Kongsvinger vs Hødd: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Hødd: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kongsvinger played against Hødd in First Division (Norway). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Gjemselund Stadion. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Hødd has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Kongsvinger scores 2.86 goals per game and allows 1.55. Hødd scores 1.68 and allows 1.82. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 82% of Kongsvinger's games and 68% of Hødd's. The Over 2.5 rates are 82% and 68%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.25 per game. Kongsvinger takes 13.9 shots per game, while Hødd takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.73 goals per game after halftime. Hødd leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kongsvinger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (16 goals). For Hødd, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger sit 2nd and have won 14 of their 22 matches, while Hødd are fifth, with a record of 10 wins and 8 defeats. The hosts are particularly strong at home: they win 73% of their matches, score an average of 3.64 goals and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Hødd average just 1.45 goals away from home and draw a blank in 36% of their away fixtures. The quality of chances also favors Kongsvinger, whose home xG stands at 2.00 compared with the 1.10 generated by the visitors on the road. Kongsvinger are unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 29 goals and averaging 2.2 points per game, while Hødd have scored just 7 goals over the same period. The hosts’ defense is not flawless, conceding an average of 1.82 goals at home, but Hødd’s poor away finishing and 45% defeat rate on the road clearly point towards a Kongsvinger win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - Yes is clear, as Kongsvinger have seen both teams score in 73% of their matches, while the figure for Hødd is 64%, against a league average of 64%. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in as many as 80% of cases, while their defenses conceded an average of 1.6 and 1.8 goals respectively. Kongsvinger score 1.91 goals per home match, whereas Hødd average 1.45 goals, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 9% of their matches. Hødd have also recorded just 9% of matches without conceding and allow opponents an xG of 1.80, strongly supporting the likelihood of at least one home goal. Hødd's weaker recent xG of 0.96 limits confidence in the pick, but Kongsvinger's vulnerable defense and the high current BTTS frequency support the Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kongsvinger averages 1.91 goals at home, while Hødd concedes as many as 2.00 goals per away match, clearly favoring the hosts’ attacking output. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in just 9% of their matches, while at least 2 goals were scored in 91% of Kongsvinger’s games and 73% of Hødd’s. In their last five appearances, Kongsvinger averaged as many as 5.8 goals scored, while Hødd conceded 1.8; at the same time, both teams had 80% of matches in which both sides scored. The Over 2.5 goals line is also well supported, having landed in 73% of the hosts’ matches and 64% of the visitors’ games, with the league average standing at 3.82 goals. However, the safest pick remains Over 1.5 goals, as the defensive weaknesses of both teams significantly reduce the likelihood of a match finishing with no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kongsvinger have a clear advantage in the first halves: they have led at the break in 64% of matches, compared with just 18% for Hødd, while the visitors have gone into half-time trailing in as many as 36% of games. The hosts average 1.27 goals scored and 0.45 conceded before the break, whereas Hødd score just 0.36 goals during this period and concede 0.73. The current form further reinforces this trend: in their last five matches, Kongsvinger have averaged 2.2 goals scored before half-time, while Hødd have managed only 0.2 and failed to score in the first half in 80% of those games. The hosts’ advantage after the match is also justified, as they have won 64% of their league fixtures this season compared with Hødd’s 27%, while the visitors concede an average of 2.00 goals per match. Although the second half could be more open, Kongsvinger remain the most likely team to maintain or extend an early lead, making 1/1 the best-case scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Hødd | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 1.4 pts / game - Hødd
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 70% better for: goals scored per game.
2.86 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 1.68 goals / game - Hødd
Kongsvinger is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.55 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 1.82 goals / game - Hødd
Kongsvinger scores in 95% of games (21 of 22 games), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 games).
Hødd scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
Over / Under - Hødd
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Hødd - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kongsvinger
Hødd
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Hødd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.41 | 3.82 | ▼ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 82% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 72% | ▼ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 19% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 89% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kongsvinger's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Hødd. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Hødd?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 5:1 Hødd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Hødd?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 3, Hødd won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Hødd?
Kongsvinger score 2.86 goals per game on average and Hødd 1.68. The First Division average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 82% of Kongsvinger's matches and 68% of Hødd's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Hødd in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Hødd 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Hødd?
The statistical background for Kongsvinger vs Hødd — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


