Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of September 13, 2026

Kitara vs Calvary: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Calvary crest
Calvary

Kitara vs Calvary: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kitara played against Calvary in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Kitara has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Calvary has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Kitara scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 0.59. Calvary scores 0.41 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 32% of Kitara's games and 23% of Calvary's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 23%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kitara has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.21 per game. Kitara takes 10.1 shots per game, while Calvary takes 4.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Kitara leads at halftime in 64% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Calvary leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.14 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kitara's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). For Calvary, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitara has a clear advantage at home: they have won 80% of home matches, score on average 2.1 goals and concede only 0.5 goals per game, giving a home goal difference of +16. Calvary have no away wins (0%), lose 91% of away fixtures, score 0.36 goals per game and fail to score in 73% of matches. In opportunity quality the hosts register 10.4 shots (4.8 on target) with a 20% conversion and have home xG 1.46 versus xG against 1.3, while the visitors average 8.3 shots (2.6 on target), a 5% conversion and xG for 1.14 on the road. Form also favors Kitara: in the last 5 matches the hosts collected 8 points (1.6 ppg) with a 2-2-1 record and goals 6:2, while Calvary have 4 points (0.8 ppg) with a 1-1-3 record and goals 3:7. Therefore I expect a home win and assess the probabilities at 82% for Kitara, 11% for a draw and 7% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are low: Kitara 18% and Calvary 27% versus a league average of 39%, and BTTS in the last 5 matches was only 20% for both teams. Calvary averages 0.36 goals this season and 0.6 in the last 5 (3 goals in 5), while Kitara has 1.2 goals in the last 5 (6 goals) and 0.45 for the season; at the same time Calvary concedes 1.4 goals in the last 5, and Kitara only 0.4, which reduces the visitors' chances of scoring. Seasonal goal figures show a large disparity: Kitara 31 scored and 13 conceded, Calvary 9 scored and 33 conceded, so the home side creates an offensive advantage while the visitors struggle with finishing. xG confirms the home advantage: Kitara xG_for 1.91 versus xG_against_away 1.82, and Calvary xG_for 1.14 against xG_against_home 1.66, which suggests limited real chances for the visitors. Additionally Kitara has 45% clean sheets this season (Calvary 9%), therefore I assess BTTS as less likely and recommend a NO (No Goal) selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kitara generates an expected xG of 1.91 per match, while Calvary concedes 1.82 xG, giving the hosts an estimated 1.87 goals; Calvary creates 1.14 xG and Kitara concedes 1.66 xG, yielding the visitors around 1.40 goals and a combined expected total of ~3.27 goals. Kitara averages 16 shots and 4.0 shots on target per match versus Calvary’s 8.3 and 2.6, and Calvary statistically concedes 2.18 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring affair. Using a Poisson distribution for a total of 3.27, the probability of at least 2 goals is ~84%, at least 3 goals ~63%, and 4+ goals ~41%. Considering the hosts’ offensive advantage and Calvary’s defensive vulnerability, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Kitara is in better form — over the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points per game versus 0.8 for Calvary (1.6 vs 0.8), and they led at the break in 40% of those fixtures compared to 20% for their opponents (40% vs 20%). The home side creates significantly more chances: xG 1.91 versus 1.14 for Calvary, with an average of 16 shots and 4 shots on target compared to 8.3 and 2.6 (1.91 vs 1.14 xG; 16.0 vs 8.3 shots; 4.0 vs 2.6 shots on target). Calvary have not recorded a win this season (0% wins) and concede an average of 2.18 goals per match, which lowers their prospects of match success (0.0% and 2.18). At the same time, half-time draws are frequent: the hosts drew in 50% of first halves, the visitors in 45% (50% vs 45%), so a draw at the break is a statistically strong signal. As a result, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kitara victory at full-time, hence the HT/FT pick: X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
KitaraCalvary
30Shots8
KitaraCalvary
6Shots on target4
KitaraCalvary
3.28xG1.19
KitaraCalvary
9Corners1
KitaraCalvary
134Dangerous attacks53
KitaraCalvary
-1Fouls-1
KitaraCalvary
-1Cards-1
KitaraCalvary

