Kilmarnock vs Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kilmarnock played against Rangers in Premiership (Scotland). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Kilmarnock has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Rangers has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Kilmarnock scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.80. Rangers scores 1.36 and allows 0.93. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Kilmarnock's games and 64% of Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 43%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rangers has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.22 per game. Kilmarnock takes 10.4 shots per game, while Rangers takes 15.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Kilmarnock leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. Rangers leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kilmarnock's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Rangers, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premiership games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
KilmarnockRangers
15Shots11
KilmarnockRangers
3Shots on target6
KilmarnockRangers
1.47xG1.34
KilmarnockRangers
7Corners2
KilmarnockRangers
42Dangerous attacks30
KilmarnockRangers
17Fouls11
KilmarnockRangers
2Cards2
KilmarnockRangers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.07Goals scored / game1.36
KilmarnockRangers
1.8Goals allowed / game0.93
KilmarnockRangers
38%Average possession63%
KilmarnockRangers
3.87Shots on target / game5.29
KilmarnockRangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.4Shots per game15.21
KilmarnockRangers
3.87Shots on target5.29
KilmarnockRangers
10.3%Shot conversion8.9%
KilmarnockRangers
38%Possession63%
KilmarnockRangers
1.22xG for1.76
KilmarnockRangers
1.54xG against1.16
KilmarnockRangers

Shooting quality

Kilmarnock: BalancedRangers: Dominant
KilmarnockRangers
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rangers is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Kilmarnock · 2.2 pts / game - Rangers

Kilmarnock
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W40% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-7
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Rangers
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
36% W57% D7% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-1
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rangers is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.07 goals / game - Kilmarnock · 1.36 goals / game - Rangers

Rangers is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.8 goals / game - Kilmarnock · 0.93 goals / game - Rangers

Kilmarnock scoring profile: strong

Kilmarnock scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).

Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Rangers scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Kilmarnock keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)19
KilmarnockRangers
27Goals conceded (season)13
KilmarnockRangers
2.87Average goals per game2.29
KilmarnockRangers
4Goals scored (last 5)8
KilmarnockRangers
12Goals conceded (last 5)3
KilmarnockRangers

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal79%
KilmarnockRangers
33%2 goals43%
KilmarnockRangers
0%3 goals14%
KilmarnockRangers
0%4 goals0%
KilmarnockRangers

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal71%
KilmarnockRangers
60%2 goals21%
KilmarnockRangers
33%3 goals0%
KilmarnockRangers
7%4 goals0%
KilmarnockRangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time21%
KilmarnockRangers
7%BTTS in both halves7%
KilmarnockRangers
20%Scored in both halves43%
KilmarnockRangers

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
KilmarnockRangers
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KilmarnockRangers
80%BTTS - last 540%
KilmarnockRangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
KilmarnockRangers
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
KilmarnockRangers
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KilmarnockRangers

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
KilmarnockRangers
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
KilmarnockRangers
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
KilmarnockRangers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rangers is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - Kilmarnock · 1.71 pts / game - Rangers

Kilmarnock - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing
Rangers - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)1.71
KilmarnockRangers
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KilmarnockRangers
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
KilmarnockRangers
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.07
KilmarnockRangers
47%Clean sheet before half-time64%
KilmarnockRangers
53%No goal before half-time36%
KilmarnockRangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.29
KilmarnockRangers
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
KilmarnockRangers
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
KilmarnockRangers
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.21
KilmarnockRangers
40%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KilmarnockRangers
53%No goal after half-time43%
KilmarnockRangers

Kilmarnock - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rangers - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 36%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kilmarnock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Rangers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kilmarnock
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
6
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Rangers
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kilmarnock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).

Teams vs league

KilmarnockLigaRangers
Average goals per game 2.872.63 2.29
Both teams scored 60%51% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%52% 43%
Clean sheets 20%29% 29%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 79%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RangersSubstitutionOn: Findlay CurtisOff: Nedim Bajrami
  2. RangersYellow cardBojan Miovski
  3. RangersYellow cardNasser Yacouba Djiga
  4. KilmarnockYellow cardDavid Watson
  5. RangersGoalBojan MiovskiAssist: Nicolas Raskin
  6. RangersSubstitutionOn: Danilo Pereira da SilvaOff: Mohammed Diomande
  7. RangersGoalMikey MooreAssist: Jayden Meghoma
  8. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Ben BrannanOff: James Brown
  9. KilmarnockYellow cardDominic Thompson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Kevin ClancyMatches officiated: 13
3.38Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 262%Home wins15%Draws23%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Kilmarnock's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Rangers. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Rangers FC
3 : 1
Kilmarnock FC

FAQ

What was the result of Kilmarnock vs Rangers?

The Premiership match finished Kilmarnock 0:3 Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kilmarnock vs Rangers?

Kilmarnock score 1.07 goals per game on average and Rangers 1.36. The Premiership average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Kilmarnock's matches and 64% of Rangers's.

What form are Kilmarnock and Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Kilmarnock have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Rangers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kilmarnock vs Rangers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kilmarnock vs Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.