Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara: match statistics

Lugazi Municipal crest
Lugazi Municipal
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Kitara crest
Kitara

Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lugazi Municipal play Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Lugazi Municipal: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lugazi Municipal scores 0.63 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lugazi Municipal 30%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Lugazi Municipal 37%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.28. Lugazi Municipal: 8.2 shots per match, Kitara: 11.3.

Match halves

Lugazi Municipal: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.30. Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Lugazi Municipal: 76-90+ (9 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The statistical favorite is the away side: Kitara sit 3rd in the table vs Lugazi’s 13th, with 14 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 4, have scored 31 goals vs Lugazi’s 16 and conceded 13 vs the hosts’ 32. Recent form also favors Kitara — Lugazi have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses (0.4 points per game) and just 1 goal in five matches, while Kitara have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 points per game) and have scored 5 while conceding 1 in their last five. In terms of chance quality the visitors perform better: on average 4.27 SOT per away match vs 3.27 SOT for the hosts, xG for Kitara away is 1.63 vs 1.50 xG for Lugazi at home, and xG against is 1.48 for Kitara vs 1.79 for Lugazi, suggesting the hosts allow opponents more valuable opportunities. Defensively Kitara’s advantage is clear — the visitors concede 0.67 goals per away game and keep 42% clean sheets, while Lugazi at home concede 1.17 goals and have 25% clean sheets; although Kitara average only 0.83 goals away, their higher xG (1.63) and greater SOT with a slightly higher conversion rate (8% vs 7%) indicate potential for improved finishing. Given the table advantage, better defense (0.67 vs 1.17), higher xG and SOT and form (1.6 vs 0.4 pts per game in the last 5), I forecast an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
11Shots10
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
3Shots on target4
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
1.19xG1.17
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
2Corners3
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
38Dangerous attacks35
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
-1Fouls-1
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
-1Cards-1
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.63Goals scored / match1.38
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
1.2Goals conceded / match0.72
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
40%Average possession46%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
2.13Shots on target / match4.69
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.2Shots per match11.31
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
2.13Shots on target4.69
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
7.7%Shot conversion12.2%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
40%Possession46%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
1.28xG for1.65
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
1.74xG against1.31
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Shooting quality

Lugazi Municipal: BalancedKitara: Counter-attacking
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)26%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lugazi Municipal
WLDDL
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-15
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

0.63 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara

Lugazi Municipal scoring profile: more difficult

Lugazi Municipal scores in 37% of matches (11 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Lugazi Municipal keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

19Goals scored (season)40
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
36Goals conceded (season)21
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
1.83Average goals in match2.1
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
2Goals scored (last 5)7
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

How often they score at least...

37%1 goal76%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
13%2 goals41%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
7%3 goals14%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
3%4 goals7%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal55%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
37%2 goals14%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
13%3 goals3%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
3%4 goals0%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time10%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
13%Scored in both halves21%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0%BTTS - last 560%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal · 1.93 pts / match - Kitara

Lugazi Municipal - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.93
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.34
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.24
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
63%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
77%No goal before half-time38%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.86
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
53%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara
77%No goal after half-time66%
Lugazi MunicipalKitara

Lugazi Municipal - second-half results

13% W53% R33% P
33
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lugazi Municipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lugazi Municipal
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
4
31-45
0
8
46-60
0
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+104%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lugazi Municipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
47% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
47%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Lugazi MunicipalLigaKitara
Average goals in match 1.832.09 2.10
Both teams scored 30%38% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%35% 31%
Clean sheets 33%39% 45%
Goal before half-time 53%59% 76%
Goal after half-time 57%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lugazi Municipal 0 - 0 - 1 Kitara. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kitara
4 : 0
Lugazi Municipal

FAQ

What was the result of Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Lugazi Municipal 1:2 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara?

Lugazi Municipal score 0.63 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.38. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Lugazi Municipal's matches and 38% of Kitara's.

What form are Lugazi Municipal and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games Lugazi Municipal have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kitara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lugazi Municipal vs Kitara: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.