Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

Leopards vs Tusker: match statistics

Leopards crest
Leopards
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Tusker crest
Tusker
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Leopards are in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and securing 2.6 PPG. The hosts boast an impressive home record with a 60% win rate and only a 10% loss rate, scoring an average of 1.6 goals while conceding just 0.7 goals per game. Tusker, despite a decent away record (58% win rate), shows greater instability with a 33% away loss rate and worse form over their last five games (1.8 PPG). The difference in goal difference is clear - Leopards are at +9 in home matches, while Tusker is only at +3 away. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (0.76 vs 0.7 for the visitors), and Leopards fail to score less frequently at home (30% FTS) than Tusker does on the road. Considering Leopards' superiority in form, home efficiency, and defensive stability, a home win is the most probable scenario.

Leopards vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Leopards played against Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Leopards has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Tusker has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Leopards scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.75. Tusker scores 0.96 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Leopards's games and 42% of Tusker's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tusker has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.40 per game. Leopards takes 8.8 shots per game, while Tusker takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Leopards leads at halftime in 4% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Tusker leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Leopards's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (21 goals). For Tusker, it is minutes 0-15 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kenyan Premier League games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Leopards are in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and securing 2.6 PPG. The hosts boast an impressive home record with a 60% win rate and only a 10% loss rate, scoring an average of 1.6 goals while conceding just 0.7 goals per game. Tusker, despite a decent away record (58% win rate), shows greater instability with a 33% away loss rate and worse form over their last five games (1.8 PPG). The difference in goal difference is clear - Leopards are at +9 in home matches, while Tusker is only at +3 away. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (0.76 vs 0.7 for the visitors), and Leopards fail to score less frequently at home (30% FTS) than Tusker does on the road. Considering Leopards' superiority in form, home efficiency, and defensive stability, a home win is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
LeopardsTusker
9Shots8
LeopardsTusker
4Shots on target3
LeopardsTusker
1.23xG1.09
LeopardsTusker
6Corners2
LeopardsTusker
52Dangerous attacks51
LeopardsTusker
-1Fouls-1
LeopardsTusker
-1Cards-1
LeopardsTusker

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game0.96
LeopardsTusker
0.75Goals allowed / game1
LeopardsTusker
47%Average possession51%
LeopardsTusker
3.17Shots on target / game3.92
LeopardsTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.83Shots per game11.63
LeopardsTusker
3.17Shots on target3.92
LeopardsTusker
15.1%Shot conversion8.2%
LeopardsTusker
47%Possession51%
LeopardsTusker
1.4xG for1.49
LeopardsTusker
1.3xG against1.37
LeopardsTusker

Shooting quality

Leopards: Counter-attackingTusker: Balanced
LeopardsTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tusker is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Leopards · 1.8 pts / game - Tusker

Leopards
DWLWL
Season result split
54% W29% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-4
1.92 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tusker
LWWLW
Season result split
46% W17% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-9
1.54 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leopards is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - Leopards · 0.96 goals / game - Tusker

Leopards is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - Leopards · 1 goals / game - Tusker

Leopards scoring profile: strong

Leopards scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 meczów).

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)23
LeopardsTusker
18Goals conceded (season)24
LeopardsTusker
2.08Average goals per game1.96
LeopardsTusker
8Goals scored (last 5)6
LeopardsTusker
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
LeopardsTusker

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal75%
LeopardsTusker
42%2 goals21%
LeopardsTusker
8%3 goals0%
LeopardsTusker
8%4 goals0%
LeopardsTusker

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal63%
LeopardsTusker
13%2 goals25%
LeopardsTusker
4%3 goals8%
LeopardsTusker
4%4 goals4%
LeopardsTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time4%
LeopardsTusker
4%BTTS in both halves0%
LeopardsTusker
8%Scored in both halves4%
LeopardsTusker

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
LeopardsTusker
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
LeopardsTusker
60%BTTS - last 540%
LeopardsTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

21%Min. 1 goal before half-time38%
LeopardsTusker
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
LeopardsTusker
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
LeopardsTusker

2nd half

29%Min. 1 goal after half-time25%
LeopardsTusker
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time8%
LeopardsTusker
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LeopardsTusker

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tusker is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Leopards · 1.13 pts / game - Tusker

Leopards - half-time state
4% leading88% draw8% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
17% leading63% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.13
LeopardsTusker
0.13Goals scored (1st half)0.21
LeopardsTusker
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
LeopardsTusker
0.29Average goals (1st half)0.54
LeopardsTusker
83%Clean sheet before half-time79%
LeopardsTusker
88%No goal before half-time79%
LeopardsTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per game (2nd half)1.33
LeopardsTusker
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
LeopardsTusker
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.08
LeopardsTusker
0.58Average goals (2nd half)0.33
LeopardsTusker
83%Clean sheet after half-time92%
LeopardsTusker
75%No goal after half-time75%
LeopardsTusker

Leopards - second-half results

17% W79% R4% P
24
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding1350%

Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tusker - second-half results

17% W83% R0% P
27
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding271%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Leopards - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.20.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Leopards
ScoredConceded
21
12
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (21 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
13
17
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+98%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Leopards

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 66% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 57% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

LeopardsLigaTusker
Average goals per game 2.082.08 1.96
Both teams scored 42%47% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%35% 33%
Clean sheets 46%33% 38%
Goal before half-time 21%23% 38%
Goal after half-time 29%25% 25%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / game
1.03
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
23%
1 goal
9%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
25%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Leopards's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tusker. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Leopards vs Tusker?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Leopards 1:0 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Leopards vs Tusker?

Leopards score 1.33 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.96. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Leopards's matches and 42% of Tusker's.

What form are Leopards and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games Leopards have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tusker 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Leopards vs Tusker?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.