Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers: match statistics
Kun Khalifat is in last, 20th place in the table and is going through a very poor run – in their last five matches, they have recorded four defeats and one draw, scoring only one goal. Despite the difficult situation, the hosts show better efficiency at home than Enugu Rangers do away – on average, they score 1 goal per match at home, while the visitors score only 0.56 goals away. Enugu Rangers have not won any away match this season (0% win rate), losing 67% of their games, which makes them a very weak team on the road. Although the visitors' form over the last five matches overall is better (1.6 points per game), their hopeless away record speaks in favor of the hosts. I predict a narrow victory for Kun Khalifat or a draw, with a slight edge for the home team due to the home advantage and their desperate need for points in the relegation battle.
Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kun Khalifat played against Enugu Rangers in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Kun Khalifat has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Enugu Rangers has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Kun Khalifat scores 0.80 goals per game and allows 1.20. Enugu Rangers scores 0.95 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 1.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Kun Khalifat's games and 30% of Enugu Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 25%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Enugu Rangers has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.09 per game. Kun Khalifat takes 5.1 shots per game, while Enugu Rangers takes 5.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Kun Khalifat leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Enugu Rangers leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kun Khalifat's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Enugu Rangers, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.84 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kun Khalifat is in last, 20th place in the table and is going through a very poor run – in their last five matches, they have recorded four defeats and one draw, scoring only one goal. Despite the difficult situation, the hosts show better efficiency at home than Enugu Rangers do away – on average, they score 1 goal per match at home, while the visitors score only 0.56 goals away. Enugu Rangers have not won any away match this season (0% win rate), losing 67% of their games, which makes them a very weak team on the road. Although the visitors' form over the last five matches overall is better (1.6 points per game), their hopeless away record speaks in favor of the hosts. I predict a narrow victory for Kun Khalifat or a draw, with a slight edge for the home team due to the home advantage and their desperate need for points in the relegation battle.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kun Khalifat | Enugu Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.59 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Enugu Rangers is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Kun Khalifat · 1.6 pts / game - Enugu Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Enugu Rangers is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
0.8 goals / game - Kun Khalifat · 0.95 goals / game - Enugu Rangers
Enugu Rangers is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - Kun Khalifat · 0.75 goals / game - Enugu Rangers
Kun Khalifat scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 games), while Enugu Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 games).
Enugu Rangers scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 games), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kun Khalifat
Over / Under - Enugu Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Enugu Rangers is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Kun Khalifat · 1.45 pts / game - Enugu Rangers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kun Khalifat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Enugu Rangers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kun Khalifat
Enugu Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Kun Khalifat | Liga | Enugu Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.00 | 1.84 | ▼ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 36% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 30% | 27% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 62% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Kun Khalifat's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Enugu Rangers. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers?
The NPFL match finished Kun Khalifat 1:2 Enugu Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers?
Kun Khalifat score 0.80 goals per game on average and Enugu Rangers 0.95. The NPFL average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kun Khalifat's matches and 30% of Enugu Rangers's.
What form are Kun Khalifat and Enugu Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Kun Khalifat have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Enugu Rangers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers?
The statistical background for Kun Khalifat vs Enugu Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.