Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueStadion KarasayData current as of 16 July 2026

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Yelimay Semey: match statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Yelimay Semey crest
Yelimay Semey

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Yelimay Semey: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyzyl-Zhar play Yelimay Semey in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Yelimay Semey: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Yelimay Semey scores 1.50 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 41%, Yelimay Semey 63%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 53%, Yelimay Semey 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Yelimay Semey has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.13. Kyzyl-Zhar: 9.5 shots per match, Yelimay Semey: 14.5.

Match halves

Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Yelimay Semey: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (6 goals). Yelimay Semey: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I forecast a Yelimay Semey victory: the visitors sit 5th with a 6-5-4 record and 23 goals scored, while Kyzyl-Zhar are 13th (4-3-9) with 17 goals. In their last 5 matches Yelimay scored 9 goals and won 3/5, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Kyzyl-Zhar have only 5 goals and 1 win in their last 5, averaging 0.6 pts per game. Defensively the hosts look weaker — they conceded 13 goals in the last 5 (2.6 per game) vs. the visitors’ 8 (1.6); at home Kyzyl-Zhar concede 1.75 goals per game compared to Yelimay’s 1.29 conceded away. The visitors also generate better chances: average xG for Yelimay is 1.61 vs. 1.27 for the hosts, and shot volume/accuracy is 13.29 and 5.57 on target for the visitors vs. 10.13 and 4.75 for the hosts, indicating superiority in both quality and quantity of opportunities. Although the hosts have higher shot conversion (19% vs. 14%) and typically score 1.88 goals at home versus the visitors’ 1.86 away, the form balance, superior xG and the visitors’ more robust defense favor a Yelimay win; I propose probability distribution 20% home, 20% draw, 60% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
10Shots18
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
3Shots on target6
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.23xG1.88
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
6Corners12
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
54Dangerous attacks46
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
13Fouls16
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
5Cards4
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1Goals scored / match1.5
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.47Goals conceded / match1.19
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
45%Average possession50%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
3.65Shots on target / match5.31
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.47Shots per match14.5
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
3.65Shots on target5.31
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
10.6%Shot conversion10.3%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
45%Possession50%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.13xG for1.67
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.51xG against1.24
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Shooting quality

Kyzyl-Zhar: BalancedYelimay Semey: Attacking
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kyzyl-Zhar
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W18% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-10
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Yelimay Semey
WLLWW
Season result split
44% W31% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-4
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yelimay Semey is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.5 goals / match - Yelimay Semey

Yelimay Semey is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.19 goals / match - Yelimay Semey

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while Yelimay Semey keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Yelimay Semey scoring profile: very strong

Yelimay Semey scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)24
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
25Goals conceded (season)19
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
2.47Average goals in match2.69
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
2Goals scored (last 5)8
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal88%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
29%2 goals44%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
12%3 goals13%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
6%4 goals6%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal75%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
53%2 goals38%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
12%3 goals6%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
6%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time19%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
12%Scored in both halves19%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
20%BTTS - last 560%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

35%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
6%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yelimay Semey is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.31 pts / match - Yelimay Semey

Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
12% leading71% draw18% trailing
Yelimay Semey - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.31
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
0.53Average goals (1st half)1
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
76%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
82%No goal before half-time56%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)1
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
35%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey
53%No goal after half-time38%
Kyzyl-ZharYelimay Semey

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
18
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Yelimay Semey - second-half results

44% W19% R38% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Yelimay Semey - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Yelimay Semey
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Yelimay Semey

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kyzyl-ZharLigaYelimay Semey
Average goals in match 2.472.26 2.69
Both teams scored 41%50% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%42% 50%
Clean sheets 24%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 35%61% 69%
Goal after half-time 82%69% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
0.93
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Kyzyl-Zhar 0 - 1 - 2 Yelimay Semey. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FK Yelimay Semey
2 : 0
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Yelimay Semey
2 : 0
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
1 : 1
FK Yelimay Semey

FAQ

What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Yelimay Semey?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 0:1 Yelimay Semey. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Yelimay Semey?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 0, Yelimay Semey won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Yelimay Semey?

Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Yelimay Semey 1.50. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 63% of Yelimay Semey's.

What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Yelimay Semey in?

Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Yelimay Semey 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Yelimay Semey?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.