 2.50 goals per match. The hosts also register more shots, averaging 14.63 compared with 11.88, and hit the target more accurately, with 5 shots on target per game versus FH’s 4.13. However, KA’s home advantage is weakened by their form over the last five matches, during which they scored just 8 goals and won only once, while FH remain unbeaten in that period with 1 win and 4 draws. The visitors have also clearly improved their defensive organization, conceding just 3 goals in their last five outings, making a draw a realistic scenario. Nevertheless, FH’s poor finishing over the season as a whole, with 20 goals in 16 matches, and their 13% away win rate marginally favor KA.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have recorded an identical share of matches with goals scored by both sides this season, at 63%, while the league average is even higher at 72%. KA creates plenty of chances at home, with an average xG of 2.00, along with 15.5 shots and 5.75 shots on target per match, whereas FH concedes as many as 2.50 goals per away game on average. The visitors also have attacking arguments, as their current xG from the last five matches stands at 2.05, while KA’s defense allowed opponents 2.13 xG and conceded an average of 2.0 goals over the same period. The main risk to the tip is FH’s defensive improvement: they have conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches. However, their season-long clean-sheet rate of just 13% still suggests that KA should find a way to score. A scenario in which both teams score is therefore marginally more likely, although the visitors’ defensive form reduces confidence in BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KA averages 2.00 xG per match, while FH allows opponents 2.20 xG and concedes an average of 2.50 goals, clearly favoring goals for the home side. Both teams went over 1.5 total goals in 75% and 88% of their matches, respectively, while the league average is as high as 3.94 goals. In KA’s last five matches, games averaged 3.60 goals, as they scored 8 and conceded 10. FH has been more solid defensively recently, conceding only 3 goals in five appearances, but still generates 2.05 xG, while KA allows opponents 2.13 xG. Over 1.5 goals is the safest choice, as the 3.40-goal projection provides by far the largest margin over the line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KA have a clear first-half advantage: they were leading at the break in 50% of matches, while FH were trailing after 45 minutes in 63% of games. The hosts score an average of 1.00 goals before half-time and concede only 0.38, whereas FH score 0.63 goals during this period while conceding as many as 1.63, strongly supporting the scenario of a KA lead at the break. After the interval, however, the picture is less favourable for the hosts, who score just 0.25 goals per match and lose the second half in 63% of cases. FH have recently been difficult to beat, recording four draws in their last five matches without suffering a defeat, while also conceding only 0.6 goals per game during this period. The most likely outcome is therefore a scenario in which KA exploit their opponents' early weakness, but FH complete a turnaround and force a draw at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KA | FH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FH is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - KA · 1.4 pts / game - FH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KA is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - KA · 1.24 goals / game - FH
FH is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.06 goals / game - KA · 1.88 goals / game - FH
KA scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).
FH scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 games), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KA
Over / Under - FH
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FH is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / game - KA · 1.24 pts / game - FH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 12%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KA
FH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| KA | Liga | FH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.47 | 3.87 | ▼ 3.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 65% | 70% | ▼ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 70% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | • 18% | 17% | • 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▼ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 86% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KA's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against FH. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KA vs FH?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 0:1 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KA and FH?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KA won 2, FH won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KA vs FH?
KA score 1.41 goals per game on average and FH 1.24. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 65% of KA's matches and 65% of FH's.
What form are KA and FH in?
Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs FH?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


