Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing: match statistics
Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Liverpool FC Montevideo played against Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Parque Alfredo Víctor Viera. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Liverpool FC Montevideo has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Racing has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Liverpool FC Montevideo scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.25. Racing scores 1.50 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Liverpool FC Montevideo's games and 56% of Racing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 38%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Racing has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.38 per game. Liverpool FC Montevideo takes 11.3 shots per game, while Racing takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Liverpool FC Montevideo leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Racing leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Liverpool FC Montevideo's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Racing, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing is the favorite for this match: they sit 2nd in the table while Liverpool FC Montevideo are 7th; the visitors have 10 wins this season versus the hosts' 5. In their last five games Racing averages 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), whereas the hosts average only 0.8 points per game (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses). Defensively Racing performs better — they concede an average of 0.86 goals away, while Liverpool concede 1.43 at home; over the season the visitors have conceded 14 goals compared to the hosts' 20. Chance quality also favors Racing: average xG is 1.56 for the visitors versus 1.40 for the hosts, and the hosts have a higher percentage of matches without scoring (29% vs 14%) despite 54% possession at home. Considering the advantage in number of wins (10 vs 5), higher average points in the last 5 matches (1.6 vs 0.8) and lower average goals conceded (0.86 vs 1.43), I predict a Racing win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season indicators show a moderate bias toward BTTS: home teams have BTTS in 56% of matches, away teams in 57%, with a league average of 54%. Offensively both sides generate similar xG (home 1.57 vs away 1.56) and score on average 1.56 and 1.43 goals per match, so both can create offensive threat. Defensively they concede on average 0.89 (home) and 0.86 (away) seasonally, but xG against is 1.04 for home and 1.22 for away, suggesting the away side exposes themselves to more scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches home had BTTS in 60% (scored 6, conceded 7; avg 1.2 and 1.4), away in 40% (scored 4, conceded 4; avg 0.8 and 0.8), with home posting more shots on target 4.78 vs 3.86. Considering season BTTS ~56–57%, similar offensive xG 1.57/1.56 and higher xG against for away (1.22), I favor the 'yes' market — 62% for 'yes' and 38% for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
After balancing attack and defense data, expected goals are 1.30 for Liverpool FC Montevideo and 1.23 for Racing, yielding a total of 2.53 goals. Home attack xG is 1.57 versus 1.56 for the away side, while xG conceded is 1.04 (home) and 1.22 (away), which supports a ~2.5 goals forecast. Seasonally, home matches have finished with over 1.5 goals in 67% of cases and away matches in 71%; additionally, the percentage of fixtures where both teams scored is 56% and 57%, respectively, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. Poisson calculations with λ=2.53 produce roughly a 72% probability for Over 1.5, about 46% for Over 2.5 and ~25% for Over 3.5, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. The hosts average 4.78 shots on target versus 3.86 for their opponents and have a higher conversion rate (13% vs 11%), which further supports Over 1.5 as the best option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Racing appears the favorite for the final victory: they have a 71% win rate this season and average 2.29 points per game versus 56% and 2.0 for the home side, so the pick on the away win is the strongest. Historically the hosts have led at the break more often (56% vs 29%) and score on average 0.89 goals by half-time versus 0.57 for Racing, but the last five matches reverse the trend — the away side led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%) while the hosts did so in 0 of 5, and the half-time points average is 2.2 vs 0.4. Additionally the visitors have scored 2 goals in minutes 0–15 versus 1 for the hosts, and the xG of both teams is almost identical (1.57 vs 1.56), which suggests current form and finishing are decisive. As a result I expect Racing to hold the lead before or shortly after half-time and to see out the win, hence 2/2 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Liverpool FC Montevideo | Racing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Racing is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.6 pts / game - Racing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.5 goals / game - Racing
Racing is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 0.88 goals / game - Racing
Liverpool FC Montevideo scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
Racing scores in 94% of games (15 of 16 meczów), while Liverpool FC Montevideo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Liverpool FC Montevideo
Over / Under - Racing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Liverpool FC Montevideo · 1.75 pts / game - Racing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Liverpool FC Montevideo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Racing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Liverpool FC Montevideo
Racing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Liverpool FC Montevideo | Liga | Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.56 | 2.51 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 76% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Liverpool FC MontevideoSubstitutionOn: Renzo Neri Machado PertussoOff: Rúben Daniel Bentancourt Morales
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Liverpool FC Montevideo's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Racing. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?
The Primera División match finished Liverpool FC Montevideo 0:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Liverpool FC Montevideo and Racing?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Liverpool FC Montevideo won 0, Racing won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?
Liverpool FC Montevideo score 1.31 goals per game on average and Racing 1.50. The Primera División average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Liverpool FC Montevideo's matches and 56% of Racing's.
What form are Liverpool FC Montevideo and Racing in?
Over the last 5 games Liverpool FC Montevideo have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Racing 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing?
The statistical background for Liverpool FC Montevideo vs Racing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.