Italy - Serie BStadio Danilo MartelliData current as of November 02, 2026

Mantova vs Pisa: match statistics

Mantova crest
Mantova
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Pisa crest
Pisa

Mantova vs Pisa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mantova played against Pisa in Serie B (Italy). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Stadio Danilo Martelli. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Mantova has 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.50 points per game. Pisa has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.50 points per game.

Scoring records

Mantova scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.75. Pisa scores 1.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Mantova's games and 50% of Pisa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 75%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pisa has the higher season xG average, 1.89 to 1.34 per game. Mantova takes 11.5 shots per game, while Pisa takes 16.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Mantova leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Pisa leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mantova's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Pisa, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie B games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mantova are top of the table and remain unbeaten in their four league matches so far, recording 3 wins and a draw, while Pisa have a record of 2 wins and 2 defeats. The hosts have won both of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while also keeping a clean sheet in 50% of those fixtures. Pisa also won their only away match to date 3:0, but their recent overall form is weaker: they have suffered 3 defeats in five matches and conceded 9 goals during that run, compared with Mantova’s 8. Mantova create slightly higher-quality chances, averaging 1.54 xG compared with Pisa’s 1.44, while also limiting opponents to a lower xG: 1.05 versus 1.40. The visitors are dangerous thanks to a 25% conversion rate and 7 shots on target per match, but the hosts’ advantage in current consistency and defensive strength points to a Mantova victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Mantova has recorded BTTS in 67% of its matches this season, with the rate rising to 80% over the last five games; during this period, the team averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Pisa had BTTS in only 40% of its last five matches, but conceded 1.8 goals per game over that span, which should increase the hosts’ chances of finding the net. The visitors regularly create chances worth 1.63 xG, while Mantova allows opponents 1.36 xG, making a Pisa goal a realistic scenario. The strongest argument against BTTS is Pisa’s 100% clean-sheet record in the season data, but this sample contrasts with the nine goals conceded in the last five matches. With the league BTTS average at 60%, the more likely outcome is for both teams to score — BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The chance-creation profile points to a match with at least two goals: Mantova generate an average of 2.04 xG at home, while Pisa allow 1.40 xG away from home. Pisa, in turn, average 1.44 xG in attack, virtually identical to the 1.43 xG conceded by Mantova, so the visitors should create chances of their own. In their last five matches, Mantova averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Pisa conceded as many as 1.8 goals per match. Over 2.5 goals is only marginally preferred, despite landing in 60% of Mantova’s recent matches and 80% of Pisa’s, because Pisa have kept a clean sheet in all of their away matches so far this season. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, supported by a projected 2.85 goals and the fact that both teams have cleared this line in 67% and 100% of their league matches, respectively.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Pisa leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time, as the visitors have won 100% of their matches so far, averaging 3.0 goals scored and conceding none. Pisa were ahead at half-time in 100% of their away fixtures, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before the break and likewise keeping a clean sheet during that period. Mantova conceded an average of 1.33 goals in the first halves and 2.0 across entire matches, reinforcing the scenario of an early advantage for the visitors. The hosts do create plenty of chances, as indicated by an xG of 2.04 and 18.33 shots per match, but their conversion rate is only 5%, compared with Pisa’s 25%. Mantova’s better recent form, with 60% wins in their last five matches, increases the chances of a half-time draw or a turnaround, but it does not eliminate the visitors’ clear defensive advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
MantovaPisa
14Shots14
MantovaPisa
3Shots on target5
MantovaPisa
1.45xG1.5
MantovaPisa
5Corners5
MantovaPisa
48Dangerous attacks36
MantovaPisa
13Fouls13
MantovaPisa
4Cards3
MantovaPisa

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1.5
MantovaPisa
0.75Goals allowed / game1.5
MantovaPisa
46%Average possession48%
MantovaPisa
5.5Shots on target / game7.25
MantovaPisa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.5Shots per game16.75
MantovaPisa
5.5Shots on target7.25
MantovaPisa
17.4%Shot conversion9%
MantovaPisa
46%Possession48%
MantovaPisa
1.34xG for1.89
MantovaPisa
1.33xG against1.42
MantovaPisa

Shooting quality

Mantova: Counter-attackingPisa: Attacking
MantovaPisa
Accuracy (shots on target)48%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mantova is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2.5 pts / game - Mantova · 1.5 pts / game - Pisa

Mantova
WWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
75% W25% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Pisa
LWWL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mantova is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Mantova · 1.5 goals / game - Pisa

Mantova is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - Mantova · 1.5 goals / game - Pisa

Mantova scoring profile: very strong

Mantova scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).

Pisa scoring profile: very strong

Pisa scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Mantova keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).

8Goals scored (season)6
MantovaPisa
3Goals conceded (season)6
MantovaPisa
2.75Average goals per game3
MantovaPisa
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MantovaPisa
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
MantovaPisa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
MantovaPisa
75%2 goals50%
MantovaPisa
25%3 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%4 goals0%
MantovaPisa

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
MantovaPisa
0%2 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%3 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%4 goals25%
MantovaPisa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
MantovaPisa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MantovaPisa
25%Scored in both halves25%
MantovaPisa

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
MantovaPisa
75%BTTS - last 550%
MantovaPisa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
MantovaPisa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
MantovaPisa
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MantovaPisa
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MantovaPisa

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mantova is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Mantova · 1.75 pts / game - Pisa

Mantova - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Pisa - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.75
MantovaPisa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.75
MantovaPisa
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
MantovaPisa
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.75
MantovaPisa
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MantovaPisa
50%No goal before half-time50%
MantovaPisa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per game (2nd half)1.25
MantovaPisa
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
MantovaPisa
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
MantovaPisa
2.25Average goals (2nd half)1.25
MantovaPisa
25%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MantovaPisa
25%No goal after half-time50%
MantovaPisa

Mantova - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 75%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pisa - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Mantova - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.75
Goals scored / game0.51.5
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.52.3
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet100%25%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pisa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.751.25
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.5
Average goals per game1.81.3
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mantova
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mantova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

MantovaLigaPisa
Average goals per game▲ 2.752.60▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 75%63%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%52%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 25%20%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%63%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MantovaYellow cardAlessio Castellini
  2. MantovaYellow cardJonathan Silva Pertinhes
  3. MantovaSubstitutionOn: Vanja VlahovićOff: Ettore Gliozzi
  4. PisaSubstitutionOn: İsak VuralOff: Giuseppe Leone
  5. PisaYellow cardAlessandro Confente
  6. PisaYellow cardArturo Calabresi
  7. MantovaYellow cardIsmael Cajazzo
  8. MantovaYellow cardStefano Cella

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mantova vs Pisa?

The Serie B match finished Mantova 2:2 Pisa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mantova vs Pisa?

Mantova score 2.00 goals per game on average and Pisa 1.50. The Serie B average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Mantova's matches and 50% of Pisa's.

What form are Mantova and Pisa in?

Over the last 5 games Mantova have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and Pisa 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mantova vs Pisa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.