Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of September 01, 2026

KCB vs Tusker: match statistics

KCB crest
KCB
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Tusker crest
Tusker
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Tusker presents significantly better form than KCB, earning 2.4 points per match in the last five games compared to 2.0 for the hosts. The visitors stand out with an impressive away defense, conceding an average of only 0.5 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 63% of away fixtures. KCB has poor efficiency at their home stadium with just 33% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Tusker wins as many as 63% of their away matches and holds a positive goal difference (+4), which, combined with their current run of four victories in the last five matches, makes them the clear favorite in this clash.

KCB vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KCB played against Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on January 20, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

KCB has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tusker has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

KCB scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.94. Tusker scores 0.82 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.95 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 41% of KCB's games and 35% of Tusker's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tusker has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.42 per game. KCB takes 8.0 shots per game, while Tusker takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

KCB leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Tusker leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.35 after halftime.

When the teams score

KCB's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (10 goals). For Tusker, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kenyan Premier League games average 1.95 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tusker presents significantly better form than KCB, earning 2.4 points per match in the last five games compared to 2.0 for the hosts. The visitors stand out with an impressive away defense, conceding an average of only 0.5 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 63% of away fixtures. KCB has poor efficiency at their home stadium with just 33% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Tusker wins as many as 63% of their away matches and holds a positive goal difference (+4), which, combined with their current run of four victories in the last five matches, makes them the clear favorite in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
KCBTusker
7Shots6
KCBTusker
3Shots on target2
KCBTusker
0.99xG0.78
KCBTusker
6Corners2
KCBTusker
45Dangerous attacks35
KCBTusker
-1Fouls-1
KCBTusker
-1Cards-1
KCBTusker

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game0.82
KCBTusker
0.94Goals allowed / game1
KCBTusker
47%Average possession50%
KCBTusker
3Shots on target / game4.12
KCBTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8Shots per game11.88
KCBTusker
3Shots on target4.12
KCBTusker
12.5%Shot conversion6.9%
KCBTusker
47%Possession50%
KCBTusker
1.42xG for1.53
KCBTusker
1.18xG against1.45
KCBTusker

Shooting quality

KCB: Counter-attackingTusker: Balanced
KCBTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KCB is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - KCB · 1.2 pts / game - Tusker

KCB
WWLDW
Season result split
41% W24% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-6
1.47 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tusker
WLWLL
Season result split
41% W18% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCB is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - KCB · 0.82 goals / game - Tusker

KCB is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.94 goals / game - KCB · 1 goals / game - Tusker

KCB scoring profile: strong

KCB scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 meczów).

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while KCB keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)14
KCBTusker
16Goals conceded (season)17
KCBTusker
1.94Average goals per game1.82
KCBTusker
8Goals scored (last 5)4
KCBTusker
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
KCBTusker

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
KCBTusker
18%2 goals12%
KCBTusker
6%3 goals0%
KCBTusker
6%4 goals0%
KCBTusker

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal59%
KCBTusker
29%2 goals29%
KCBTusker
6%3 goals6%
KCBTusker
0%4 goals6%
KCBTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time6%
KCBTusker
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KCBTusker
0%Scored in both halves6%
KCBTusker

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
KCBTusker
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KCBTusker
60%BTTS - last 520%
KCBTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
KCBTusker
6%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
KCBTusker
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
KCBTusker

2nd half

29%Min. 1 goal after half-time35%
KCBTusker
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
KCBTusker
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KCBTusker

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KCB - half-time state
12% leading71% draw18% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per game (1st half)1.06
KCBTusker
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.24
KCBTusker
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
KCBTusker
0.35Average goals (1st half)0.71
KCBTusker
82%Clean sheet before half-time71%
KCBTusker
88%No goal before half-time76%
KCBTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per game (2nd half)1.47
KCBTusker
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
KCBTusker
0.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.12
KCBTusker
0.47Average goals (2nd half)0.47
KCBTusker
76%Clean sheet after half-time88%
KCBTusker
76%No goal after half-time65%
KCBTusker

KCB - second-half results

6% W88% R6% P
18
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding342%

Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tusker - second-half results

24% W76% R0% P
18
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding228%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KCB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.2
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KCB
ScoredConceded
10
10
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KCB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 59% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCBLigaTusker
Average goals per game 1.941.95 1.82
Both teams scored 41%42% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%31% 29%
Clean sheets 41%37% 41%
Goal before half-time 29%32% 47%
Goal after half-time 29%35% 35%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per game
42%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defensive advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
32%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
35%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from KCB's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tusker. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Tusker
0 : 2
KCB

FAQ

What was the result of KCB vs Tusker?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished KCB 1:2 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCB vs Tusker?

KCB score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.82. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 41% of KCB's matches and 35% of Tusker's.

What form are KCB and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games KCB have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tusker 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCB vs Tusker?

The statistical background for KCB vs Tusker — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.