Malaysia - Super LeagueData current as of September 08, 2026

Kuching FA vs PDRM: match statistics

Kuching FA crest
Kuching FA
4 : 1half-time 1:1
PDRM crest
PDRM

Kuching FA vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kuching FA played against PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Recent form

Kuching FA has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. PDRM has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Kuching FA scores 1.74 goals per game and allows 0.47. PDRM scores 0.74 and allows 3.05. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 26% of Kuching FA's games and 47% of PDRM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 74%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kuching FA has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 0.93 per game. Kuching FA takes 13.6 shots per game, while PDRM takes 6.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Kuching FA leads at halftime in 58% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. PDRM leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.42 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kuching FA's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For PDRM, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kuching FA are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 4th in the table, win 78% of home matches and have a season record of 33 goals scored/9 conceded, while PDRM are 13th with just 14 scored and 58 conceded. At home Kuching average 2.11 goals scored and concede only 0.22 per match, whereas PDRM on the road average 0.56 goals scored and concede 3.11, yielding a decisive advantage in both offense and defense. The quality-of-chances differential is confirmed by the numbers: Kuching average 15.56 shots and 5.22 on target at home with xG 1.75, while PDRM away average 5.78 shots and 2.11 on target with xG 0.74; additionally PDRM fail to score in 56% of away matches versus 11% for Kuching. Form trends also favor the hosts — Kuching have scored 5 and conceded 2 in their last 5 (averaging 2 points/match), whereas PDRM in the same sample have scored 3 and conceded 16 (0.8 points/match); therefore I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators are mixed: Kuching have BTTS in 60% of matches, PDRM only 33%, with the league average at 46%. In the last 5 matches Kuching scored 5 goals (1.0 per match) and conceded 2 (0.4 per match), while PDRM scored 3 (0.6 per match) and conceded as many as 16 (3.2 per match), suggesting the home side are likely to score and the visitors are struggling for efficiency. xG analysis confirms Kuching's superiority: home xG_for 1.11 versus away xG_against 2.49 indicates many created chances, whereas PDRM have xG_for 0.74 against Kuching's xG_against 2.05, reducing the probability of an away goal. Although seasonal clean sheet percentages are low (10% and 11%), Kuching's recent defensive form (0.4 conceded per match in the last 5) is a strong signal that PDRM may fail to respond with a goal. On this basis I tip BTTS — No as more likely: 65% vs 35% for Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals: I calculate 1.80 for Kuching and 1.40 for PDRM (total 3.20), using the average of the team’s xG_for and the opponent’s xG_against as the base ((1.11+2.49)/2=1.80 and (0.74+2.05)/2=1.40). Seasonal metrics show both teams frequently play high-scoring games: Kuching has 70% of matches Over 2.5 and 80% Over 1.5, PDRM has 78% and 89% respectively, and Over 0.5 occurs in 90% and 100% of their matches. Additionally, PDRM conceded 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match), while Kuching scored 5 and conceded 2 in their last 5, indicating greater goal risk from the away side alongside home productivity. A Poisson model for total xG=3.20 yields roughly an 83% chance of Over 1.5, 62% for Over 2.5 and 41% for Over 3.5; however, seasonal Over 2.5 rates of 70–78% push my probability for Over 2.5 higher. As a result I recommend backing the Over on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal (I estimate Over 2.5 at 72% chance), while Over 1.5 also looks strong (86%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates an advantage for Kuching FA: their xG is 1.11 versus PDRM's 0.74, average shots 7.9 versus 5.78 and 3.2 shots on target versus 2.11, demonstrating greater home pressure. In the last five matches Kuching led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 0.8 goals before half-time, while PDRM conceded an average of 1.75 goals before the break in those five games, increasing the likelihood of a home goal at half-time. The visitors concede on average 3.11 goals per game season-to-date and 2.33 after the break, and their form 'ldwll' with only a 20% win rate in the last five matches reduces the chances of a meaningful turnaround in the second half. Therefore the most likely scenario is Kuching leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) — I assign this 40%, with alternatives X/1 18% and 2/1 11% as secondary scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Kuching FAPDRM
16Shots5
Kuching FAPDRM
7Shots on target3
Kuching FAPDRM
1.93xG0.67
Kuching FAPDRM
7Corners0
Kuching FAPDRM
61Dangerous attacks19
Kuching FAPDRM
9Fouls8
Kuching FAPDRM
2Cards1
Kuching FAPDRM

