Kuching FA vs PDRM: match statistics
Kuching FA vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kuching FA play PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Kuching FA: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. PDRM: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kuching FA scores 1.88 and concedes 0.58 goals per match. PDRM scores 0.71 and concedes 3.29. League average: 3.29 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kuching FA 38%, PDRM 50%. Over 2.5: Kuching FA 42%, PDRM 75%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Kuching FA has higher xG: 1.66 vs 0.90. Kuching FA: 14.1 shots per match, PDRM: 6.3.
Match halves
Kuching FA: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.92. PDRM: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Kuching FA: 61-75 (12 goals). PDRM: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Kuching FA are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 4th in the table, win 78% of home matches and have a season record of 33 goals scored/9 conceded, while PDRM are 13th with just 14 scored and 58 conceded. At home Kuching average 2.11 goals scored and concede only 0.22 per match, whereas PDRM on the road average 0.56 goals scored and concede 3.11, yielding a decisive advantage in both offense and defense. The quality-of-chances differential is confirmed by the numbers: Kuching average 15.56 shots and 5.22 on target at home with xG 1.75, while PDRM away average 5.78 shots and 2.11 on target with xG 0.74; additionally PDRM fail to score in 56% of away matches versus 11% for Kuching. Form trends also favor the hosts — Kuching have scored 5 and conceded 2 in their last 5 (averaging 2 points/match), whereas PDRM in the same sample have scored 3 and conceded 16 (0.8 points/match); therefore I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kuching FA | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kuching FA is 1200% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Kuching FA · 0.2 pts / match - PDRM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kuching FA is 165% better for: goals scored per match.
1.88 goals / match - Kuching FA · 0.71 goals / match - PDRM
Kuching FA is 467% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.58 goals / match - Kuching FA · 3.29 goals / match - PDRM
Kuching FA scores in 92% of matches (22 of 24 matches), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).
PDRM scores in 54% of matches (13 of 24 matches), while Kuching FA keeps a clean sheet in 54% (13 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kuching FA
Over / Under — PDRM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kuching FA is 153% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Kuching FA · 0.79 pts / match - PDRM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kuching FA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
PDRM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -10 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kuching FA
PDRM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Kuching FA | Liga | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.46 | 3.29 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 28% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | • 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kuching FA 1 - 0 - 0 PDRM. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kuching FA vs PDRM?
The Super League match finished Kuching FA 4:1 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kuching FA vs PDRM?
Kuching FA score 1.88 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.71. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kuching FA's matches and 50% of PDRM's.
What form are Kuching FA and PDRM in?
Over the last 5 games Kuching FA have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and PDRM 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kuching FA vs PDRM?
The statistical background for Kuching FA vs PDRM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.