Belgium - First Division BPlanet Group ArenaData current as of October 14, 2026

KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
3 : 2half-time 1:2
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KAA Gent II played against RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Planet Group Arena. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

KAA Gent II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. RFC Seraing has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

KAA Gent II scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.80. RFC Seraing scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.15 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of KAA Gent II's games and 67% of RFC Seraing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

RFC Seraing has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.08 per game. KAA Gent II takes 9.2 shots per game, while RFC Seraing takes 10.7.

First-half and second-half trends

KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

KAA Gent II's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For RFC Seraing, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 3.15 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KAA Gent II are the favorites, although their advantage is modest: they sit 10th, while RFC Seraing are 14th. Both teams have recorded one win and two draws in their last five matches, so recent form does not separate them. The visitors’ defensive record could prove decisive, as they concede an average of 2.33 goals per away game, compared with Gent’s 1.5 goals conceded at home. However, the hosts need to improve their finishing, having failed to score in half of their home matches, while their average xG is only 0.98, against Seraing’s 1.05 away from home. Neither side has yet won a home or away match, respectively, so despite the lean towards Gent, a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 67% of their matches, above the league average of 55%. Neither has kept a clean sheet yet, and Gent II concede an average of 1.67 goals, while Seraing concede 2.33, giving both sides a chance to score. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 1.8 goals per game, with Seraing scoring an average of 1.8 and Gent II 1.2. Caution is warranted, however, as Gent II score just 0.67 goals per game this season and failed to score in 33% of their matches. Their average xG of 1.62 nonetheless points to the potential to create chances. Therefore, a goal from each team looks more likely than BTTS - No, which means at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In the teams’ previous meetings, at least 2 goals were scored every time, making this the strongest indicator in favor of Over 1.5 goals. Gent II concede an average of 1.67 goals, while Seraing concede 2.33, so both defenses give their opponents opportunities to score. Over their last 5 matches, Gent II averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while Seraing averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.8 conceded. The projected total of 2.95 goals is also supported by the hosts’ xG of 1.62 and a league average of 3.07 goals per match. The 2.5 line is less certain, as it was cleared in 33% of Gent II’s matches and 67% of Seraing’s, making Over 1.5 goals the best pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is KAA Gent II leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time. The hosts led at half-time in 1 of their 3 matches, while RFC Seraing were trailing at that stage in 2 of 3, which points to an early Gent advantage. The hosts create more chances: their average xG is 1.62 compared with 1.05 for the visitors, and they average 6.33 shots on target against 3.33. After the break, Seraing conceded an average of 1.67 goals, so despite their attacking potential—as reflected in an average of 1.33 goals per match compared with Gent’s 0.67—the hosts’ ability to hold their lead has statistical backing. The pick remains uncertain, however, as both teams lost 2 of their 3 matches analyzed, and Gent have yet to score after half-time in those games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

69Possession (%)31
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
13Shots11
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
5Shots on target5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.42xG1.31
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
6Corners1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
34Dangerous attacks37
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Fouls16
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3Cards3
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.2Goals scored / game1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.8Goals allowed / game2
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
49%Average possession41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3.2Shots on target / game4.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.2Shots per game10.67
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3.2Shots on target4.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
13%Shot conversion9.4%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
49%Possession41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.08xG for1.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.86xG against1.38
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: Efficient finishingRFC Seraing: Balanced
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)35%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KAA Gent II is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 0.4 pts / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II
LWDLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
RFC Seraing
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent II is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 1 goals / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.8 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 2 goals / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent II scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: very strong

RFC Seraing scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

6Goals scored (season)6
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Goals conceded (season)12
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3Average goals per game3
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
6Goals scored (last 5)6
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal67%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%2 goals33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%3 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%2 goals83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%3 goals17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%BTTS in both halves0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Scored in both halves0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 580%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 1.17 pts / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)1.17
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Clean sheet before half-time33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%No goal before half-time50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per game (2nd half)0.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Clean sheet after half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%No goal after half-time83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KAA Gent II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
RFC Seraing - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.20
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaRFC Seraing
Average goals per game▼ 3.003.15▼ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 40%52%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%63%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 20%25%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%77%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▼ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.15
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RFC SeraingGoalAmine Messoussa
  2. RFC SeraingYellow cardVictor Corneillie
  3. RFC SeraingGoalTom LockmanAssist: Amine Messoussa
  4. KAA Gent IIYellow cardAbubakar Idris Abdullahi
  5. RFC SeraingYellow cardAnas Namri
  6. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Valerio Di CrescenzoOff: Tom Lockman
  7. KAA Gent IIYellow cardTrey Kongolo
  8. KAA Gent IIGoalDaniel James Wisdom
  9. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Nabil Bouchentouf IdrissOff: Alexandre Tunkadi
  10. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Joachim Djamba-ShangoOff: Mohammed El Âdfaoui
  11. KAA Gent IIYellow cardJemiah Umolu
  12. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Ruslan VydyshOff: Oleksandr Soroka
  13. KAA Gent IIGoalJemiah Umolu
  14. RFC SeraingYellow cardMoustapha Diop

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KAA Gent II's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against RFC Seraing. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

KAA Gent B
3 : 1
RFC Seraing
RFC Seraing
0 : 2
KAA Gent B

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 3:2 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KAA Gent II won 2, RFC Seraing won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

KAA Gent II score 1.20 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.00. The First Division B average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 40% of KAA Gent II's matches and 67% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RFC Seraing 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The statistical background for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.