KR vs Fram: match statistics
KR vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KR played against Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
KR has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Fram has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KR scores 4.17 goals per game and allows 1.83. Fram scores 3.00 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of KR's games and 83% of Fram's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 83%, compared with league averages of 73% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KR has the higher season xG average, 2.55 to 2.13 per game. KR takes 20.7 shots per game, while Fram takes 17.8.
First-half and second-half trends
KR leads at halftime in 83% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. Fram leads at halftime in 33% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
KR's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Fram, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.85 goals. Both teams score in 73% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KR holds a clear home advantage: 100% wins at their stadium (6-0-0), averaging 4.0 goals scored per match, 10.67 shots on target and 66% possession. Fram on the road averages 2.0 goals, only 5.0 shots on target and fails to score in 50% of away matches (FTS 50%), which materially reduces their realistic chances. KR also posts a higher shooting accuracy of 21% versus Fram’s 11%, with a similar volume of shots (19.33 vs 19), translating into 25 goals for KR compared to 18 for Fram. In xG terms the home side has 2.38 versus 2.2 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.02 vs 1.28, indicating KR creates better and safer chances; both teams average 2.4 points in their last 5 matches. Considering the perfect home record, significant edge in shots on target and conversion, I forecast a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - Yes comes from KR: they have a season BTTS rate of 100% and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Fram has 80% BTTS in the last 5 and 50% for the season, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. KR’s attack averages 3.5 goals per game (3.6 in the last 5) with xG 2.09, whereas Fram scores 2.0 goals on average (3.0 in the last 5) with xG 2.20 — both teams generate about 2.1 xG and have realistic scoring opportunities. At the same time, defenses rarely keep a clean sheet: KR concede 1.75 goals on average (1.8 in the last 5), and Fram 2.0 (1.6 in the last 5), and both teams have 0% season clean sheets. The league has a high BTTS share at 72% and an average of 4.0 goals per match, and KR have played 100% of matches with over 2.5 goals and 100% of matches with at least 3 goals and both teams scoring, which reinforces the expectation of goal exchange. Considering these numbers and KR’s superior finishing efficiency (conversion rate 20% versus Fram’s 11%), I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at about 85% versus 15% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KR at home averages 3.5 goals per match (25 goals this season), Fram scores 2.0 goals away (18 goals), and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season. xG shows 2.09 for KR and 2.20 for Fram, while defenses concede 1.33 and 1.28 xG respectively, translating to a forecast of 1.69 xG for the home side and 1.76 xG for the visitors, a total of 3.45 expected goals. Additionally, KR has a high conversion rate of 20% and averages 6.5 shots on target per match, which increases the likelihood of converting xG into actual goals. With λ=3.45 the Poisson distribution yields roughly an 86% probability for Over 1.5, ~67% for Over 2.5 and ~45% for Over 3.5; seasonal stats (league 4.0 goals/match, KR: 100% of matches over 2.5) confirm a propensity for high-scoring games. The strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (≈86%), therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the primary pick; Over 2.5 (67%) can be considered as a secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KR has a clear advantage: they average 3.5 goals per match versus Fram’s 2.0, win 75% of home games and have collected 8 points at half-time compared to Fram’s 1 point (averaging 2.0 pts vs 0.5 pts). At the break KR score on average 1.25 goals while Fram only 0.5, and the hosts led at the break in 2 of 4 matches (50%) whereas Fram did not lead at half-time in any (0%). Fram concedes on average 1.5 goals before the break, making them more susceptible to conceding in the first half. Although Fram’s xG is slightly higher (2.2 vs 2.09), KR have a markedly better conversion rate (shot efficiency 20% vs 11%) and more shots on target (6.5 vs 5.0), which translates into a higher actual goal return. Additionally KR scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 0 for Fram, suggesting that if KR holds a lead at half-time they have a strong chance to maintain and extend it — therefore the most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KR | Fram | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KR is 25% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - KR · 2.4 pts / game - Fram
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KR is 39% better for: goals scored per game.
4.17 goals / game - KR · 3 goals / game - Fram
KR scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
Fram scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while KR keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KR
Over / Under - Fram
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KR is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / game - KR · 1.5 pts / game - Fram
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KR - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 83% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fram - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KR
Fram
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| KR | Liga | Fram | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 6.00 | 3.85 | ▲ 4.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 15% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 90% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KR's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fram. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KR vs Fram?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished KR 2:2 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KR and Fram?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KR won 1, Fram won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KR vs Fram?
KR score 4.17 goals per game on average and Fram 3.00. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 100% of KR's matches and 83% of Fram's.
What form are KR and Fram in?
Over the last 5 games KR have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Fram 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KR vs Fram?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KR vs Fram: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.