Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

Liepāja vs Ogre United: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Ogre United crest
Ogre United

Liepāja vs Ogre United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Liepāja played against Ogre United in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 12, 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Recent form

Liepāja has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Ogre United has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Liepāja scores 0.91 goals per game and allows 1.55. Ogre United scores 0.82 and allows 2.27. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of Liepāja's games and 64% of Ogre United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 45%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Liepāja has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.01 per game. Liepāja takes 11.4 shots per game, while Ogre United takes 8.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Liepāja leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Ogre United leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Liepāja's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Ogre United, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win: Liepāja (6th) has 3 wins, 3 draws and 5 losses this season with 10 goals scored, and at home they average 1.0 goals scored and 1.2 conceded per match. The decisive edge is defense — Ogre United concede 3.5 goals per away match and have 25 goals conceded overall this season, while Liepāja have 17 conceded; the visitors have no away wins and a 100% loss rate on the road. Offensively Liepāja average 3.2 shots on target per home game with a 12% conversion rate, whereas Ogre on the road average 2.5 shots on target, 0.5 goals per match and only a 7% conversion, and in 50% of away fixtures they fail to score. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 5 goals each, but Liepāja conceded 10 versus Ogre’s 16 conceded, indicating the visitors have been significantly worse defensively recently. Considering the home defensive superiority, better finishing quality and Ogre’s catastrophic away numbers, I assess the probabilities as: 72% Liepāja win, 18% draw and 10% Ogre win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS (Both Teams To Score) scenario looks more likely: Liepāja has a season BTTS rate of 71% vs 50% for Ogre United, while the league average is 57% of matches with both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% (3/5). In those five games Liepāja scored 5 and conceded 10 (1.0 GF and 2.0 GA per game); Ogre scored 5 and conceded 16 (1.0 and 3.2 per game). Seasonally Liepāja averages 1.0 goals per game with xG 1.05 and concedes 1.57, whereas Ogre averages 0.5 goals per game with xG 0.94 and concedes 3.5, indicating both sides generate chances (xG ~1.0) but are vulnerable at the back. Additionally, neither team has a clean sheet this season (0% clean sheets); Ogre allows on average 2.5 shots on target vs 2.0 for Liepāja, and the league averages 3.04 goals per match — this further supports a goal on both ends. Considering 71% vs 50% BTTS, 60% in the last 5, and high average concessions of 1.57/3.5, I estimate BTTS probability at 75% and No BTTS at 25%, so the recommended play is BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistics favor the Over market, specifically the 2.5 goals line. Based on the last 5 matches Liepāja has an average xG of 1.36, while Ogre United concedes an average of 2.11 xG in those games, yielding about 1.74 expected goals for the home side; conversely Ogre has 0.99 xG in the last 5 matches and Liepāja concedes 1.61 xG, giving 1.30 expected goals for the away side — total = 3.04 expected goals. Additionally the league average is 3.04 goals per game, Ogre have 75% of matches above 2.5 goals this season, and both teams had 60% of matches Over 2.5 in their last 5 fixtures, which increases the probability of goals. Defensive context confirms this picture: Liepāja concedes on average 1.57 goals this season, Ogre concedes as many as 3.5, with xG against of 1.83 and 2.29 respectively, therefore I pick the Over on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ogre United have lost 100% of their matches this season and concede on average 3.5 goals per game, while Liepāja score on average 1.0 goals at home and have an xG of 1.05 versus an xG against of 1.83, indicating a home advantage in chance creation and weaker opponent defense. At half-time Liepāja score on average 0.43 goals and draw in 43% of their matches, whereas the visitors have not led at the break in any fixture this season and have been losing after 45 minutes in 75% of games, which increases the likelihood of a draw or a minimal home lead at the break. After the break the hosts are more active – the hosts’ average goals in second halves is 1.29 and 100% of their matches have featured more than 0.5 goals after half-time, so the second half often delivers the decisive moments. On this basis the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Liepāja win after 90 minutes (X/1), assigned 50% probability; 1/1 is given 20% as an alternative, and X/X is given 18% due to the high proportion of HT draws and defensive instability. Other combinations, including away wins, are judged unlikely (together ~12%) given the visitors’ 0% wins and their average concession of 3.5 goals per match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
3 : 1
Second half

