Kongsvinger vs Raufoss: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Raufoss: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kongsvinger played against Raufoss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Gjemselund Stadion. Final score: 9:1.
Recent form
Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Raufoss has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kongsvinger scores 2.65 goals per game and allows 1.60. Raufoss scores 1.15 and allows 2.45. Games in this league average 3.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Kongsvinger's games and 60% of Raufoss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 75%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.24 per game. Kongsvinger takes 14.1 shots per game, while Raufoss takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.55 goals per game after halftime. Raufoss leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kongsvinger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). For Raufoss, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.87 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger sit 2nd, while Raufoss are 16th, and the gap is reflected in the results: the hosts have won 13 of 20 matches, while the visitors have lost 14. Kongsvinger are unbeaten in their last five games, recording 4 wins and a draw and scoring as many as 24 goals during that period, whereas Raufoss have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded 15 goals. At home, the hosts average 3.1 goals scored with an xG of 1.94, while Raufoss concede as many as 3.2 goals per away match and allow opponents an xG of 2.21. The visitors create significantly less threat, averaging 2.7 shots on target compared with Kongsvinger’s 6.2, and have also failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match. The hosts’ attacking superiority, 55% to 41% possession advantage, and Raufoss’ poor away defensive record all point decisively towards a Kongsvinger win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is primarily supported by Raufoss’s very weak defense, which concedes an average of 3.2 goals away from home and has kept no clean sheets. Kongsvinger are in excellent scoring form: they have averaged 4.8 goals in their last 5 matches, with an xG of 1.77, so they should consistently create chances against this defense. Raufoss do score only 1.0 goals per away game, but the hosts concede an average of 1.7 goals at home, while their average xG against stands at 1.57. BTTS has landed in 80% of Kongsvinger’s last five matches and 60% of Raufoss’s, compared with the league average of 63%. Additionally, Raufoss have scored 8 goals in their last 5 appearances, while Kongsvinger have conceded 9 during that period, further increasing the likelihood that the visitors will score at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kongsvinger are in excellent offensive form, averaging 4.8 goals scored across their last 5 matches, while Raufoss conceded 3.0 goals per game over the same period. The visitors’ season-long defensive record also looks weak, with an average of 3.2 goals conceded and 2.21 xG against, while the hosts create 1.38 xG on average. Recent results further support a high-scoring game: at least 3 goals were scored in 80% of Kongsvinger’s last five matches and in 100% of Raufoss’ games. However, the visitors should contribute to the total, as their xG over the last 5 matches stands at 1.54, compared with the 1.75 xG allowed by Kongsvinger. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest selection, as both teams recorded at least 2 total goals in 80% and 90% of their matches this season, respectively, while their current form clearly strengthens this signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kongsvinger are in significantly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 4.8 goals, while Raufoss have lost 4 of their last 5 and conceded an average of 3.0 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, while the visitors went into half-time trailing in as many as 60% of their matches over the same period. Kongsvinger’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.38 compared with 1.11, while Raufoss allow opponents an xG of as much as 2.21. After the break, the hosts have recently scored an average of 3.0 goals, whereas the visitors’ defense has conceded 3.2 goals per match over the course of the season. The most likely scenario is therefore a 1/1 HT/FT outcome, with Kongsvinger taking the lead at the break and holding on to it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Raufoss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 130% better for: goals scored per game.
2.65 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 1.15 goals / game - Raufoss
Kongsvinger is 53% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 2.45 goals / game - Raufoss
Kongsvinger scores in 95% of games (19 of 20 games), while Raufoss keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 games).
Raufoss scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
Over / Under - Raufoss
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 0.85 pts / game - Raufoss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Raufoss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kongsvinger
Raufoss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Raufoss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.25 | 3.87 | ▼ 3.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 74% | • 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 19% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 90% | 89% | • 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kongsvinger's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Raufoss. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Raufoss?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 9:1 Raufoss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Raufoss?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 1, Raufoss won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Raufoss?
Kongsvinger score 2.65 goals per game on average and Raufoss 1.15. The First Division average is 3.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Kongsvinger's matches and 60% of Raufoss's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Raufoss in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Raufoss 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Raufoss?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kongsvinger vs Raufoss: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.