Austria - 2. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering: match statistics

Kapfenberger SV crest
Kapfenberger SV
1 : 4half-time 1:4
Liefering crest
Liefering

Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kapfenberger SV play Liefering in 2. Liga (Austria). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Kapfenberger SV: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Liefering: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kapfenberger SV scores 1.10 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Liefering scores 1.62 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kapfenberger SV 59%, Liefering 48%. Over 2.5: Kapfenberger SV 62%, Liefering 52%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Liefering has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.25. Kapfenberger SV: 10.4 shots per match, Liefering: 14.4.

Match halves

Kapfenberger SV: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.76. Liefering: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Kapfenberger SV: 46-60 (11 goals). Liefering: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. Liga: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back Kapfenberger SV to win because at home they average 1.42 goals per match, while Liefering score only 0.75 on the road. The hosts also have significantly higher finishing efficiency — 13% shot conversion in home matches versus just 6% conversion for the visitors away — despite similar shot volumes (11.25 for Kapfenberger vs 13.08 for Liefering) and comparable shots on target (4.75 vs 4.67). Both defenses are vulnerable: Kapfenberger concede 1.33 goals at home and Liefering 1.25 away, while xG indicates an offensive edge for Liefering (away xG 1.63 vs hosts’ 1.37), which does not translate into goals due to the visitors’ low efficiency. Over the last 5 matches Kapfenberger have a goal record of 5–6 (2 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses) and 1.2 points per game, and Liefering 7–7 (2–1–2) with 1.4 points per game, showing slightly better form for the visitors but high instability. Considering the hosts’ superior shooting efficiency (13% vs 6%), better home goals average (1.42 vs 0.75) and a much higher home win rate for Kapfenberger (win% 42% vs 17% for visitors away), I assign Kapfenberger a 50% chance, draw 30% and Liefering win 20%.

Half-by-half

1 : 4
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
13Shots14
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
5Shots on target5
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.57xG1.74
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
2Corners3
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
55Dangerous attacks70
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
9Fouls3
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
3Cards1
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.1Goals scored / match1.62
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.83Goals conceded / match1.41
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
44%Average possession58%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
3.86Shots on target / match5.17
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.38Shots per match14.41
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
3.86Shots on target5.17
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
10.6%Shot conversion11.2%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
44%Possession58%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.25xG for1.72
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.73xG against1.24
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Shooting quality

Kapfenberger SV: BalancedLiefering: Dominant
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Liefering is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kapfenberger SV · 2.6 pts / match - Liefering

Kapfenberger SV
WLLLW
Season result split
31% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-16
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Liefering
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W31% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-7
1.66 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liefering is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kapfenberger SV · 1.62 goals / match - Liefering

Liefering is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Kapfenberger SV · 1.41 goals / match - Liefering

Kapfenberger SV scoring profile: strong

Kapfenberger SV scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Liefering keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Liefering scoring profile: very strong

Liefering scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Kapfenberger SV keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 matches).

32Goals scored (season)47
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
53Goals conceded (season)41
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
2.93Average goals in match3.03
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
6Goals scored (last 5)12
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal69%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
31%2 goals52%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
14%3 goals28%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
3%4 goals10%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal69%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
48%2 goals45%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
24%3 goals14%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
10%4 goals10%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time24%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
3%BTTS in both halves10%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
21%Scored in both halves17%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
60%BTTS - last 540%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liefering is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Kapfenberger SV · 1.38 pts / match - Liefering

Kapfenberger SV - half-time state
14% leading38% draw48% trailing
Liefering - half-time state
31% leading45% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)1.38
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.86
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.45
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
41%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
72%No goal before half-time55%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
52%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering
45%No goal after half-time59%
Kapfenberger SVLiefering

Kapfenberger SV - second-half results

38% W38% R24% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-25
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding221%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liefering - second-half results

34% W34% R31% P
40
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kapfenberger SV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.80.2
Average goals in match2.40.8
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-6+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Liefering - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+6+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kapfenberger SV
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
2
10
16-30
4
16
31-45
11
5
46-60
6
1
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Liefering
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
8
3
16-30
10
7
31-45
5
9
46-60
7
7
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+135%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kapfenberger SV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Liefering

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).

Teams vs league

Kapfenberger SVLigaLiefering
Average goals in match 2.932.68 3.03
Both teams scored 59%50% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%50% 52%
Clean sheets 10%29% 31%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 66%
Goal after half-time 72%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kapfenberger SV 0 - 0 - 1 Liefering. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Liefering
5 : 2
Kapfenberger SV

FAQ

What was the result of Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering?

The 2. Liga match finished Kapfenberger SV 1:4 Liefering. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering?

Kapfenberger SV score 1.10 goals per game on average and Liefering 1.62. The 2. Liga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Kapfenberger SV's matches and 48% of Liefering's.

What form are Kapfenberger SV and Liefering in?

Over the last 5 games Kapfenberger SV have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Liefering 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering?

The statistical background for Kapfenberger SV vs Liefering — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.