United States - MLSData current as of 16 July 2026

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC play SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match date is 20 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.60 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 2.27 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 40%, SJ Earthquakes 60%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 53%, SJ Earthquakes 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.58. Los Angeles FC: 14.3 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 14.0.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 61-75 (6 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Los Angeles FC have very strong home metrics: 4 wins in their last 4 home matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home game, translating to 100% wins and 100% clean sheets at home. San Jose Earthquakes arrive in good form — 3 wins in their last 3 away trips, averaging 1.67 goals scored and only 0.33 conceded on the road; across their last 5 matches they average 2.4 points per game (4 wins, 1 loss). In chance creation the hosts are clearly superior: LAFC average 14.0 shots and 6.0 on target per home match versus SJ’s 8.0 shots and 3.0 on target away, and the hosts’ xG at home is 1.59 against the visitors’ 0.98 xG on the road. The defensive differential also favors LA — although xG against them at home is 1.61, they actually concede 0.0 goals, while SJ has xG against 1.42 and actually concedes 0.33 goals away, so the hosts hold an advantage both in chance volume and effective defense. Given these figures I predict a home win (1); suggested probabilities: home 55%, draw 20%, away 25%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 4
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
16Shots12
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Shots on target5
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.55xG1.37
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
5Corners3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
45Dangerous attacks36
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13Fouls10
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Cards3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.6Goals scored / match2.27
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.13Goals conceded / match1
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
48%Average possession47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
4.73Shots on target / match5.6
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.27Shots per match14
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
4.73Shots on target5.6
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
11.2%Shot conversion16.2%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
48%Possession47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.62xG for1.58
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.36xG against1.4
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: AttackingSJ Earthquakes: Counter-attacking
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJ Earthquakes is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC
DLLLW
Season result split
47% W20% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-5
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
SJ Earthquakes
DDLLW
Season result split
67% W13% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-3
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 2.27 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

SJ Earthquakes is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 matches).

24Goals scored (season)34
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
17Goals conceded (season)15
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2.73Average goals in match3.27
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal93%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
40%2 goals67%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13%3 goals47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
7%4 goals13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal67%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
40%2 goals20%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
20%3 goals13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time33%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
7%BTTS in both halves13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
20%Scored in both halves40%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.8 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.8
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1.07
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.53
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
67%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
67%No goal before half-time27%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
60%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
27%No goal after half-time40%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

47% W40% R13% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding235%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match1.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match2.21.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 2.733.30 3.27
Both teams scored 40%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%62% 60%
Clean sheets 60%21% 33%
Goal before half-time 53%78% 87%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 1:4 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

Los Angeles FC score 1.60 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 2.27. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 60% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.