KMC vs Kitayosce: match statistics
KMC vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KMC played against Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on June 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
KMC has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Kitayosce has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KMC scores 0.57 goals per game and allows 1.70. Kitayosce scores 1.24 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.14 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of KMC's games and 36% of Kitayosce's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 44%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KMC has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.22 per game. KMC takes 6.7 shots per game, while Kitayosce takes 6.2.
First-half and second-half trends
KMC leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.30 goals per game after halftime. Kitayosce leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
KMC's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Kitayosce, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.14 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kitayosce have 10 wins and 31 goals this season, while KMC have only 2 wins and 13 goals, giving the visitors a clear advantage in goal output and results. KMC have lost 5 of their last 5 matches, conceding 12 goals in that period and collecting 0 points, whereas Kitayosce in their last 5 fixtures have scored 8 goals, conceded 6 and hold a 2-1-2 record with 1.4 points per game. Creativity metrics show the home team generate on average xG 1.46 and 3.5 shots on target per home match versus 0.93 xG and 1.88 shots on target for the visitors away, yet KMC convert that into just 0.5 goals per home game and fail to score in 60% of their appearances. Defensively the overall balance also favors the visitors — Kitayosce have conceded 24 goals this season versus 39 for KMC, and the average goals conceded in the last 5 matches is 12 for KMC vs 6 for the visitors, indicating greater susceptibility from the hosts. In light of these figures I assess the probabilities as: Kitayosce win ~65%, draw 20%, KMC win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics present a mixed picture: KMC at home scores 1.36 goals and concedes only 0.64 per match and has a 57% clean sheet rate, while seasonally both teams have BTTS at 36%. However, in the last 5 matches KMC conceded 12 goals (2.4 per match) and had 40% games with both teams scoring, and Kitayosce in the same period scored 8 goals (1.6 per match), conceded 6 (1.2 per match) and registered 80% BTTS. From a creation perspective guests’ xG is higher in the last 5 (1.64 vs 1.26 KMC), and KMC’s recent xG conceded is 1.89, suggesting the visitors are creating genuine chances against this defense. Although KMC at home averages 9.15 shots with 3.31 on target versus Kitayosce’s 4.88 and 1.88, the hosts’ recent form (5 straight defeats) and the high number of goals conceded increase the likelihood that both teams will score. Considering KMC’s 57% clean sheets this season versus the visitors’ 80% BTTS in the last 5, I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes at 65% over 35% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.32 expected goals for KMC and 1.10 for Kitayosce (total 2.42), based on average xG: KMC 1.39 and Kitayosce’s defense conceding 1.24 xG yields ~1.32, while Kitayosce’s 0.93 and KMC’s defense conceding 1.27 xG yields ~1.10. KMC averages 9.15 shots and 3.31 on target with a 14% conversion, whereas Kitayosce averages 4.88 shots and 1.88 on target with a 5% conversion, supporting the home side’s advantage in chance creation. Seasonally, Over1.5 rates are 64% for KMC and 73% for Kitayosce (average 68.5%); with expected 2.42 goals this provides a strong signal for Over1.5 — I rate it 70% vs 30% for Under1.5. I treat Over2.5 as nearly balanced at 48% Over vs 52% Under: seasonally KMC has Over2.5 in 36% of matches, Kitayosce 55%, league average Over2.5 is 39%, and the last 5 matches of both show Over2.5 in 60%, which partially increases Over chances but not enough to shift the edge. Over3.5 is unlikely (KMC 14% and Kitayosce 18% seasonally), so I assign Over3.5 16% vs Under 84%; my recommendation is the Over 1.5 bet (line 1.5) as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). KMC were level at the break in 64% of matches (9 times), whereas Kitayosce were level only in 30% and were trailing at half-time in 50%, which favors a draw in the first half. Over 90 minutes the edge goes to KMC: the hosts won 50% of fixtures versus 27% for the visitors, they have a higher xG (1.39 vs. 0.93) and more shots on target (3.31 vs. 1.88), and opponents concede on average 1.36 goals per game. However, KMC are in poor form (last 5 matches: 5 defeats), so I do not expect the hosts to be leading at the break (they led at half-time in only 21%, 3 times), which lowers the probability of 1/1 in favor of X/1. Additionally, the hosts kept a clean sheet in 57% of matches, which increases the realistic chance of a KMC turnaround in the second half and makes the visitors leading at the break unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KMC | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.57 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 118% better for: goals scored per game.
0.57 goals / game - KMC · 1.24 goals / game - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 77% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.7 goals / game - KMC · 0.96 goals / game - Kitayosce
KMC scores in 39% of games (9 of 23 meczów), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 meczów).
Kitayosce scores in 60% of games (15 of 25 meczów), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KMC
Over / Under - Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitayosce is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / game - KMC · 1.12 pts / game - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KMC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KMC
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| KMC | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.26 | 2.14 | • 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 36% | • 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 39% | 39% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 39% | • 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitayosceGoalChamou Karaboue
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KMC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kitayosce. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KMC vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Kitayosce?
KMC score 0.57 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.24. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 30% of KMC's matches and 36% of Kitayosce's.
What form are KMC and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Kitayosce 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Kitayosce?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KMC vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


