Italy - Serie BData current as of 18 July 2026

Mantova vs Cesena: match statistics

Mantova crest
Mantova
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Cesena crest
Cesena
135%(2.34)
X35%(3.30)
230%(2.73)

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Mantova presents solid home form with a 40% home win rate and a favorable goal difference in their last 5 matches (8 scored, 6 conceded). The home team dominates in ball possession (61%) and creates more chances (1.75 xG). Cesena, on the other hand, shows an identical away win rate (40%), although their recent form raises concerns (0 wins in 5 matches, only 0.6 points per match). The visitors have lower xG statistics (1.26) and find the net less frequently on the road (1.13 goals/match). Taking into account Mantova's advantage in home games and Cesena's weaker disposition in recent weeks, combined with the similarity in overall efficiency indicators, a draw or a narrow victory for the hosts seems to be the most likely outcome.

Mantova vs Cesena: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mantova play Cesena in Serie B (Italy). The match date is 17 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Mantova: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Cesena: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mantova scores 1.18 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Cesena scores 1.18 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mantova 50%, Cesena 61%. Over 2.5: Mantova 53%, Cesena 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Mantova has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.45. Mantova: 14.1 shots per match, Cesena: 13.1.

Match halves

Mantova: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.63. Cesena: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Mantova: 76-90+ (15 goals). Cesena: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Mantova presents solid home form with a 40% home win rate and a favorable goal difference in their last 5 matches (8 scored, 6 conceded). The home team dominates in ball possession (61%) and creates more chances (1.75 xG). Cesena, on the other hand, shows an identical away win rate (40%), although their recent form raises concerns (0 wins in 5 matches, only 0.6 points per match). The visitors have lower xG statistics (1.26) and find the net less frequently on the road (1.13 goals/match). Taking into account Mantova's advantage in home games and Cesena's weaker disposition in recent weeks, combined with the similarity in overall efficiency indicators, a draw or a narrow victory for the hosts seems to be the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
MantovaCesena
20Shots13
MantovaCesena
4Shots on target3
MantovaCesena
2.03xG1.3
MantovaCesena
5Corners3
MantovaCesena
68Dangerous attacks37
MantovaCesena
20Fouls16
MantovaCesena
1Cards2
MantovaCesena

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.18
MantovaCesena
1.5Goals conceded / match1.47
MantovaCesena
57%Average possession50%
MantovaCesena
4.79Shots on target / match4.11
MantovaCesena

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.08Shots per match13.13
MantovaCesena
4.79Shots on target4.11
MantovaCesena
8.4%Shot conversion9%
MantovaCesena
57%Possession50%
MantovaCesena
1.55xG for1.45
MantovaCesena
1.42xG against1.47
MantovaCesena

Shooting quality

Mantova: DominantCesena: Balanced
MantovaCesena
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mantova is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Mantova · 0.4 pts / match - Cesena

Mantova
WLWWL
Season result split
34% W18% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-18
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-3-7
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Cesena
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W26% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-16
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mantova scoring profile: very strong

Mantova scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Cesena keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).

Cesena scoring profile: very strong

Cesena scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Mantova keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

45Goals scored (season)45
MantovaCesena
57Goals conceded (season)56
MantovaCesena
2.68Average goals in match2.66
MantovaCesena
8Goals scored (last 5)3
MantovaCesena
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
MantovaCesena

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal71%
MantovaCesena
37%2 goals34%
MantovaCesena
11%3 goals13%
MantovaCesena
3%4 goals0%
MantovaCesena

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal82%
MantovaCesena
39%2 goals39%
MantovaCesena
18%3 goals21%
MantovaCesena
8%4 goals5%
MantovaCesena

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time26%
MantovaCesena
5%BTTS in both halves3%
MantovaCesena
26%Scored in both halves21%
MantovaCesena

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
MantovaCesena
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
MantovaCesena
20%BTTS - last 520%
MantovaCesena

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
MantovaCesena
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
MantovaCesena
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
MantovaCesena

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
MantovaCesena
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
MantovaCesena
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MantovaCesena

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mantova - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Cesena - half-time state
24% leading45% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.16
MantovaCesena
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.58
MantovaCesena
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
MantovaCesena
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.26
MantovaCesena
53%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MantovaCesena
58%No goal before half-time53%
MantovaCesena

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.03
MantovaCesena
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
MantovaCesena
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
MantovaCesena
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.39
MantovaCesena
50%Clean sheet after half-time42%
MantovaCesena
47%No goal after half-time55%
MantovaCesena

Mantova - second-half results

34% W29% R37% P
46
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cesena - second-half results

21% W39% R39% P
44
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mantova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Cesena - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mantova
ScoredConceded
4
13
0-15
7
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
5
11
46-60
4
8
61-75
15
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Cesena
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
5
12
16-30
12
8
31-45
10
10
46-60
5
9
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mantova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Cesena

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

MantovaLigaCesena
Average goals in match 2.682.55 2.66
Both teams scored 50%53% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%48% 53%
Clean sheets 24%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 74%70% 71%
Goal after half-time 84%78% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mantova 0 - 0 - 1 Cesena. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mantova vs Cesena?

The Serie B match finished Mantova 3:0 Cesena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mantova vs Cesena?

Mantova score 1.18 goals per game on average and Cesena 1.18. The Serie B average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mantova's matches and 61% of Cesena's.

What form are Mantova and Cesena in?

Over the last 5 games Mantova have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Cesena 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mantova vs Cesena?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mantova vs Cesena: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.