Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of October 17, 2026

Mārupe vs Super Nova II: match statistics

Mārupe crest
Mārupe
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

Mārupe vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mārupe played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Mārupe has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Super Nova II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Mārupe scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.56. Super Nova II scores 1.44 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 3.58 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's games and 63% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 44%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mārupe has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.13 per game. Mārupe takes 9.8 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 7.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Mārupe leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mārupe's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.58 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mārupe have a higher average goals-per-game figure at home—1.75 compared with Super Nova II’s 1.50 away—as well as more shots on target per match: 4.57 to 4.38. However, the hosts are in poor form, having lost 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring just 4 goals and conceding 11 in that run. Super Nova II have also won only once in their last five matches, but their defense has conceded 7 goals, clearly fewer than their opponents. The key factor is the visitors’ high away draw rate of 50%, while they lose just 25% of their matches on the road. Mārupe should enjoy more possession, averaging 53%, but the hosts’ weak defense, conceding 1.88 goals per match, limits their chances of taking all three points. Therefore, a draw is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes has a moderate edge, as Super Nova II have scored in every match this season, while their BTTS rate stands at as high as 75%, compared with 50% for Mārupe. The hosts concede an average of 1.25 goals, but their defense has clearly weakened over the last five matches, allowing opponents to score 2.2 goals per game, with an xG against of 2.00. Mārupe have scored only 0.8 goals per game recently, but Super Nova II allow opponents a high average xG of 1.88 and have conceded 7 goals in their last five fixtures. The main risk is the lower attacking efficiency of both teams over their last five matches; however, the combination of the hosts' weak defense and the visitors' consistent scoring record supports goals at both ends more strongly than a scenario in which one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Super Nova II score an average of 1.50 goals per match and have found the net at least once in 100% of their games, while Mārupe concede an average of 1.25 goals. The hosts have allowed opponents chances worth 1.47 xG, and their last five matches produced as many as 2.20 goals conceded per game. The visitors’ defense is also vulnerable, conceding an average of 1.63 goals and 1.88 xG, which supports a projection of around 1.40 goals for Mārupe. The Over 1.5 goals line has been covered in 100% of Super Nova II matches and 63% of Mārupe’s games, making it clearly safer than the more balanced 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Super Nova II victory, as Mārupe have drawn at the break in 60% of their last five matches and scored just 0.2 goals per game during the opening half. The visitors have made the stronger start over this period: they led at the break in 40% of their matches and scored an average of 0.6 goals, while the hosts have not once gone into half-time ahead. After the interval, the advantage shifts to the away side, who average 1.0 goals in second halves compared with Mārupe’s 0.5, while the hosts concede 0.88 goals per match during that period. Current form further favors the visitors: Mārupe have lost four of their last five matches and conceded an average of 2.2 goals in those games, whereas Super Nova II have suffered only two defeats and recorded draws in 40% of those matches. Although the hosts have a higher season-long win rate, 50% compared with 25%, their poor recent form and the five goals conceded between the 76th and 90th minutes reinforce the scenario of an away-side turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
MārupeSuper Nova II
13Shots11
MārupeSuper Nova II
4Shots on target5
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.49xG1.41
MārupeSuper Nova II
5Corners3
MārupeSuper Nova II
53Dangerous attacks48
MārupeSuper Nova II
11Fouls13
MārupeSuper Nova II
0Cards0
MārupeSuper Nova II

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MārupeSuper Nova II
1.63Goals scored / game1.44
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.56Goals allowed / game1.44
MārupeSuper Nova II
45%Average possession44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
4.31Shots on target / game3.5
MārupeSuper Nova II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.75Shots per game7.56
MārupeSuper Nova II
4.31Shots on target3.5
MārupeSuper Nova II
16.7%Shot conversion19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
45%Possession44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.54xG for1.13
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.25xG against1.69
MārupeSuper Nova II

Shooting quality

Mārupe: Counter-attackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
MārupeSuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mārupe is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Mārupe · 1 pts / game - Super Nova II

Mārupe
WLWLL
Season result split
44% W6% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-8
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Super Nova II
DLDLW
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-5
1.44 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.63 goals / game - Mārupe · 1.44 goals / game - Super Nova II

Super Nova II is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.56 goals / game - Mārupe · 1.44 goals / game - Super Nova II

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 games), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 games).

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 games).

26Goals scored (season)23
MārupeSuper Nova II
25Goals conceded (season)23
MārupeSuper Nova II
3.19Average goals per game2.88
MārupeSuper Nova II
6Goals scored (last 5)5
MārupeSuper Nova II
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
MārupeSuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal81%
MārupeSuper Nova II
50%2 goals44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%3 goals19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%4 goals0%
MārupeSuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
MārupeSuper Nova II
44%2 goals25%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%3 goals19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%4 goals6%
MārupeSuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
MārupeSuper Nova II
6%BTTS in both halves0%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%Scored in both halves25%
MārupeSuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MārupeSuper Nova II
60%BTTS - last 560%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
MārupeSuper Nova II
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
MārupeSuper Nova II

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
MārupeSuper Nova II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MārupeSuper Nova II
56%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Mārupe · 1.69 pts / game - Super Nova II

Mārupe - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.69
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.69
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.31
MārupeSuper Nova II
56%Clean sheet before half-time75%
MārupeSuper Nova II
69%No goal before half-time44%
MārupeSuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.19
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
MārupeSuper Nova II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
MārupeSuper Nova II
2.25Average goals (2nd half)1.56
MārupeSuper Nova II
38%Clean sheet after half-time31%
MārupeSuper Nova II
38%No goal after half-time50%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Mārupe - second-half results

38% W13% D50% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding232%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova II - second-half results

25% W44% D31% L
27
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 38%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mārupe - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Super Nova II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

MārupeLigaSuper Nova II
Average goals per game▼ 3.193.58▼ 2.88
Both teams scored▼ 50%63%• 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%69%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 31%21%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%75%▼ 69%
Goal after half-time▲ 94%86%▼ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.58
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.98
Home goals / game
1.60
Away goals / game
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super Nova IIAssistAram Baghdasaryan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Mārupe's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Super Nova II. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 2:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

Mārupe score 1.63 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.44. The 1. Liga average is 3.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 63% of Super Nova II's.

What form are Mārupe and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.