Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData current as of 23 July 2026

Larne vs Cliftonville: match statistics

Larne crest
Larne
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
165%(1.44)
X22%(4.00)
213%(6.00)

Larne are the clear favorites for this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 22 wins this season. The hosts boast excellent home form with 65% wins at home and only 6% losses, confirmed by a run of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. Cliftonville have been considerably weaker on the road, winning only 31% of matches with 44% losses and a negative goal difference (-4). Larne also dominate in offensive aspects, scoring an average of 1.88 goals per home game while conceding only 0.59, whereas Cliftonville concede an average of 1.44 goals away. The advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), shot accuracy, and clean sheets in 59% of home games further support a confident home win. The recent form of both teams (Larne: 2.2 pts/game vs Cliftonville: 1.4 pts/game) confirms the clear advantage of the league leaders.

Larne vs Cliftonville: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Larne play Cliftonville in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Larne: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cliftonville: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Larne scores 1.92 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Cliftonville scores 1.44 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Larne 39%, Cliftonville 59%. Over 2.5: Larne 47%, Cliftonville 59%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Larne has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.41. Larne: 12.4 shots per match, Cliftonville: 11.8.

Match halves

Larne: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.05. Cliftonville: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Larne: 76-90+ (20 goals). Cliftonville: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NIFL Premiership: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Larne are the clear favorites for this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 22 wins this season. The hosts boast excellent home form with 65% wins at home and only 6% losses, confirmed by a run of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. Cliftonville have been considerably weaker on the road, winning only 31% of matches with 44% losses and a negative goal difference (-4). Larne also dominate in offensive aspects, scoring an average of 1.88 goals per home game while conceding only 0.59, whereas Cliftonville concede an average of 1.44 goals away. The advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), shot accuracy, and clean sheets in 59% of home games further support a confident home win. The recent form of both teams (Larne: 2.2 pts/game vs Cliftonville: 1.4 pts/game) confirms the clear advantage of the league leaders.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
LarneCliftonville
8Shots12
LarneCliftonville
4Shots on target2
LarneCliftonville
1.15xG1.22
LarneCliftonville
7Corners2
LarneCliftonville
50Dangerous attacks45
LarneCliftonville
10Fouls10
LarneCliftonville
0Cards0
LarneCliftonville

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.92Goals scored / match1.44
LarneCliftonville
0.68Goals conceded / match1.56
LarneCliftonville
52%Average possession52%
LarneCliftonville
5.13Shots on target / match4.28
LarneCliftonville

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.39Shots per match11.77
LarneCliftonville
5.13Shots on target4.28
LarneCliftonville
15.5%Shot conversion12.2%
LarneCliftonville
52%Possession52%
LarneCliftonville
1.56xG for1.41
LarneCliftonville
1.1xG against1.46
LarneCliftonville

Shooting quality

Larne: Efficient finishingCliftonville: Balanced
LarneCliftonville
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Larne is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Larne · 1.2 pts / match - Cliftonville

Larne
WLWDW
Season result split
66% W21% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
25-8-5
2.18 pts / match · goal difference +47
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Cliftonville
LLWWL
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-16
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Larne is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Larne · 1.44 goals / match - Cliftonville

Larne is 129% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Larne · 1.56 goals / match - Cliftonville

Larne scoring profile: very strong

Larne scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).

Cliftonville scoring profile: mixed

Cliftonville scores in 77% of matches (30 of 39 matches), while Larne keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

73Goals scored (season)56
LarneCliftonville
26Goals conceded (season)61
LarneCliftonville
2.61Average goals in match3
LarneCliftonville
13Goals scored (last 5)7
LarneCliftonville
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
LarneCliftonville

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal77%
LarneCliftonville
63%2 goals41%
LarneCliftonville
21%3 goals15%
LarneCliftonville
13%4 goals5%
LarneCliftonville

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal74%
LarneCliftonville
16%2 goals54%
LarneCliftonville
5%3 goals15%
LarneCliftonville
3%4 goals8%
LarneCliftonville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time26%
LarneCliftonville
5%BTTS in both halves8%
LarneCliftonville
29%Scored in both halves21%
LarneCliftonville

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
LarneCliftonville
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
LarneCliftonville
20%BTTS - last 580%
LarneCliftonville

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
LarneCliftonville
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
LarneCliftonville
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
LarneCliftonville

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
LarneCliftonville
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time49%
LarneCliftonville
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
LarneCliftonville

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Larne is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.82 pts / match - Larne · 1.23 pts / match - Cliftonville

Larne - half-time state
47% leading39% draw13% trailing
Cliftonville - half-time state
28% leading38% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)1.23
LarneCliftonville
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.64
LarneCliftonville
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
LarneCliftonville
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.41
LarneCliftonville
74%Clean sheet before half-time46%
LarneCliftonville
42%No goal before half-time54%
LarneCliftonville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)1.38
LarneCliftonville
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
LarneCliftonville
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
LarneCliftonville
1.37Average goals (2nd half)1.59
LarneCliftonville
74%Clean sheet after half-time46%
LarneCliftonville
45%No goal after half-time49%
LarneCliftonville

Larne - second-half results

53% W29% R18% P
69
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
71
Second-half points
+28
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cliftonville - second-half results

36% W31% R33% P
48
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Larne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Cliftonville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Larne
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
12
5
16-30
12
7
31-45
12
7
46-60
8
1
61-75
20
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
7
11
16-30
9
16
31-45
10
8
46-60
7
13
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Larne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
51%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

LarneLigaCliftonville
Average goals in match 2.612.94 3.00
Both teams scored 39%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%56% 59%
Clean sheets 55%26% 26%
Goal before half-time 68%76% 74%
Goal after half-time 74%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Larne 1 - 2 - 0 Cliftonville. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Larne FC
0 : 0
Cliftonville FC
Cliftonville FC
0 : 2
Larne FC
Cliftonville FC
1 : 1
Larne FC

FAQ

What was the result of Larne vs Cliftonville?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Larne 2:0 Cliftonville. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Larne and Cliftonville?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Larne won 1, Cliftonville won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Larne vs Cliftonville?

Larne score 1.92 goals per game on average and Cliftonville 1.44. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Larne's matches and 59% of Cliftonville's.

What form are Larne and Cliftonville in?

Over the last 5 games Larne have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cliftonville 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Larne vs Cliftonville?

The statistical background for Larne vs Cliftonville — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.