Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics
Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Liepāja played against BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Stadions Daugava. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Liepāja has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Liepāja scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 1.43. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.17 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.90 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Liepāja's games and 53% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Liepāja has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.56 per game. Liepāja takes 13.4 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Liepāja leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Liepāja's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.90 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 86% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Liepāja have a clear home advantage: they have won 62% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.00 goals per game, while BFC Daugavpils have won just 14% of their away fixtures. The hosts are also in better current form, scoring 8 goals and collecting 8 points from their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have failed to win during this period, scoring only 4 goals and earning 3 points. Daugavpils’ away defense concedes an average of 1.57 goals, with an xG against of 1.65, highlighting genuine problems in limiting opponents’ chances. Liepāja average 5.08 shots on target at home compared with Daugavpils’ 4.29 away, while the hosts’ conversion rate stands at 17% versus 10% for the visitors. A draw remains possible, as BFC Daugavpils have drawn 43% of their away matches, but Liepāja’s superior quality and current form point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal profile is uneven: BFC Daugavpils record BTTS in 71% of matches, while Liepāja do so in only 38%; however, both teams produced this outcome in 60% of their last five matches. Liepāja have recently averaged 1.6 goals per match, while Daugavpils concede 1.2, which supports the prospect of a home goal. The visitors have scored just 0.8 goals across their last five appearances, but Liepāja’s defense allows opponents an xG of 1.60, while Daugavpils create an average xG of 1.49. In addition, the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their matches this season, compared with just 14% for the visitors, so a complete shutout by either side is not the most likely scenario. The BTTS signal is moderate, but the current frequency of both teams scoring and the xG figures slightly outweigh the arguments for BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals, as this outcome occurred in 81% of Liepāja’s matches and 64% of BFC Daugavpils’ games. Liepāja score an average of 1.13 goals per match, while Daugavpils average just 1.21, with the visitors scoring only 0.8 goals per game across their last five appearances. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 38% of matches, whereas Daugavpils have exceeded 1.5 goals scored only once in five games. However, their attacking potential is sufficient to produce goals, with both teams recording average xG figures of 1.62 and 1.49, and the forecast standing at 2.48 total goals. At the same time, reaching the four-goal mark would require significantly above-average finishing, which is inconsistent with the season-long results and the visitors’ poor scoring form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Liepāja win after 90 minutes, as the hosts were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 57% for Daugavpils. Both teams tend to play very cautiously in the first half: Liepāja score an average of 0.50 goals and concede just 0.13, while the visitors score only 0.21. After the break, the quality advantage should shift towards the hosts, who have won 50% of their league matches this season, compared with just 14% for Daugavpils, while over the last five rounds they averaged 1.6 goals against 0.8 for their opponents. Daugavpils concede an average of 1.57 goals per match, including 1.14 after half-time, whereas Liepāja averaged 1.0 goal in the second halves of their last five games. Liepāja’s higher xG of 1.62 compared with the visitors’ 1.49, as well as their average of 4.81 shots on target per match against 4.29, further support a final home win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Liepāja | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Liepāja is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Liepāja · 1 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Liepāja is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.37 goals / game - Liepāja · 1.17 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils
BFC Daugavpils is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Liepāja · 1.17 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils
Liepāja scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 games), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 games).
BFC Daugavpils scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 games), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Liepāja
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Liepāja
BFC Daugavpils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Liepāja | Liga | BFC Daugavpils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.80 | 2.90 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 54% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 25% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Liepāja's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 3.29 goals, and both teams scored in 86% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?
The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 0:0 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 3, BFC Daugavpils won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 86% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?
Liepāja score 1.37 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.17. The Virsliga average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Liepāja's matches and 53% of BFC Daugavpils's.
What form are Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils in?
Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?
The statistical background for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


