Tunisia - Ligue 1Stade Abdelaziz ChtiouiData current as of October 24, 2026

Marsa vs Hammam-Lif: match statistics

Marsa crest
Marsa
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Hammam-Lif crest
Hammam-Lif

Marsa vs Hammam-Lif: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Marsa played against Hammam-Lif in Ligue 1 (Tunisia). The game was played on October 23, 2026. Venue: Stade Abdelaziz Chtioui. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Marsa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Hammam-Lif has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Marsa scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 0.50. Hammam-Lif scores 0.33 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 17% of Marsa's games and 17% of Hammam-Lif's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 0%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Marsa has the higher season xG average, 1.19 to 0.71 per game. Marsa takes 8.7 shots per game, while Hammam-Lif takes 5.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Marsa leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. Hammam-Lif leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Marsa's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Hammam-Lif, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligue 1 games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Marsa remain unbeaten at home: they have collected 4 points from their two matches so far, won 50% of those games, and have not conceded a single goal. Hammam-Lif sit 16th, have lost all three matches this season, are yet to score, and lost their only away game without finding the net. The hosts create more chances, averaging 1.34 xG and 3 shots on target per home match, while the visitors manage just 0.73 xG and 1 shot on target away from home. Marsa are also limited in attack, averaging 0.5 goals at home and failing to score in 50% of such matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of a draw. Nevertheless, home advantage, Marsa's highly disciplined defense, and the visitors' extremely poor attacking run all point towards a narrow home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is Hammam-Lif’s very poor offensive efficiency: the team has failed to score in both the season data and its last 5 matches, while its average xG stands at just 0.73. Marsa have also been scoring only 0.8 goals per match recently, although their xG of 1.22 suggests a greater chance of the hosts scoring at least once. BTTS has not occurred in any of the teams’ matches so far this season, while over the last five fixtures the rate stands at 40% for Marsa and 0% for Hammam-Lif. The visitors have conceded an average of 0.8 goals in their last 5 matches, so a low-scoring game is likely, with Marsa potentially finding the net while Hammam-Lif once again remain goalless. A BTTS - Yes scenario cannot be ruled out, as Marsa allow opponents an xG of 1.39; however, the visitors’ current attacking struggles clearly strengthen the BTTS - No pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The data points to a clearly limited attacking potential for both teams: Marsa averaged 0.8 goals in their last five matches, while Hammam-Lif failed to score a single goal during this period. The visitors average just 1 shot on target per match, compared with 2 for Marsa, reducing the likelihood of an open, high-scoring game. None of Hammam-Lif’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals, while Marsa recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of their games. The estimated 1.50 goals is clearly below the league average of 2.11, despite both defenses allowing chances of moderate quality. The Under 3.5 goals line has the strongest statistical support, as losing this bet would require at least four goals, which appears unlikely given Hammam-Lif’s very poor finishing.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: in their last five matches, both teams were level after 45 minutes in 80% of games. Hammam-Lif did not score a single first-half goal during this period, while Marsa averaged just 0.6 goals, clearly reducing the likelihood of an early breakthrough. Over the full match, however, Marsa have slightly stronger arguments, having averaged 0.8 goals per game compared with 0.0 for the visitors and earned 1.0 point per match against just 0.2 for Hammam-Lif. Both teams are inefficient after the break, averaging 0.2 and 0.0 goals per game respectively, so a low-scoring draw maintained until full-time remains the most likely outcome. The X/X scenario is stronger than X/1, although Marsa’s superior form and higher number of shots on target, 2.0 compared with 1.0, give the hosts a realistic chance of a late narrow victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
MarsaHammam-Lif
11Shots5
MarsaHammam-Lif
2Shots on target1
MarsaHammam-Lif
1.15xG0.53
MarsaHammam-Lif
7Corners1
MarsaHammam-Lif
44Dangerous attacks19
MarsaHammam-Lif
-1Fouls-1
MarsaHammam-Lif
3Cards0
MarsaHammam-Lif

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.83Goals scored / game0.33
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.5Goals allowed / game0.83
MarsaHammam-Lif
51%Average possession44%
MarsaHammam-Lif
3.67Shots on target / game1.67
MarsaHammam-Lif

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.67Shots per game5.5
MarsaHammam-Lif
3.67Shots on target1.67
MarsaHammam-Lif
9.6%Shot conversion6.1%
MarsaHammam-Lif
51%Possession44%
MarsaHammam-Lif
1.19xG for0.71
MarsaHammam-Lif
1.44xG against1.19
MarsaHammam-Lif

Shooting quality

Marsa: BalancedHammam-Lif: Balanced
MarsaHammam-Lif
Accuracy (shots on target)42%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Marsa is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Marsa · 0.8 pts / game - Hammam-Lif

Marsa
DLWDW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Hammam-Lif
LLLWD
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.55Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Marsa is 152% better for: goals scored per game.

0.83 goals / game - Marsa · 0.33 goals / game - Hammam-Lif

Marsa is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Marsa · 0.83 goals / game - Hammam-Lif

Marsa scoring profile: strong

Marsa scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Hammam-Lif keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).

Hammam-Lif scoring profile: more difficult

Hammam-Lif scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 games), while Marsa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 games).

5Goals scored (season)2
MarsaHammam-Lif
3Goals conceded (season)5
MarsaHammam-Lif
1.33Average goals per game1.17
MarsaHammam-Lif
5Goals scored (last 5)2
MarsaHammam-Lif
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
MarsaHammam-Lif

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal33%
MarsaHammam-Lif
17%2 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
17%3 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%4 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal83%
MarsaHammam-Lif
17%2 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%3 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%4 goals0%
MarsaHammam-Lif

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
17%Scored in both halves0%
MarsaHammam-Lif

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
20%BTTS - last 520%
MarsaHammam-Lif

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
MarsaHammam-Lif
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MarsaHammam-Lif

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
MarsaHammam-Lif
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MarsaHammam-Lif

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Marsa is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Marsa · 1.17 pts / game - Hammam-Lif

Marsa - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Hammam-Lif - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)1.17
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
MarsaHammam-Lif
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
MarsaHammam-Lif
50%No goal before half-time67%
MarsaHammam-Lif

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.5
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
MarsaHammam-Lif
0.5Average goals (2nd half)0.5
MarsaHammam-Lif
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MarsaHammam-Lif
83%No goal after half-time100%
MarsaHammam-Lif

Marsa - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hammam-Lif - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Marsa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.20
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Hammam-Lif - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.40
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Marsa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Hammam-Lif
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
62%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
34%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Marsa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.94
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Hammam-Lif

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

MarsaLigaHammam-Lif
Average goals per game▼ 1.332.00▼ 1.17
Both teams scored▼ 17%45%▼ 17%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 33%34%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▲ 67%32%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%64%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%68%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / game
0.80
Away goals / game
+50%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defensive advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MarsaYellow cardMohamed Aziz Traidi
  2. Hammam-LifSubstitutionOn: Yassine ChamakhiOff: Haytham Mohamadi
  3. MarsaRed cardOussema Bahri

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Marsa vs Hammam-Lif?

The Ligue 1 match finished Marsa 1:1 Hammam-Lif. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Marsa vs Hammam-Lif?

Marsa score 0.83 goals per game on average and Hammam-Lif 0.33. The Ligue 1 average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Marsa's matches and 17% of Hammam-Lif's.

What form are Marsa and Hammam-Lif in?

Over the last 5 games Marsa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Hammam-Lif 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Marsa vs Hammam-Lif?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Marsa vs Hammam-Lif: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.