KTP vs JäPS: match statistics
KTP vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KTP played against JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on September 11, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
KTP has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. JäPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KTP scores 1.73 goals per game and allows 0.95. JäPS scores 0.95 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of KTP's games and 27% of JäPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 45%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.26 per game. KTP takes 14.6 shots per game, while JäPS takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
KTP leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. JäPS leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For JäPS, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP sit top of the table and are in excellent form, having won all of their last 5 matches while scoring 8 goals and conceding just 2. At home, the hosts win 73% of their matches, averaging 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.83, whereas JäPS score only 1.00 goal per away game and fail to score in 36% of their away appearances. KTP also create significantly more danger, averaging 14.91 shots and 5.91 shots on target, compared with 10.73 and 3.45 for the visitors. JäPS’s defense concedes an average of 1.91 goals away from home, with an xG against of 1.72, and the team have lost 55% of such matches. The difference in current form, KTP’s superior chance quality and their highly solid home record all clearly point towards a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from KTP, whose matches have seen both teams score in only 9% of cases this season, while 64% of games ended with a clean sheet. The hosts are also in excellent defensive form: they have conceded just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while JäPS scores only 1.0 goal on average. JäPS has a weak defense, conceding 1.91 goals per match this season, which supports the likelihood of KTP scoring but does not, in itself, increase the chances of an away goal. Although the last five matches for both teams produced BTTS in 40% of cases, KTP’s season figure is clearly below the league average of 43%, making it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KTP are in excellent scoring form: they have scored 8 goals and conceded just 2 in their last five matches, averaging 1.6 and 0.4 goals per game, respectively. JäPS conceded 1.4 goals per game during this period and as many as 1.91 across the season, giving the hosts a solid projected total of around 1.48 goals. At the same time, KTP have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches this season, and only 9% of their games have produced more than 3.5 goals; for JäPS, this high-scoring outcome occurred in 36% of matches. The combined xG figures of 1.27 and 1.24 point to a game more likely to produce 2-3 goals than an open, high-scoring contest. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has a clear edge, as it only loses if there are at least four goals, while KTP’s defensive profile significantly reduces the likelihood of that scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KTP have been clearly superior recently, winning all of their last five matches while scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding just 0.4. The hosts held a lead at the break in 80% of those games, while JäPS were behind at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances. Across the season, KTP concede just 0.18 goals per match before the break and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 82% of their fixtures, while JäPS score only 0.36 goals during this period. The hosts’ advantage is also reflected in the full-match record: they have a 55% win rate compared with the visitors’ 36%, while JäPS concede an average of 1.91 goals per game. The most likely outcome is therefore KTP leading at half-time and securing the win after the final whistle, corresponding to the HT/FT 1/1 selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 114% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - KTP · 1.4 pts / game - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
1.73 goals / game - KTP · 0.95 goals / game - JäPS
KTP is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.95 goals / game - KTP · 1.41 goals / game - JäPS
KTP scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 games), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 games).
JäPS scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 games), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / game - KTP · 1.36 pts / game - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KTP
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.68 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 45% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 45% | • 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 32% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 64% | • 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 72% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KTP's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against JäPS. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 3:0 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and JäPS?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, JäPS won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs JäPS?
KTP score 1.73 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.95. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 45% of KTP's matches and 27% of JäPS's.
What form are KTP and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and JäPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs JäPS?
The statistical background for KTP vs JäPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.