KÍ vs AB: match statistics
KÍ vs AB: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KÍ played against AB in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Venue: Við Djúpumýrar. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KÍ has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. AB has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KÍ scores 2.10 goals per game and allows 0.60. AB scores 1.30 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's games and 50% of AB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.95 to 1.24 per game. KÍ takes 15.6 shots per game, while AB takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
KÍ leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. AB leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
KÍ's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For AB, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KÍ has a clear defensive and form advantage: at home they concede an average of 0.5 goals per match and have 50% clean sheets, while AB concedes 1.6 goals on the road and has only 20% clean sheets. In attack the hosts score 2.0 goals per home game on average and have netted 12 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have only 1.0 goal away and 5 goals in their last five. In terms of chance quality (xG) both teams are similar (KÍ xG 1.27 vs AB xG 1.29), but KÍ converts much better — 22% shot conversion at home versus 9% for the visitors, with an average of 9 shots for the hosts and 11 shots for AB. Form confirms the hosts' edge: KÍ's last 5 matches show 3 wins and 2 draws with 2.2 points per game, while AB have not won any of their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering lower goals conceded, higher offensive efficiency and KÍ's unbeaten home record (0% losses), I favor a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS (Goal/Goal) as more likely based on recent form and team stats: KÍ has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60% and scores an average of 2.4 goals in the last five matches, while AB registered BTTS in 80% of their last 5 games and concedes an average of 2.0 goals. xG analysis supports this signal — KÍ has xG 1.91 in the last 5 matches with xG against 0.88, and AB has xG 1.28 while allowing 1.59 xG, indicating KÍ’s offensive strength and AB’s defensive issues. Additionally, KÍ averages 8.0 shots with a seasonal conversion of 20%, whereas AB averages 11.0 shots with a 9% conversion, so both sides create chances and KÍ is more clinical. Although KÍ has kept a clean sheet in 40% of matches this season and concedes 0.8 goals on average in the last 5, AB’s seasonal 16 goals conceded (1.6 avg) and 10 conceded in the last 5 increase the risk of goals from both sides. Therefore I forecast BTTS at 65% versus 35% for No Goal and select 'BTTS - Yes' as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates an elevated probability of goals: KÍ scored 12 goals (avg 2.4) and conceded 4 (0.8) in their last 5 matches, while AB scored 5 (1.0) and conceded 10 (2.0) in their last 5. Seasonally the hosts average 1.6 goals per game versus 1.0 for AB, and Over 1.5 occurred in 100% of KÍ’s matches and 80% of AB’s matches, which strongly favors Over 1.5. A form-based xG model on the last 5 matches yields about 1.75 xG for KÍ (mean 1.91 vs 1.59) and 1.08 for AB (1.28 vs 0.88), total ~2.83 goals, which boosts the probability of at least 2 goals. Additionally KÍ has a high conversion rate of 20% with an average of 8 shots, while AB has 9% conversion on 11 shots and concedes an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5, so the best and strongest recommendation is Over 1.5 (with a reasonable option Over 2.5 ~62%), whereas Over 3.5 remains unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KÍ led at the break in 4 of 5 matches (80%) and average 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.6, giving them a clear advantage in the first half. Over the longer term the hosts are also stronger: they average 1.4 points per game this season versus the visitors’ 0.8, and have a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches compared to 0% for AB in that period, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. AB create more chances (on average 11 shots and 4.0 on target per game versus KÍ’s 8 and 2.6) and have a slightly higher xG (1.29 vs 1.20), but their conversion is low (9% versus the hosts’ 20%), so the visitors’ pressure does not necessarily translate into goals. On that basis I predict the safest scenario is KÍ leading at the break and winning the match — I estimate 56% for 1/1, 16% for 1/X and 8% for 1/2, with a lower probability of a turnaround by AB (approximately 12% for 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KÍ | AB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KÍ is 350% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - KÍ · 0.4 pts / game - AB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KÍ is 62% better for: goals scored per game.
2.1 goals / game - KÍ · 1.3 goals / game - AB
KÍ is 167% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.6 goals / game - KÍ · 1.6 goals / game - AB
KÍ scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).
AB scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KÍ
Over / Under - AB
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KÍ is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / game - KÍ · 1.6 pts / game - AB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KÍ - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
AB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 30%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KÍ
AB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).
Teams vs league
| KÍ | Liga | AB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.70 | 2.74 | ▲ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 29% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 78% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KÍ's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against AB. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KÍ vs AB?
The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 2:1 AB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs AB?
KÍ score 2.10 goals per game on average and AB 1.30. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's matches and 50% of AB's.
What form are KÍ and AB in?
Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and AB 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs AB?
The statistical background for KÍ vs AB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


