Le Mans vs Clermont: match statistics
Le Mans vs Clermont: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Le Mans played against Clermont in Ligue 2 (France). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Le Mans has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Clermont has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Le Mans scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 0.97. Clermont scores 1.13 and allows 1.37. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Le Mans's games and 60% of Clermont's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Le Mans has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.16 per game. Le Mans takes 11.2 shots per game, while Clermont takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Le Mans leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Clermont leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Le Mans's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Clermont, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 2 games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Le Mans is the favorite in this match: they sit 3rd in the table, win 53% of home games, concede only 0.47 goals per game at home and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches. The hosts are in very good form — in the last 5 matches they recorded 4 wins and 1 draw, scoring 15 goals (3.0 per game) and collecting 13 points from five fixtures. Clermont are 14th, have only a 20% win rate away, haven’t won in their last 5 (0-2-3), scored 5 goals (1.0 per game) and gathered just 2 points, and concede on average 1.6 goals away. At home Le Mans averages 12.07 shots and 4.2 shots on target with an xG of 1.41, while Clermont on the road average 9.73 shots, 2.93 on target and xG 1.03, which indicates more chances and higher expected opportunities for the hosts. Considering the superior defense (0.47 vs 1.6 goals conceded), the xG advantage (1.41 vs 1.03) and form (13 vs 2 points from the last 5), I back a Le Mans win; a draw or Clermont victory are considerably less likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators strongly favor the “Yes” option: Le Mans have 67% of matches with both teams scoring, Clermont 53%, versus a league average of 51%. Goal stats show Le Mans score 1.13 and concede 1.13 per game, while Clermont score 1.13 and concede 1.6, meaning Clermont concedes more (1.6). xG and form confirm home pressure — Le Mans xG_for 1.30 vs Clermont xG_for 1.03, and in the last 5 matches Le Mans have xG_for 1.69 and average 3.0 goals scored vs Clermont 1.23 xG and 1.0 goals. Additionally Le Mans generate 11.47 shots with 3.87 on target compared to Clermont’s 9.73 and 2.93, and Le Mans have only 7% clean sheets vs Clermont 27%, all increasing the likelihood of both teams finding the net (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals by averaging the offense xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Le Mans has xG 1.30 versus Clermont’s xG against 1.55, yielding an expected 1.43 goals for the home side; Clermont has xG 1.03 versus xG against Le Mans 1.26, yielding 1.15 goals for the visitors, for a total of 2.58 goals. Seasonal rates show Le Mans has 67% of matches over 1.5 goals and Clermont 60%, while for the 2.5 line the figures are close (47%/53%), suggesting a moderate chance for Over 2.5. Le Mans scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game) with last-5 xG of 1.69, whereas Clermont scored 5 (1.0 per game) with xG 1.23 and conceded 8 (1.6) in the last 5, which increases the probability of a higher goals tally. The difference in shots on target (3.87 vs 2.93) and the high share of matches with goals (Le Mans 67%, Clermont 53%) point to a strong likelihood of at least 2 goals. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (~73% chance), while the 2.5 line remains more balanced (~48% Over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Le Mans appears to be the favorite: in the last 5 matches they have won 4 times (80%), while Clermont have not won any (0%) and lost 3 of 5 (60%). Le Mans led at the break in 3 of the last 5 fixtures (60%), and the average first-half goals in those matches is 1.6 for Le Mans versus 0.2 for Clermont, which suggests a home advantage already after 45 minutes. Quality-of-chance metrics confirm Le Mans’ edge: xG 1.30 versus 1.03 for Clermont, on average 3.87 shots on target versus 2.93 and fewer xG conceded (1.26 vs 1.55), favoring the maintenance of a lead. Le Mans have averaged 3.0 goals per match in the last 5, versus Clermont’s 1.0, so I assign the highest probability to the scenario of leading at half-time and winning the match for the home side (1/1 — 36%), with additional signals for X/1 (16%) and X/X (16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Le Mans | Clermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Le Mans is 550% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Le Mans · 0.4 pts / game - Clermont
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Le Mans is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Le Mans · 1.13 goals / game - Clermont
Le Mans is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.97 goals / game - Le Mans · 1.37 goals / game - Clermont
Le Mans scores in 80% of games (24 of 30 meczów), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 meczów).
Clermont scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 meczów), while Le Mans keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Le Mans
Over / Under - Clermont
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Le Mans is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.7 pts / game - Le Mans · 1 pts / game - Clermont
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Le Mans - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Clermont - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Le Mans
Clermont
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).
Teams vs league
| Le Mans | Liga | Clermont | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.47 | 2.45 | • 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 65% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Le Mans's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Clermont. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Le Mans vs Clermont?
The Ligue 2 match finished Le Mans 1:0 Clermont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Le Mans vs Clermont?
Le Mans score 1.50 goals per game on average and Clermont 1.13. The Ligue 2 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Le Mans's matches and 60% of Clermont's.
What form are Le Mans and Clermont in?
Over the last 5 games Le Mans have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Clermont 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Le Mans vs Clermont?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


