KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II: match statistics
KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KAA Gent II played against KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
KAA Gent II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. KRC Genk II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
KAA Gent II scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.17. KRC Genk II scores 1.00 and allows 1.91. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of KAA Gent II's games and 64% of KRC Genk II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 64%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KAA Gent II has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.19 per game. KAA Gent II takes 11.8 shots per game, while KRC Genk II takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
KAA Gent II's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For KRC Genk II, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KAA Gent II | KRC Genk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KAA Gent II is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 0.8 pts / game - KRC Genk II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KAA Gent II is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.42 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 1 goals / game - KRC Genk II
KAA Gent II is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 1.91 goals / game - KRC Genk II
KAA Gent II scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).
KRC Genk II scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
Over / Under - KRC Genk II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent II is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 0.82 pts / game - KRC Genk II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 42%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KRC Genk II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -7 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KAA Gent II
KRC Genk II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KAA Gent II | Liga | KRC Genk II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.58 | 2.71 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 48% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II?
The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 0:0 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II?
KAA Gent II score 1.42 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 1.00. The First Division B average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KAA Gent II's matches and 64% of KRC Genk II's.
What form are KAA Gent II and KRC Genk II in?
Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KRC Genk II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KAA Gent II vs KRC Genk II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.