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.74Goals scored / game0.74
Kuching FAPDRM
0.47Goals allowed / game3.05
Kuching FAPDRM
54%Average possession44%
Kuching FAPDRM
4.79Shots on target / game2.68
Kuching FAPDRM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.63Shots per game6.84
Kuching FAPDRM
4.79Shots on target2.68
Kuching FAPDRM
12.7%Shot conversion10.8%
Kuching FAPDRM
54%Possession44%
Kuching FAPDRM
1.59xG for0.93
Kuching FAPDRM
1.23xG against2.28
Kuching FAPDRM

Shooting quality

Kuching FA: BalancedPDRM: Balanced
Kuching FAPDRM
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kuching FA is 200% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Kuching FA · 0.8 pts / game - PDRM

Kuching FA
WLWWW
Season result split
63% W21% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-3
2.11 pts / game · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
PDRM
LDWLL
Season result split
11% W21% R68% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-13
0.53 pts / game · goal difference -44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 0.52Opponent xG: 3.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kuching FA is 135% better for: goals scored per game.

1.74 goals / game - Kuching FA · 0.74 goals / game - PDRM

Kuching FA is 549% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.47 goals / game - Kuching FA · 3.05 goals / game - PDRM

Kuching FA scoring profile: very strong

Kuching FA scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).

PDRM scoring profile: more difficult

PDRM scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while Kuching FA keeps a clean sheet in 63% (12 of 19 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)14
Kuching FAPDRM
9Goals conceded (season)58
Kuching FAPDRM
2.21Average goals per game3.79
Kuching FAPDRM
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Kuching FAPDRM
1Goals conceded (last 5)17
Kuching FAPDRM

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal53%
Kuching FAPDRM
37%2 goals16%
Kuching FAPDRM
21%3 goals5%
Kuching FAPDRM
21%4 goals0%
Kuching FAPDRM

How often they concede at least...

37%1 goal89%
Kuching FAPDRM
11%2 goals74%
Kuching FAPDRM
0%3 goals58%
Kuching FAPDRM
0%4 goals32%
Kuching FAPDRM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Kuching FAPDRM
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kuching FAPDRM
32%Scored in both halves11%
Kuching FAPDRM

BTTS and goal count

11%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Kuching FAPDRM
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
Kuching FAPDRM
0%BTTS - last 540%
Kuching FAPDRM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Kuching FAPDRM
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Kuching FAPDRM
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Kuching FAPDRM

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Kuching FAPDRM
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
Kuching FAPDRM
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time53%
Kuching FAPDRM

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kuching FA is 143% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.16 pts / game - Kuching FA · 0.89 pts / game - PDRM

Kuching FA - half-time state
58% leading42% draw0% trailing
PDRM - half-time state
21% leading26% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.16Points per game (1st half)0.89
Kuching FAPDRM
1Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Kuching FAPDRM
0.11Goals conceded (1st half)1.11
Kuching FAPDRM
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.42
Kuching FAPDRM
89%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Kuching FAPDRM
32%No goal before half-time74%
Kuching FAPDRM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per game (2nd half)0.42
Kuching FAPDRM
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Kuching FAPDRM
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)1.95
Kuching FAPDRM
1.11Average goals (2nd half)2.37
Kuching FAPDRM
74%Clean sheet after half-time21%
Kuching FAPDRM
47%No goal after half-time63%
Kuching FAPDRM

Kuching FA - second-half results

47% W26% R26% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PDRM - second-half results

11% W11% R79% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-29
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kuching FA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game0.80.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
PDRM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.20
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game1.22.2
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-3-11
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kuching FA
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
0
16-30
8
1
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

PDRM
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
8
16-30
1
8
31-45
3
14
46-60
3
8
61-75
2
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.4 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kuching FA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

PDRM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

Kuching FALigaPDRM
Average goals per game 2.213.19 3.79
Both teams scored 26%47% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%58% 74%
Clean sheets 63%29% 11%
Goal before half-time 68%78% 74%
Goal after half-time 74%81% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / game
1.47
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kuching FAGoalRonald Ngah
  2. Kuching FAYellow cardAhmad Nawaf Abdel Aziz Israiwah
  3. Kuching FAGoalJerome Mpasko Etame
  4. PDRMSubstitutionOn: Zazrir NaimOff: Fakhrul Azim
  5. Kuching FAYellow cardGabriel Nistelrooy Tamin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kuching FA's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against PDRM. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

PDRM
0 : 5
Kuching FA

FAQ

What was the result of Kuching FA vs PDRM?

The Super League match finished Kuching FA 4:1 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kuching FA vs PDRM?

Kuching FA score 1.74 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.74. The Super League average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Kuching FA's matches and 47% of PDRM's.

What form are Kuching FA and PDRM in?

Over the last 5 games Kuching FA have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and PDRM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kuching FA vs PDRM?

The statistical background for Kuching FA vs PDRM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.