KTP vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
KTP vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KTP played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 31, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KTP has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
KTP scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.13. SJK Akatemia scores 0.44 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of KTP's games and 25% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 19%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.22 per game. KTP takes 15.2 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 9.6.
First-half and second-half trends
KTP leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP is the clear favorite in this matchup: the hosts sit 2nd in the table with 10 wins this season, while SJK Akatemia has only 1 win and is 10th. The gap in attack is significant – KTP have scored 28 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 matches (an average of 2.4 goals in those games), whereas SJK have 7 goals this season and just 3 in the last 5 (0.6 on average). Chance quality also favors the hosts: KTP record 15 shots and 5.75 on target per home match with a conversion rate around 13% and xG 1.85, while SJK average 9.88 shots and 2.63 on target away with a 6% conversion and xG 1.25. Defensively KTP’s advantage is clear as well – the hosts concede 1.13 goals on average at home and keep clean sheets in 25% of home games, while SJK concede 1.63 goals away, have 0% clean sheets and fail to score in 63% of away matches. Considering recent form (KTP 1.6 points in the last 5 vs 0.6 for SJK) and the superiority in shots, xG and efficiency, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
SJK Akatemia has severe offensive issues: they have scored only 7 goals all season (0.63 per match) and netted 3 goals in the last 5 games (0.6 per match), which greatly reduces the likelihood of the away side scoring. KTP at home have scored 28 goals this season and average 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches, and additionally have kept a clean sheet in 38% of home games, indicating hosts frequently finish matches with a clean sheet. Season BTTS rates are only 13% for KTP at home and 38% for SJK away, both below the league average of 45%, implying a lower probability of both teams scoring than the league norm. Although xG indicates both teams create similar chances (xG ~1.22 for KTP and 1.25 for SJK), SJK fail to convert (xG 1.25 vs actual 0.63), and their poor finishing is the decisive factor. Based on these figures (28 vs 7 goals scored, 38% home clean sheets and low BTTS for KTP at 13%), I recommend the
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects total expected goals of 2.97 (KTP 1.44, SJK Akatemia 1.53), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.22 and away defense xG 1.65, and away attack xG 1.25 and home defense xG 1.82. In the last 5 matches KTP scored 12 goals (2.4 per match) with average xG 1.59, while SJK scored 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 per match) with average xG 1.58; hosts average 9.5 shots with 3.25 on target, visitors 9.88 with 2.63 on target. Season indicators are mixed: SJK have 63% of matches over 1.5 goals versus KTP 38%, but KTP had 60% of their last 5 matches over 2.5 goals, which favors a higher-scoring game scenario. Given the expected 2.97 goals, KTP’s offensive activity and similar recent xG for both teams, the strongest signal is over 1.5 (high probability), over 2.5 is moderately likely (~65%), and over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%). Therefore I recommend the over side on the 1.5 line as the primary pick, with a value bet option on Over 2.5 if the odds are attractive.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a KTP victory after 90 minutes (X/1): the home side were level at the break in 63% of their matches, while the visitors virtually never led at half-time (0% leads at the break). Despite a similar xG (1.22 for KTP versus 1.25 for SJK Akatemia), the better form of the hosts favors them — in the last 5 matches KTP won 40% of games, while SJK Akatemia won 0%, and the average goals scored in the last 5 matches are 2.4 for the hosts versus 0.6 for the visitors. The hosts also average 1.0 points at half-time compared to 0.5 for the visitors, and 75% of the hosts’ matches were goalless conceded by half-time (clean sheet at the break 75%), which supports 0:0/1:0 half-time scores and a subsequent home victory. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the X/1 combination (36%), a significant chance of a full-time draw (X/X 18%), and lower probabilities for 1/1 (12%) and for a visitors’ win after 90 minutes (2/2 1%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - KTP · 0.6 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 298% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - KTP · 0.44 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
KTP is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - KTP · 1.25 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
KTP scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 games).
SJK Akatemia scores in 31% of games (5 of 16 games), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - KTP · 0.75 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 6%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KTP
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.88 | 2.48 | ▼ 1.69 |
| Both teams scored | • 44% | 45% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 44% | 44% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 31% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 61% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KTP's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against SJK Akatemia. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 2:1 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
KTP score 1.75 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.44. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of KTP's matches and 25% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are KTP and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


