Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kariobangi Sharks vs Tusker: match statistics

Kariobangi Sharks crest
Kariobangi Sharks
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Tusker crest
Tusker
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Tusker displays significantly better away form with 67% wins and an impressive goal difference (+5) in away matches, while Kariobangi Sharks has only 30% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.11 goals per away match, which is considerably better than the hosts' 0.7 goals in home games. Tusker also holds a decisive advantage in clean sheets (56% vs 50%) and higher possession (48% vs 43%). Although Kariobangi's last five matches show solid form with no defeats (2 wins, 3 draws), Tusker remains the favorite due to their away efficiency and superior offensive statistics. The high percentage of draws stems from the defensive stability of both teams, but Tusker's offensive quality gives them the edge.

Kariobangi Sharks vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kariobangi Sharks play Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 13 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Kariobangi Sharks: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Tusker: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kariobangi Sharks scores 0.69 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Tusker scores 0.83 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kariobangi Sharks 41%, Tusker 34%. Over 2.5: Kariobangi Sharks 28%, Tusker 28%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Tusker has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.36. Kariobangi Sharks: 9.0 shots per match, Tusker: 10.9.

Match halves

Kariobangi Sharks: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.10. Tusker: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.21.

Goals by minute

Kariobangi Sharks: 0-15 (16 goals). Tusker: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Tusker displays significantly better away form with 67% wins and an impressive goal difference (+5) in away matches, while Kariobangi Sharks has only 30% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.11 goals per away match, which is considerably better than the hosts' 0.7 goals in home games. Tusker also holds a decisive advantage in clean sheets (56% vs 50%) and higher possession (48% vs 43%). Although Kariobangi's last five matches show solid form with no defeats (2 wins, 3 draws), Tusker remains the favorite due to their away efficiency and superior offensive statistics. The high percentage of draws stems from the defensive stability of both teams, but Tusker's offensive quality gives them the edge.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Kariobangi SharksTusker
8Shots11
Kariobangi SharksTusker
2Shots on target4
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1.15xG1.44
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1Corners6
Kariobangi SharksTusker
69Dangerous attacks64
Kariobangi SharksTusker
-1Fouls-1
Kariobangi SharksTusker
-1Cards-1
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.69Goals scored / match0.83
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.97Goals conceded / match0.93
Kariobangi SharksTusker
50%Average possession51%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
3.28Shots on target / match3.79
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.03Shots per match10.93
Kariobangi SharksTusker
3.28Shots on target3.79
Kariobangi SharksTusker
7.6%Shot conversion7.6%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
50%Possession51%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1.36xG for1.42
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1.33xG against1.4
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Shooting quality

Kariobangi Sharks: BalancedTusker: Balanced
Kariobangi SharksTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tusker is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Kariobangi Sharks · 0.8 pts / match - Tusker

Kariobangi Sharks
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W41% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Tusker
LWLDL
Season result split
41% W17% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tusker is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

0.69 goals / match - Kariobangi Sharks · 0.83 goals / match - Tusker

Kariobangi Sharks scoring profile: mixed

Kariobangi Sharks scores in 55% of matches (16 of 29 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Kariobangi Sharks keeps a clean sheet in 41% (12 of 29 matches).

20Goals scored (season)24
Kariobangi SharksTusker
28Goals conceded (season)27
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1.66Average goals in match1.76
Kariobangi SharksTusker
1Goals scored (last 5)1
Kariobangi SharksTusker
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Kariobangi SharksTusker

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal66%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
14%2 goals17%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0%3 goals0%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0%4 goals0%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal62%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
24%2 goals21%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
7%3 goals7%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
7%4 goals3%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
Kariobangi Sharks - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 29 matches
43%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time3%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
7%Scored in both halves3%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
20%BTTS - last 50%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

17%Min. 1 goal before half-time31%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
3%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

2nd half

14%Min. 1 goal after half-time21%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time7%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tusker is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Kariobangi Sharks · 1.1 pts / match - Tusker

Kariobangi Sharks - half-time state
7% leading83% draw10% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
14% leading69% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.1
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.1Goals scored (1st half)0.17
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.28Average goals (1st half)0.45
Kariobangi SharksTusker
90%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
90%No goal before half-time83%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.28
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.1Goals scored (2nd half)0.21
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.07
Kariobangi SharksTusker
0.24Average goals (2nd half)0.28
Kariobangi SharksTusker
86%Clean sheet after half-time93%
Kariobangi SharksTusker
90%No goal after half-time79%
Kariobangi SharksTusker

Kariobangi Sharks - second-half results

0% W97% R3% P
30
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tusker - second-half results

14% W86% R0% P
32
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kariobangi Sharks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kariobangi Sharks
ScoredConceded
16
20
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
14
20
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kariobangi Sharks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 80% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kariobangi SharksLigaTusker
Average goals in match 1.662.01 1.76
Both teams scored 41%43% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%33% 28%
Clean sheets 41%36% 38%
Goal before half-time 17%21% 31%
Goal after half-time 14%22% 21%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kariobangi Sharks 0 - 0 - 1 Tusker. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tusker
2 : 1
Kariobangi Sharks

FAQ

What was the result of Kariobangi Sharks vs Tusker?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Kariobangi Sharks 1:2 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kariobangi Sharks vs Tusker?

Kariobangi Sharks score 0.69 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.83. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Kariobangi Sharks's matches and 34% of Tusker's.

What form are Kariobangi Sharks and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games Kariobangi Sharks have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Tusker 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kariobangi Sharks vs Tusker?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.