Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus: match statistics
Kendal Tornado presents impressive form at their home stadium with a 67% win rate and a +5 goal difference in home matches. The hosts have not lost a match at home this season, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games and scoring an average of 2 goals per match. Conversely, Persiku Kudus performs very poorly on the road, losing 75% of away matches and holding a negative goal difference (-2). The guests' away form is alarming – a streak of five consecutive losses (wllllllw) and a high rate of goals conceded (1.75 per match) indicate serious defensive problems. Kendal Tornado's advantage in possession (58% vs 56%), shot accuracy (15% vs 13%), and higher xG value (1.78 vs 1.06) further support the prediction of a home victory.
Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kendal Tornado played against Persiku Kudus in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 25, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Kendal Tornado has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Persiku Kudus has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Kendal Tornado scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.00. Persiku Kudus scores 1.38 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Kendal Tornado's games and 56% of Persiku Kudus's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 63%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kendal Tornado has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.07 per game. Kendal Tornado takes 8.8 shots per game, while Persiku Kudus takes 7.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Kendal Tornado leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.17 goals per game after halftime. Persiku Kudus leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.81 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kendal Tornado's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Persiku Kudus, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kendal Tornado presents impressive form at their home stadium with a 67% win rate and a +5 goal difference in home matches. The hosts have not lost a match at home this season, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games and scoring an average of 2 goals per match. Conversely, Persiku Kudus performs very poorly on the road, losing 75% of away matches and holding a negative goal difference (-2). The guests' away form is alarming – a streak of five consecutive losses (wllllllw) and a high rate of goals conceded (1.75 per match) indicate serious defensive problems. Kendal Tornado's advantage in possession (58% vs 56%), shot accuracy (15% vs 13%), and higher xG value (1.78 vs 1.06) further support the prediction of a home victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kendal Tornado | Persiku Kudus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 57% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kendal Tornado is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Kendal Tornado · 1.4 pts / game - Persiku Kudus
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - Kendal Tornado · 1.38 goals / game - Persiku Kudus
Kendal Tornado is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Kendal Tornado · 1.75 goals / game - Persiku Kudus
Kendal Tornado scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Persiku Kudus keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).
Persiku Kudus scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
Over / Under - Persiku Kudus
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Kendal Tornado · 1.38 pts / game - Persiku Kudus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persiku Kudus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 25%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kendal Tornado
Persiku Kudus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Kendal Tornado | Liga | Persiku Kudus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.62 | ▲ 3.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 46% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 69% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?
The Liga 2 match finished Kendal Tornado 0:0 Persiku Kudus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?
Kendal Tornado score 1.83 goals per game on average and Persiku Kudus 1.38. The Liga 2 average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kendal Tornado's matches and 56% of Persiku Kudus's.
What form are Kendal Tornado and Persiku Kudus in?
Over the last 5 games Kendal Tornado have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Persiku Kudus 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus?
The statistical background for Kendal Tornado vs Persiku Kudus — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.