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.41Goals scored / game0.41
KitaraCalvary
0.59Goals allowed / game1.5
KitaraCalvary
44%Average possession20%
KitaraCalvary
4.27Shots on target / game0.86
KitaraCalvary

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.09Shots per game4
KitaraCalvary
4.27Shots on target0.86
KitaraCalvary
14%Shot conversion10.2%
KitaraCalvary
44%Possession20%
KitaraCalvary
1.54xG for1.21
KitaraCalvary
1.38xG against1.81
KitaraCalvary

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingCalvary: Balanced
KitaraCalvary
Accuracy (shots on target)42%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.30
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kitara is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Kitara · 0.8 pts / game - Calvary

Kitara
DWWDL
Season result split
64% W18% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-4
2.09 pts / game · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Calvary
LLLWD
Season result split
5% W27% D68% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-6-15
0.41 pts / game · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.52BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 244% better for: goals scored per game.

1.41 goals / game - Kitara · 0.41 goals / game - Calvary

Kitara is 154% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.59 goals / game - Kitara · 1.5 goals / game - Calvary

Kitara scoring profile: very strong

Kitara scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).

Calvary scoring profile: more difficult

Calvary scores in 27% of games (6 of 22 meczów), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)9
KitaraCalvary
13Goals conceded (season)33
KitaraCalvary
2Average goals per game1.91
KitaraCalvary
6Goals scored (last 5)3
KitaraCalvary
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
KitaraCalvary

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal27%
KitaraCalvary
36%2 goals14%
KitaraCalvary
18%3 goals0%
KitaraCalvary
9%4 goals0%
KitaraCalvary

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal73%
KitaraCalvary
9%2 goals32%
KitaraCalvary
0%3 goals23%
KitaraCalvary
0%4 goals18%
KitaraCalvary

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time9%
KitaraCalvary
5%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraCalvary
18%Scored in both halves0%
KitaraCalvary

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
KitaraCalvary
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KitaraCalvary
20%BTTS - last 520%
KitaraCalvary

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KitaraCalvary
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
KitaraCalvary
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KitaraCalvary

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time41%
KitaraCalvary
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
KitaraCalvary
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
KitaraCalvary

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 234% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.14 pts / game - Kitara · 0.64 pts / game - Calvary

Kitara - half-time state
64% leading23% draw14% trailing
Calvary - half-time state
5% leading50% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.14Points per game (1st half)0.64
KitaraCalvary
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.18
KitaraCalvary
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
KitaraCalvary
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.91
KitaraCalvary
82%Clean sheet before half-time55%
KitaraCalvary
36%No goal before half-time86%
KitaraCalvary

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per game (2nd half)0.77
KitaraCalvary
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
KitaraCalvary
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
KitaraCalvary
0.82Average goals (2nd half)0.73
KitaraCalvary
64%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KitaraCalvary
68%No goal after half-time91%
KitaraCalvary

Kitara - second-half results

18% W59% D23% L
47
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Calvary - second-half results

5% W64% D32% L
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 5%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kitara - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.20.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Calvary - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.60
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.40.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
8
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Calvary
ScoredConceded
4
10
0-15
0
6
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 39% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Calvary

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaCalvary
Average goals per game 2.002.09 1.91
Both teams scored 32%39% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 23%
Clean sheets 50%38% 27%
Goal before half-time 77%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 55%59% 41%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per game
39%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
0.81
Away goals / game
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Kitara's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Calvary. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs Calvary?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 0:0 Calvary. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Calvary?

Kitara score 1.41 goals per game on average and Calvary 0.41. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Kitara's matches and 23% of Calvary's.

What form are Kitara and Calvary in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Calvary 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Calvary?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.