Kitara vs Maroons: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara play Maroons in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 12 December 2025 at 14:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Maroons: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Maroons scores 0.87 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 38%, Maroons 30%. Over 2.5: Kitara 31%, Maroons 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.24. Kitara: 11.3 shots per match, Maroons: 8.5.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48. Maroons: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.37.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). Maroons: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
KitaraMaroons
14Shots8
KitaraMaroons
7Shots on target4
KitaraMaroons
0xG0
KitaraMaroons
1Corners2
KitaraMaroons
0Dangerous attacks0
KitaraMaroons
28Fouls14
KitaraMaroons
0Cards0
KitaraMaroons

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.87
KitaraMaroons
0.72Goals conceded / match0.9
KitaraMaroons
46%Average possession46%
KitaraMaroons
4.69Shots on target / match2.83
KitaraMaroons

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.31Shots per match8.53
KitaraMaroons
4.69Shots on target2.83
KitaraMaroons
12.2%Shot conversion10.2%
KitaraMaroons
46%Possession46%
KitaraMaroons
1.65xG for1.24
KitaraMaroons
1.31xG against1.32
KitaraMaroons

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingMaroons: Balanced
KitaraMaroons
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Maroons
DLDLW
Season result split
30% W37% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Kitara · 0.87 goals / match - Maroons

Kitara is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Kitara · 0.9 goals / match - Maroons

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Maroons keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Maroons scoring profile: mixed

Maroons scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)26
KitaraMaroons
21Goals conceded (season)27
KitaraMaroons
2.1Average goals in match1.77
KitaraMaroons
7Goals scored (last 5)3
KitaraMaroons
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
KitaraMaroons

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal53%
KitaraMaroons
41%2 goals20%
KitaraMaroons
14%3 goals10%
KitaraMaroons
7%4 goals3%
KitaraMaroons

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal57%
KitaraMaroons
14%2 goals27%
KitaraMaroons
3%3 goals7%
KitaraMaroons
0%4 goals0%
KitaraMaroons

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
KitaraMaroons
3%BTTS in both halves3%
KitaraMaroons
21%Scored in both halves13%
KitaraMaroons

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
KitaraMaroons
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KitaraMaroons
60%BTTS - last 520%
KitaraMaroons

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
KitaraMaroons
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KitaraMaroons
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
KitaraMaroons

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
KitaraMaroons
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
KitaraMaroons
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KitaraMaroons

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Kitara · 1.2 pts / match - Maroons

Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing
Maroons - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.2
KitaraMaroons
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KitaraMaroons
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
KitaraMaroons
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.07
KitaraMaroons
76%Clean sheet before half-time60%
KitaraMaroons
38%No goal before half-time67%
KitaraMaroons

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.23
KitaraMaroons
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
KitaraMaroons
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KitaraMaroons
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.7
KitaraMaroons
62%Clean sheet after half-time70%
KitaraMaroons
66%No goal after half-time67%
KitaraMaroons

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Maroons - second-half results

20% W63% R17% P
36
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Maroons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Maroons
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Maroons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaMaroons
Average goals in match 2.102.09 1.77
Both teams scored 38%38% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%35% 33%
Clean sheets 45%39% 43%
Goal before half-time 76%59% 63%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 1 - 0 - 0 Maroons. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs Maroons?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 2:0 Maroons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Maroons?

Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and Maroons 0.87. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kitara's matches and 30% of Maroons's.

What form are Kitara and Maroons in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Maroons 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Maroons?

The statistical background for Kitara vs Maroons — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.