KTP vs JIPPO: match statistics
KTP vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP play JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 3 July 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.79 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 43%, JIPPO 47%. Over 2.5: KTP 43%, JIPPO 40%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.67. KTP: 15.5 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.6.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14. JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
KTP is the favorite for this match: they sit 1st in the table with 9 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses this season, and win 80% of home matches. In their last 5 games KTP scored 10 goals and won 4 of 5 (avg. 2.0 goals and 2.4 points per game), while JIPPO has 1 win and 5 goals in five matches (1.0 goal and 1.0 point per game). KTP creates clearly more and better chances: their average home xG is 1.93 versus 1.47 xG for JIPPO away, and the hosts average 6.2 shots on target and 15.8 total shots per game, the visitors 4.2 on target and 12.2 total. In terms of efficiency JIPPO has a slightly higher conversion rate (13% vs 11%), but with fewer shots this yields fewer real goalscoring opportunities. Defensively both teams concede on average 0.8 goals per game in home/away conditions, however JIPPO has a higher average xG against (1.26 vs 1.07), suggesting KTP is slightly more secure at the back. Given the hosts' dominance in chance creation and form, I predict a KTP win: 65% chance for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for a JIPPO victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JIPPO is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - KTP · 2.2 pts / match - JIPPO
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - KTP · 1.47 goals / match - JIPPO
JIPPO is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - KTP · 0.73 goals / match - JIPPO
KTP scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — KTP
Over / Under — JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - KTP · 1.47 pts / match - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.79 | 2.51 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 61% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KTP 0 - 1 - 0 JIPPO. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 3:3 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs JIPPO?
KTP score 1.79 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of KTP's matches and 47% of JIPPO's.
What form are KTP and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs JIPPO?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.