Morocco - Botola ProStade de MarrakechData current as of 21 July 2026

Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kawkab Marrakech play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 17 June 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Stade de Marrakech. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kawkab Marrakech: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kawkab Marrakech scores 0.90 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kawkab Marrakech 47%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: Kawkab Marrakech 30%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.29. Kawkab Marrakech: 10.6 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.

Match halves

Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.40. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (9 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kawkab Marrakech has a clear advantage in offensive efficiency and home defense: the hosts score an average of 1.42 goals and keep a clean sheet in 42% of matches, while Ittihad Tanger score only 0.83 goals away and have 8% clean sheets. The hosts concede an average of 0.75 goals at home versus 1.17 conceded by the visitors on the road, while also registering more shots (11.25 vs 10.5), more shots on target (4.17 vs 3.33) and a higher conversion rate (13% vs 8%). xG analysis shows similar chance creation (home xG 1.39 vs away xG 1.35), but the visitors allow more expected goals against (xG against 1.48 vs 1.31), indicating weaker Ittihad defensive performance. Short-term form slightly favors Ittihad in points (last 5: 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, avg. 2.0 pts per game vs Kawkab 2-1-2 and 1.4 pts), so an upset is plausible. Considering the hosts’ superior efficiency and significant clean-sheet edge, I predict a Kawkab (1) win with probabilities: 60% home, 22% draw, 18% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
20Shots12
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
2Shots on target4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
2.07xG1.52
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
6Corners5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
95Dangerous attacks67
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
15Fouls14
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
4Cards4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.9Goals scored / match0.9
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.87Goals conceded / match1.03
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
42%Average possession49%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3.3Shots on target / match3.27
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.57Shots per match10.4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3.3Shots on target3.27
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
8.5%Shot conversion8.7%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
42%Possession49%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.29xG for1.3
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.31xG against1.48
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

Kawkab Marrakech: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech
LWDDD
Season result split
27% W40% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-10
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kawkab Marrakech is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech scoring profile: strong

Kawkab Marrakech scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)27
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
26Goals conceded (season)31
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
1.77Average goals in match1.93
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal67%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
23%2 goals23%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
7%3 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal80%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
20%2 goals20%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%3 goals3%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Kawkab Marrakech - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time10%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
13%Scored in both halves10%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
40%BTTS - last 540%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kawkab Marrakech is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.37 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech - half-time state
30% leading47% draw23% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.37Points per match (1st half)1.07
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.83
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
70%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
63%No goal before half-time70%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.37
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.1
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger
63%No goal after half-time53%
Kawkab MarrakechIttihad Tanger

Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results

17% W57% R27% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kawkab Marrakech - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kawkab Marrakech
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
1
16-30
9
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kawkab Marrakech

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Kawkab MarrakechLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 1.772.17 1.93
Both teams scored 47%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%38% 27%
Clean sheets 33%30% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 63%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kawkab Marrakech 0 - 1 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished Kawkab Marrakech 0:2 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

Kawkab Marrakech score 0.90 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Kawkab Marrakech's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are Kawkab Marrakech and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games Kawkab Marrakech have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kawkab Marrakech vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.