Kitara vs Calvary: match statistics
Kitara vs Calvary: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kitara played against Calvary in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Kitara has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Calvary has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Kitara scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 0.59. Calvary scores 0.41 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Kitara's games and 23% of Calvary's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 23%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kitara has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.21 per game. Kitara takes 10.1 shots per game, while Calvary takes 4.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Kitara leads at halftime in 64% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Calvary leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kitara's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). For Calvary, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kitara has a clear advantage at home: they have won 80% of home matches, score on average 2.1 goals and concede only 0.5 goals per game, giving a home goal difference of +16. Calvary have no away wins (0%), lose 91% of away fixtures, score 0.36 goals per game and fail to score in 73% of matches. In opportunity quality the hosts register 10.4 shots (4.8 on target) with a 20% conversion and have home xG 1.46 versus xG against 1.3, while the visitors average 8.3 shots (2.6 on target), a 5% conversion and xG for 1.14 on the road. Form also favors Kitara: in the last 5 matches the hosts collected 8 points (1.6 ppg) with a 2-2-1 record and goals 6:2, while Calvary have 4 points (0.8 ppg) with a 1-1-3 record and goals 3:7. Therefore I expect a home win and assess the probabilities at 82% for Kitara, 11% for a draw and 7% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are low: Kitara 18% and Calvary 27% versus a league average of 39%, and BTTS in the last 5 matches was only 20% for both teams. Calvary averages 0.36 goals this season and 0.6 in the last 5 (3 goals in 5), while Kitara has 1.2 goals in the last 5 (6 goals) and 0.45 for the season; at the same time Calvary concedes 1.4 goals in the last 5, and Kitara only 0.4, which reduces the visitors' chances of scoring. Seasonal goal figures show a large disparity: Kitara 31 scored and 13 conceded, Calvary 9 scored and 33 conceded, so the home side creates an offensive advantage while the visitors struggle with finishing. xG confirms the home advantage: Kitara xG_for 1.91 versus xG_against_away 1.82, and Calvary xG_for 1.14 against xG_against_home 1.66, which suggests limited real chances for the visitors. Additionally Kitara has 45% clean sheets this season (Calvary 9%), therefore I assess BTTS as less likely and recommend a NO (No Goal) selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kitara generates an expected xG of 1.91 per match, while Calvary concedes 1.82 xG, giving the hosts an estimated 1.87 goals; Calvary creates 1.14 xG and Kitara concedes 1.66 xG, yielding the visitors around 1.40 goals and a combined expected total of ~3.27 goals. Kitara averages 16 shots and 4.0 shots on target per match versus Calvary’s 8.3 and 2.6, and Calvary statistically concedes 2.18 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring affair. Using a Poisson distribution for a total of 3.27, the probability of at least 2 goals is ~84%, at least 3 goals ~63%, and 4+ goals ~41%. Considering the hosts’ offensive advantage and Calvary’s defensive vulnerability, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kitara is in better form — over the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points per game versus 0.8 for Calvary (1.6 vs 0.8), and they led at the break in 40% of those fixtures compared to 20% for their opponents (40% vs 20%). The home side creates significantly more chances: xG 1.91 versus 1.14 for Calvary, with an average of 16 shots and 4 shots on target compared to 8.3 and 2.6 (1.91 vs 1.14 xG; 16.0 vs 8.3 shots; 4.0 vs 2.6 shots on target). Calvary have not recorded a win this season (0% wins) and concede an average of 2.18 goals per match, which lowers their prospects of match success (0.0% and 2.18). At the same time, half-time draws are frequent: the hosts drew in 50% of first halves, the visitors in 45% (50% vs 45%), so a draw at the break is a statistically strong signal. As a result, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kitara victory at full-time, hence the HT/FT pick: X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kitara | Calvary | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kitara is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Kitara · 0.8 pts / game - Calvary
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitara is 244% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Kitara · 0.41 goals / game - Calvary
Kitara is 154% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.59 goals / game - Kitara · 1.5 goals / game - Calvary
Kitara scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).
Calvary scores in 27% of games (6 of 22 meczów), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kitara
Over / Under - Calvary
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 234% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.14 pts / game - Kitara · 0.64 pts / game - Calvary
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Calvary - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 5%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kitara
Calvary
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kitara | Liga | Calvary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.00 | 2.09 | ▼ 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 39% | ▼ 23% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 35% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 59% | ▼ 41% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Kitara's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Calvary. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kitara vs Calvary?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 0:0 Calvary. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Calvary?
Kitara score 1.41 goals per game on average and Calvary 0.41. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Kitara's matches and 23% of Calvary's.
What form are Kitara and Calvary in?
Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Calvary 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Calvary?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


