Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 19 July 2026

Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Entebbe UPPC crest
Entebbe UPPC
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Kitara presents impressive home form with 75% wins and just 25% draws, remaining undefeated at home this season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring 7 goals while conceding only 3. Entebbe UPPC, despite a solid away form (63% wins), is characterized by a defensive style of play with low offensive efficiency - merely 1.38 goals per match and a 10% shot conversion rate. Kitara outperforms their rival in terms of scoring efficiency (16% conversion), average number of shots (11.5 vs 7.5), and shots on target (4.63 vs 2.25). Given the hosts' advantage in attack, their unbeaten home streak, and the fact that Entebbe has not scored in their last 5 away matches despite good results, I expect a victory for Kitara, although the visitors' solid defense may make this a close encounter.

Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara play Entebbe UPPC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 3 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Entebbe UPPC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Entebbe UPPC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 38%, Entebbe UPPC 23%. Over 2.5: Kitara 31%, Entebbe UPPC 17%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.34. Kitara: 11.3 shots per match, Entebbe UPPC: 6.0.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48. Entebbe UPPC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). Entebbe UPPC: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitara presents impressive home form with 75% wins and just 25% draws, remaining undefeated at home this season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring 7 goals while conceding only 3. Entebbe UPPC, despite a solid away form (63% wins), is characterized by a defensive style of play with low offensive efficiency - merely 1.38 goals per match and a 10% shot conversion rate. Kitara outperforms their rival in terms of scoring efficiency (16% conversion), average number of shots (11.5 vs 7.5), and shots on target (4.63 vs 2.25). Given the hosts' advantage in attack, their unbeaten home streak, and the fact that Entebbe has not scored in their last 5 away matches despite good results, I expect a victory for Kitara, although the visitors' solid defense may make this a close encounter.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
8Shots5
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
4Shots on target0
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
1.35xG0.88
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
3Corners3
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
76Dangerous attacks75
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
-1Fouls-1
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
-1Cards-1
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.72Goals conceded / match0.67
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
46%Average possession32%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
4.69Shots on target / match1.37
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.31Shots per match6
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
4.69Shots on target1.37
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
12.2%Shot conversion16.7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
46%Possession32%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
1.65xG for1.34
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
1.31xG against1.6
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingEntebbe UPPC: Counter-attacking
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
Accuracy (shots on target)41%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.73

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Entebbe UPPC is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kitara · 2.2 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC

Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Entebbe UPPC
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W30% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-7
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Kitara · 1 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

Entebbe UPPC is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Kitara · 0.67 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

Kitara scoring profile: mixed

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: mixed

Entebbe UPPC scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)30
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
21Goals conceded (season)20
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
2.1Average goals in match1.67
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
7Goals scored (last 5)9
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
7Goals conceded (last 5)1
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal60%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
41%2 goals27%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
14%3 goals7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
7%4 goals7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal47%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
14%2 goals17%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
3%3 goals3%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0%4 goals0%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
3%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
21%Scored in both halves10%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
60%BTTS - last 520%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time30%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Kitara · 1.47 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC

Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing
Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
27% leading67% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.47
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.37
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
1.24Average goals (1st half)0.53
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
76%Clean sheet before half-time87%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
38%No goal before half-time67%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.2
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.47
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
62%Clean sheet after half-time87%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC
66%No goal after half-time83%
KitaraEntebbe UPPC

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

17% W70% R13% P
44
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Entebbe UPPC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
14
11
0-15
1
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaEntebbe UPPC
Average goals in match 2.102.09 1.67
Both teams scored 38%38% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%35% 17%
Clean sheets 45%39% 53%
Goal before half-time 76%59% 40%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 30%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 0 - 0 - 1 Entebbe UPPC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 2:0 Entebbe UPPC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC?

Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and Entebbe UPPC 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kitara's matches and 23% of Entebbe UPPC's.

What form are Kitara and Entebbe UPPC in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Entebbe UPPC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kitara vs Entebbe UPPC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.