Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueVið DjúpumýrarData current as of September 06, 2026

KÍ vs AB: match statistics

KÍ crest
2 : 1half-time 2:0
AB crest
AB

KÍ vs AB: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KÍ played against AB in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Venue: Við Djúpumýrar. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

KÍ has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. AB has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

KÍ scores 2.10 goals per game and allows 0.60. AB scores 1.30 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's games and 50% of AB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.95 to 1.24 per game. KÍ takes 15.6 shots per game, while AB takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

KÍ leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. AB leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

KÍ's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For AB, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KÍ has a clear defensive and form advantage: at home they concede an average of 0.5 goals per match and have 50% clean sheets, while AB concedes 1.6 goals on the road and has only 20% clean sheets. In attack the hosts score 2.0 goals per home game on average and have netted 12 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have only 1.0 goal away and 5 goals in their last five. In terms of chance quality (xG) both teams are similar (KÍ xG 1.27 vs AB xG 1.29), but KÍ converts much better — 22% shot conversion at home versus 9% for the visitors, with an average of 9 shots for the hosts and 11 shots for AB. Form confirms the hosts' edge: KÍ's last 5 matches show 3 wins and 2 draws with 2.2 points per game, while AB have not won any of their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering lower goals conceded, higher offensive efficiency and KÍ's unbeaten home record (0% losses), I favor a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS (Goal/Goal) as more likely based on recent form and team stats: KÍ has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60% and scores an average of 2.4 goals in the last five matches, while AB registered BTTS in 80% of their last 5 games and concedes an average of 2.0 goals. xG analysis supports this signal — KÍ has xG 1.91 in the last 5 matches with xG against 0.88, and AB has xG 1.28 while allowing 1.59 xG, indicating KÍ’s offensive strength and AB’s defensive issues. Additionally, KÍ averages 8.0 shots with a seasonal conversion of 20%, whereas AB averages 11.0 shots with a 9% conversion, so both sides create chances and KÍ is more clinical. Although KÍ has kept a clean sheet in 40% of matches this season and concedes 0.8 goals on average in the last 5, AB’s seasonal 16 goals conceded (1.6 avg) and 10 conceded in the last 5 increase the risk of goals from both sides. Therefore I forecast BTTS at 65% versus 35% for No Goal and select 'BTTS - Yes' as the strongest signal from the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis indicates an elevated probability of goals: KÍ scored 12 goals (avg 2.4) and conceded 4 (0.8) in their last 5 matches, while AB scored 5 (1.0) and conceded 10 (2.0) in their last 5. Seasonally the hosts average 1.6 goals per game versus 1.0 for AB, and Over 1.5 occurred in 100% of KÍ’s matches and 80% of AB’s matches, which strongly favors Over 1.5. A form-based xG model on the last 5 matches yields about 1.75 xG for KÍ (mean 1.91 vs 1.59) and 1.08 for AB (1.28 vs 0.88), total ~2.83 goals, which boosts the probability of at least 2 goals. Additionally KÍ has a high conversion rate of 20% with an average of 8 shots, while AB has 9% conversion on 11 shots and concedes an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5, so the best and strongest recommendation is Over 1.5 (with a reasonable option Over 2.5 ~62%), whereas Over 3.5 remains unlikely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KÍ led at the break in 4 of 5 matches (80%) and average 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.6, giving them a clear advantage in the first half. Over the longer term the hosts are also stronger: they average 1.4 points per game this season versus the visitors’ 0.8, and have a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches compared to 0% for AB in that period, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. AB create more chances (on average 11 shots and 4.0 on target per game versus KÍ’s 8 and 2.6) and have a slightly higher xG (1.29 vs 1.20), but their conversion is low (9% versus the hosts’ 20%), so the visitors’ pressure does not necessarily translate into goals. On that basis I predict the safest scenario is KÍ leading at the break and winning the match — I estimate 56% for 1/1, 16% for 1/X and 8% for 1/2, with a lower probability of a turnaround by AB (approximately 12% for 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
AB
17Shots8
AB
4Shots on target3
AB
1.94xG1.02
AB
8Corners1
AB
81Dangerous attacks40
AB
6Fouls10
AB
2Cards4
AB

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.1Goals scored / game1.3
AB
0.6Goals allowed / game1.6
AB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.6Shots per game9.5
AB
6Shots on target3.3
AB
13.5%Shot conversion13.7%
AB
62%Possession50%
AB
1.95xG for1.24
AB
0.88xG against1.64
AB

Shooting quality

: DominantAB: Efficient finishing
AB
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KÍ is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - KÍ · 0.4 pts / game - AB

DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
DWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.26Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
AB
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W20% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-5
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 62% better for: goals scored per game.

2.1 goals / game - KÍ · 1.3 goals / game - AB

KÍ is 167% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.6 goals / game - KÍ · 1.6 goals / game - AB

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).

AB scoring profile: strong

AB scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)13
AB
6Goals conceded (season)16
AB
2.7Average goals per game2.9
AB
8Goals scored (last 5)5
AB
3Goals conceded (last 5)10
AB

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
AB
40%2 goals40%
AB
30%3 goals10%
AB
30%4 goals0%
AB

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal70%
AB
0%2 goals40%
AB
0%3 goals30%
AB
0%4 goals20%
AB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time30%
AB
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AB
30%Scored in both halves30%
AB

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
AB
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
AB
60%BTTS - last 580%
AB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AB
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
AB
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
AB

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
AB
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
AB
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
AB

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / game - KÍ · 1.6 pts / game - AB

KÍ - half-time state
50% leading30% draw20% trailing
AB - half-time state
50% leading10% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per game (1st half)1.6
AB
1Goals scored (1st half)0.9
AB
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
AB
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.6
AB
70%Clean sheet before half-time40%
AB
40%No goal before half-time30%
AB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.9Points per game (2nd half)1.3
AB
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
AB
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
AB
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.3
AB
70%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AB
50%No goal after half-time60%
AB

KÍ - second-half results

50% W40% R10% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

AB - second-half results

40% W10% R50% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 30%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
AB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
5
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

AB
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

AB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaAB
Average goals per game 2.702.74 2.90
Both teams scored 60%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%48% 50%
Clean sheets 40%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 80%64% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%78% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ABYellow cardRagnar Skála
  2. Yellow cardJean Carlos de Brito
  3. ABYellow cardObule Sunday Moses
  4. SubstitutionOn: Dávid ReynheimOff: Erlend Hustad
  5. SubstitutionOn: Jonn JohannesenOff: Filip Brattbakk
  6. ABYellow cardJón Steingrímsson
  7. Yellow cardJean Carlos de Brito
  8. ABSubstitutionOn: Dánjal DanielsenOff: Sörin Samuelsen
  9. ABYellow cardMathias Birk Friis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from 's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against AB. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs AB?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 2:1 AB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs AB?

KÍ score 2.10 goals per game on average and AB 1.30. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's matches and 50% of AB's.

What form are KÍ and AB in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and AB 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs AB?

The statistical background for KÍ vs AB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.