Game stats

67Possession (%)33
LiepājaOgre United
16Shots5
LiepājaOgre United
9Shots on target2
LiepājaOgre United
2.1xG0.63
LiepājaOgre United
9Corners2
LiepājaOgre United
64Dangerous attacks23
LiepājaOgre United
15Fouls10
LiepājaOgre United
2Cards1
LiepājaOgre United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

LiepājaOgre United
0.91Goals scored / game0.82
LiepājaOgre United
1.55Goals allowed / game2.27
LiepājaOgre United
52%Average possession44%
LiepājaOgre United
3.45Shots on target / game2.18
LiepājaOgre United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.36Shots per game8.64
LiepājaOgre United
3.45Shots on target2.18
LiepājaOgre United
8%Shot conversion9.5%
LiepājaOgre United
52%Possession44%
LiepājaOgre United
1.35xG for1.01
LiepājaOgre United
1.43xG against2
LiepājaOgre United

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedOgre United: Balanced
LiepājaOgre United
Accuracy (shots on target)30%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Liepāja is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Liepāja · 0.2 pts / game - Ogre United

Liepāja
DWDLL
Season result split
27% W27% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-5
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ogre United
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W27% R73% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-8
0.27 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 2.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liepāja is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

0.91 goals / game - Liepāja · 0.82 goals / game - Ogre United

Liepāja is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - Liepāja · 2.27 goals / game - Ogre United

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while Ogre United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 meczów).

Ogre United scoring profile: very strong

Ogre United scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)9
LiepājaOgre United
17Goals conceded (season)25
LiepājaOgre United
2.45Average goals per game3.09
LiepājaOgre United
5Goals scored (last 5)5
LiepājaOgre United
10Goals conceded (last 5)16
LiepājaOgre United

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal64%
LiepājaOgre United
27%2 goals9%
LiepājaOgre United
0%3 goals9%
LiepājaOgre United
0%4 goals0%
LiepājaOgre United

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal100%
LiepājaOgre United
36%2 goals55%
LiepājaOgre United
9%3 goals27%
LiepājaOgre United
9%4 goals27%
LiepājaOgre United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time9%
LiepājaOgre United
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LiepājaOgre United
9%Scored in both halves0%
LiepājaOgre United

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
LiepājaOgre United
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
LiepājaOgre United
60%BTTS - last 560%
LiepājaOgre United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
LiepājaOgre United
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
LiepājaOgre United
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
LiepājaOgre United

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
LiepājaOgre United
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
LiepājaOgre United
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
LiepājaOgre United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liepāja is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Liepāja · 0.64 pts / game - Ogre United

Liepāja - half-time state
27% leading18% draw55% trailing
Ogre United - half-time state
9% leading36% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.64
LiepājaOgre United
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.27
LiepājaOgre United
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
LiepājaOgre United
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.36
LiepājaOgre United
45%Clean sheet before half-time36%
LiepājaOgre United
73%No goal before half-time91%
LiepājaOgre United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per game (2nd half)1.18
LiepājaOgre United
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
LiepājaOgre United
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
LiepājaOgre United
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.73
LiepājaOgre United
27%Clean sheet after half-time36%
LiepājaOgre United
55%No goal after half-time45%
LiepājaOgre United

Liepāja - second-half results

27% W27% R45% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ogre United - second-half results

36% W9% R55% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Liepāja - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ogre United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game1.22.0
Average goals per game1.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ogre United
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
6
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Ogre United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.99
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaOgre United
Average goals per game 2.452.96 3.09
Both teams scored 55%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%51% 45%
Clean sheets 9%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 82%74% 64%
Goal after half-time 91%86% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defensive advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaYellow cardVladislavs Sorokins
  2. Ogre UnitedSubstitutionOn: Roberts AdītājsOff: Dāvis Vējkrīgers
  3. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Ingars PūlisOff: Amar Haïdara
  4. LiepājaYellow cardIngars Pūlis
  5. LiepājaGoalDjibril Gueye
  6. Ogre UnitedGoalKristers Čudars
  7. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Chovanie AmatkarijoOff: Ingars Pūlis
  8. Ogre UnitedYellow cardKristers Čudars
  9. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Kyvon LeidsmanOff: Ivans Patrikejevs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Liepāja's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ogre United. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Ogre United?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 4:1 Ogre United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Ogre United?

Liepāja score 0.91 goals per game on average and Ogre United 0.82. The Virsliga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Liepāja's matches and 64% of Ogre United's.

What form are Liepāja and Ogre United in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ogre United 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Ogre United?

The statistical background for Liepāja vs Ogre United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.