Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Liepāja plays BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game is scheduled for September 19, 2026. Venue: Stadions Daugava.
Recent form
Liepāja has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Liepāja scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 1.43. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.17 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.90 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Liepāja's games and 53% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Liepāja has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.56 per game. Liepāja takes 13.4 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Liepāja leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Liepāja's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.90 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 86% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Liepāja | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Liepāja is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Liepāja · 1 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Liepāja is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.37 goals / game - Liepāja · 1.17 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils
BFC Daugavpils is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Liepāja · 1.17 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils
Liepāja scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 games), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 games).
BFC Daugavpils scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 games), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Liepāja
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Liepāja
BFC Daugavpils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Liepāja | Liga | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.80 | 2.90 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 54% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 25% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Liepāja's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 3.29 goals, and both teams scored in 86% of them.
FAQ
When do Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils play?
Liepāja face BFC Daugavpils on September 19, 2026 in Virsliga at Stadions Daugava. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 3, BFC Daugavpils won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 86% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?
Liepāja score 1.37 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.17. The Virsliga average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Liepāja's matches and 53% of BFC Daugavpils's.
What form are Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils in?
Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?
The statistical background for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.