Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK: match statistics
Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Keçiörengücü played against Manisa BBSK in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Keçiörengücü has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Manisa BBSK has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Keçiörengücü scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.14. Manisa BBSK scores 1.42 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Keçiörengücü's games and 50% of Manisa BBSK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 53%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Keçiörengücü has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.27 per game. Keçiörengücü takes 12.7 shots per game, while Manisa BBSK takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Keçiörengücü leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Manisa BBSK leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Keçiörengücü's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (16 goals). For Manisa BBSK, it is minutes 61-75 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win because Keçiörengücü averages 2.11 goals scored and concedes only 0.78 per match at home, while Manisa BBSK records 1.11 scored and 1.78 conceded away. The hosts create more chances — on average 14.22 shots and 5.22 on target per home game with a 15% conversion, whereas the visitors average 10.44 shots, 3.56 on target and an 11% conversion. Note also the xG: Keçiörengücü has an average home xG of 1.61, Manisa has xG 1.18 away, and this season the hosts have scored 67 goals versus 51 for the visitors, confirming offensive superiority. Defensively the gap is significant — the hosts register 44% clean sheets and only 17% home losses, while Manisa have 28% clean sheets away and 50% away losses. Considering higher quality chances, better conversion and a favorable home goal difference (+24 vs -12 for the visitors), I assign 66% to the hosts, 20% for a draw and 14% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project No BTTS as more likely, primarily due to Keçiörengücü's excellent defensive form: in their last 5 matches Keçiörengücü have 0% BTTS, scored 11 and conceded only 1 (0.2 goals conceded per game). Manisa have 20% BTTS in their last 5 matches and average 1.0 goal, while seasonally they score 1.11 goals with xG_for 1.18 and just 3.56 shots on target, indicating limited away attacking threat. Seasonal indicators are mixed – Keçiörengücü have a seasonal BTTS of 44% versus Manisa’s 56%, and the league average BTTS is 50%, but the league features 57% clean sheets, with hosts keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches (guests 28%), which favors the No BTTS option. Considering xG (home 1.37 vs away 1.18), advantage in shots on target (5.17 vs 3.56) and Keçiörengücü’s recent run (0.2 goals conceded on average), I assess the probability of No BTTS at 62% and BTTS at 38%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The analysis is based on xG and seasonal averages: Keçiörengücü scores on average 1.72 goals per season (xG 1.37), while Manisa concedes on average 1.78 goals (xG against 1.69), so I estimate an expected 1.60 goals for the home side. Manisa averages 1.11 goals per season (xG 1.18), and Keçiörengücü concedes 1.22, which after accounting for recent form yields 1.25 expected goals for the away side; the combined expectation is 2.85 goals. Seasonal over-1.5 rates are 72% for the home team and 78% for the away team, and a Poisson model with lambda=2.85 gives P(over 1.5) ≈78% and P(over 2.5) ≈54%, supporting a higher probability of more than 1.5 goals. Additionally, Keçiörengücü averages 5.17 shots on target versus Manisa’s 3.56 and has scored 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches (11 goals), therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time) because Keçiörengücü has superior season numbers: they average 1.72 goals per match versus Manisa’s 1.11 and concede 1.22 compared to 1.78 for their opponents. In the first half the hosts score 0.67 on average and led at the break in 33% of matches (40% in the last 5), while Manisa average 0.5 first-half goals and lead at the break in only 22% of cases. After the break Keçiörengücü are even stronger — they score 1.06 goals on average in second halves versus Manisa’s 0.61; the hosts win 50% of second halves and achieve an average of 1.78 points in second halves, which increases the chance of maintaining or extending a lead. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (5.17 vs 3.56) and have a higher xG (1.37 vs 1.18), while Manisa concedes on average 1.00 goal after the break, so the strongest signal is 1/1 (28%), with alternatives X/1 at 21% and X/X at 13%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Keçiörengücü | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Keçiörengücü is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Keçiörengücü · 1.8 pts / game - Manisa BBSK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Keçiörengücü is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.86 goals / game - Keçiörengücü · 1.42 goals / game - Manisa BBSK
Keçiörengücü is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Keçiörengücü · 1.5 goals / game - Manisa BBSK
Keçiörengücü scores in 81% of games (29 of 36 meczów), while Manisa BBSK keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 meczów).
Manisa BBSK scores in 75% of games (27 of 36 meczów), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Keçiörengücü
Over / Under - Manisa BBSK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Keçiörengücü is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / game - Keçiörengücü · 1.28 pts / game - Manisa BBSK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Keçiörengücü - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Manisa BBSK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Keçiörengücü
Manisa BBSK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Keçiörengücü | Liga | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.00 | 2.92 | • 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 29% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 80% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Keçiörengücü's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Manisa BBSK. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
The 1. Lig match finished Keçiörengücü 2:1 Manisa BBSK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
Keçiörengücü score 1.86 goals per game on average and Manisa BBSK 1.42. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Keçiörengücü's matches and 50% of Manisa BBSK's.
What form are Keçiörengücü and Manisa BBSK in?
Over the last 5 games Keçiörengücü have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Manisa BBSK 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK?
The statistical background for Keçiörengücü vs Manisa BBSK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


