Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics
Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kedus Giorgis played against Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on June 26, 2026. Venue: Addis Ababa Stadium. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Kedus Giorgis has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Fasil Ketema has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Kedus Giorgis scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 0.86. Fasil Ketema scores 0.75 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 1.77 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 31% of Kedus Giorgis's games and 28% of Fasil Ketema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 26% and 19%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kedus Giorgis has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.12 per game. Kedus Giorgis takes 8.2 shots per game, while Fasil Ketema takes 7.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Kedus Giorgis leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.37 goals per game after halftime. Fasil Ketema leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kedus Giorgis's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Fasil Ketema, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.77 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kedus Giorgis appears the favorite due to a clear advantage in form and home metrics. In the last 5 matches the hosts have 4 wins and 1 draw (PPG 2.6) with 7 goals scored, while Fasil Ketema recorded 3 wins and 2 losses (PPG 1.8) also with 7 goals. At home Kedus averages 1.00 goals scored and concedes only 0.61 per match, has xG 1.23 versus xG against 1.00 and a home goal difference of +7, whereas Fasil away posts 0.72 scored and 0.72 conceded (xG 1.14 vs 1.10) and a neutral goal balance. The hosts generate more shots (8.12 vs 7.29) and higher SOT (2.76 vs 2.18) with better conversion (12% vs 10%), and less frequently finish matches goalless (FTS 33% vs 44%). Given these offensive parameters and the hosts’ defensive stability, I rate them with a higher probability of victory, although the visitors’ solid defense (61% clean sheets on the road) keeps a draw as a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics favor the "no" scenario: Kedus Giorgis' season-long BTTS rate is 22% and Fasil Ketema's is 33%, both below the league BTTS average of 41%. Both teams frequently keep clean sheets — Kedus has 50% of matches without conceding, Fasil 61%, versus a league clean sheet rate of 81% — indicating No Goal is a common outcome. Season goal averages are low: Kedus 0.78 and Fasil 0.72 per match, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams scored 7 goals with average goals conceded 0.2 (Kedus) and 0.8 (Fasil), i.e. more shutouts than goal exchanges. xG is around 1.11 for Kedus and 1.14 for Fasil with xG against ~1.1 for both, but low shot conversion (11% and 10%) and a small number of shots on target (2.5 and 2.18) limit real goal output; therefore I rate BTTS - No at 75% versus Yes at 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have low seasonal goals averages: Kedus Giorgis scores 0.78 goals per match, Fasil Ketema 0.72; their xG is 1.11 (home) and 1.14 (away), totaling xG ≈ 2.23. A Poisson model on that combined xG suggests roughly a 65% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 39% chance of 3+ goals (Over 2.5). However, observed seasonal stats weaken that signal: home matches finished over 2.5 in only 17% of cases, away in 22% (avg ≈19.5%), and the league averages just 1.77 goals per game. Additionally, the home side has 50% clean sheets, the away team 61% clean sheets, and BTTS rates are low at 22% and 33%, indicating a higher probability of a low-scoring game. Therefore, although xG signals Over 1.5, the weight of seasonal outcomes and poor finishing (low SOT averages 2.5 and 2.18 and conversion rates 11% and 10%) favors Under 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the first half I expect a draw: a Half-Time draw occurs in 72% of matches, hosts score an average of 0.5 goals by the break vs 0.39 for visitors, and both teams keep a clean sheet at half in 89% of matches each. After the break hosts are more active — 72% of their matches feature at least one goal in the second half vs 50% for visitors, and hosts average 1.28 points in second halves vs 1.00 for visitors. Over the full match hosts are slightly stronger: season-long goals per match 1.56 vs 1.44 for visitors and 44% home wins vs 28% away wins, while in the last 5 matches hosts have a 80% win rate vs 60% for visitors. xG is balanced (1.11 vs 1.14) and shots on target are 2.5 vs 2.18, which suggests the outcome will be decided by finishing and a superior second half from the home side. Therefore the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a home victory Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kedus Giorgis | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kedus Giorgis is 44% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Kedus Giorgis · 1.8 pts / game - Fasil Ketema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kedus Giorgis is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - Kedus Giorgis · 0.75 goals / game - Fasil Ketema
Fasil Ketema is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.86 goals / game - Kedus Giorgis · 0.75 goals / game - Fasil Ketema
Kedus Giorgis scores in 57% of games (20 of 35 meczów), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 56% (20 of 36 meczów).
Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of games (21 of 36 meczów), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kedus Giorgis
Over / Under - Fasil Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kedus Giorgis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fasil Ketema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kedus Giorgis
Fasil Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kedus Giorgis | Liga | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.74 | 1.77 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 40% | ▼ 28% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 28% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 37% | 40% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Kedus GiorgisGoalFitsum Tilahun
Head-to-head
Record from Kedus Giorgis's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fasil Ketema. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Kedus Giorgis 1:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema?
Kedus Giorgis score 0.89 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.75. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Kedus Giorgis's matches and 28% of Fasil Ketema's.
What form are Kedus Giorgis and Fasil Ketema in?
Over the last 5 games Kedus Giorgis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema?
The statistical background for Kedus Giorgis vs Fasil Ketema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


