Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics
Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Los Angeles FC played against SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Los Angeles FC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. SJ Earthquakes has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Los Angeles FC scores 2.14 goals per game and allows 0.29. SJ Earthquakes scores 1.86 and allows 0.29. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 14% of Los Angeles FC's games and 14% of SJ Earthquakes's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Los Angeles FC has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.57 per game. Los Angeles FC takes 14.9 shots per game, while SJ Earthquakes takes 14.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Los Angeles FC leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.29 goals per game after halftime. SJ Earthquakes leads at halftime in 57% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Los Angeles FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For SJ Earthquakes, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Los Angeles FC have very strong home metrics: 4 wins in their last 4 home matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home game, translating to 100% wins and 100% clean sheets at home. San Jose Earthquakes arrive in good form — 3 wins in their last 3 away trips, averaging 1.67 goals scored and only 0.33 conceded on the road; across their last 5 matches they average 2.4 points per game (4 wins, 1 loss). In chance creation the hosts are clearly superior: LAFC average 14.0 shots and 6.0 on target per home match versus SJ’s 8.0 shots and 3.0 on target away, and the hosts’ xG at home is 1.59 against the visitors’ 0.98 xG on the road. The defensive differential also favors LA — although xG against them at home is 1.61, they actually concede 0.0 goals, while SJ has xG against 1.42 and actually concedes 0.33 goals away, so the hosts hold an advantage both in chance volume and effective defense. Given these figures I predict a home win (1); suggested probabilities: home 55%, draw 20%, away 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators point to a low likelihood of both teams scoring — Los Angeles FC has 0% BTTS at home, SJ Earthquakes 33%, versus a league average of 56%. Both sides record many clean sheets: LAFC 75% and SJ 67%, with average goals conceded of 0.25 and 0.33 per match (2 conceded each this season), which reduces the probability of Goal/Goal. LAFC’s attack is potent (2.0 goals and xG 2.01, 7 shots on target and 19.25 shots per match), whereas SJ posts 1.67 goals, xG 0.98, 3 shots on target and 8 shots, so the hosts will be the main source of threat while SJ has limited chance creation. In the last 5 matches LAFC averaged 2.2 scored and 0.6 conceded, SJ 1.8 scored and 0.4 conceded — the low conceded averages (0.6 and 0.4) and high clean sheet rates support a No Goal (clean sheet expected) outcome, therefore I propose a 75% vs 25% split.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on average xG and opponent defenses yields expected goals: home 1.72, away 0.85, total 2.57. Los Angeles FC records xG 2.01 and averages 19.25 shots (7.0 on target) per match with 2.0 goals scored on average, while San Jose has xG 0.98, 8.0 shots (3.0 on target) and 1.67 goals on average — indicating a clear home advantage in chance creation. Despite this, both teams display strong defensive numbers: LAFC concedes only 0.25 goals per match and has 75% clean sheets, and San Jose concedes 0.33 goals, which limits the likelihood of very high-scoring outcomes. Translating the expected 2.57 goals into a Poisson distribution gives roughly a 73% probability of at least 2 goals, about 48% for 3 or more, and around 26% for 4 or more, making over 1.5 the strongest market. Therefore I recommend over 1.5 as the best line to play, while over 2.5 and 3.5 carry higher risk given both teams’ defensive effectiveness.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Los Angeles FC has a seasonal goals average of 2.0 with an average conceded of 0.25, while San Jose scores 1.67 and concedes 0.33, giving the hosts the advantage in goal balance. LAFC also has a higher xG of 2.01 versus 0.98 and averages 19.25 shots (7 on target) compared to the visitors’ 8 shots (3 on target), so they create more and better scoring chances. At Half-Time the hosts led in 3 of 4 matches (75%) and score an average of 1.5 goals by the break versus the visitors’ 0.67, while the hosts’ seasonal clean sheet rate is 75% (visitors 67%), which suggests maintenance of the lead. Although San Jose are in good form (4 wins in 5, 80% over the last 5), their lower xG and fewer shots limit the likelihood of a turnaround, therefore the most probable scenario from the data is 1/1 (HT/FT).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Los Angeles FC | SJ Earthquakes | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
SJ Earthquakes is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Los Angeles FC · 2.4 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Los Angeles FC is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
2.14 goals / game - Los Angeles FC · 1.86 goals / game - SJ Earthquakes
Los Angeles FC scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).
SJ Earthquakes scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 86% (6 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Los Angeles FC
Over / Under - SJ Earthquakes
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SJ Earthquakes is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - Los Angeles FC · 2 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Los Angeles FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SJ Earthquakes - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 86%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Los Angeles FC
SJ Earthquakes
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Los Angeles FC | Liga | SJ Earthquakes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.43 | 3.16 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 14% | 57% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 63% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 86% | 24% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 74% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 81% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?
The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 1:4 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?
Los Angeles FC score 2.14 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 1.86. The MLS average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 14% of SJ Earthquakes's.
What form are Los Angeles FC and SJ Earthquakes in?
Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


